印度尼西亚文化大会历史上的文化观点展示

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Hendi Roy
{"title":"印度尼西亚文化大会历史上的文化观点展示","authors":"Hendi Roy","doi":"10.21009/SASKARA.011.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explain how the contestation of cultural views that occurred at the 1991 Indonesian Cultural Congress. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature study approach and cultural analysis techniques in the text. The text will also be analyzed with the sociological theory of culture according to Raymond Williams to see the process of production and reproduction of culture in the text. The researcher used eleven texts from a total of eighty-nine texts. This study concludes that the contestation of views can be seen based on three characteristics, namely related to the discourse of national development, the modernization of Indonesian culture, and the role of culture in the sector of community life. The relationship between the congress and national cultural politics was shown by the existence of ideas that supported the New Order cultural discourse and criticized it. The 1991 Indonesian Cultural Congress legitimized the national cultural politics of the New Order based on the role of the Directorate of Culture and TMII, the interpretation of undeveloped social formations of society, and the mode of production with a capitalist system. As a tradition that has been carried out in every history of cultural development, congress has always reproduced the values of cultural democratization. In supporting the national cultural politics of the New Order, several speakers use the term development, maintenance and fostering of a culture that is distinctive with dominant cultural discourses. Meanwhile, those who criticized him highlighted the reality of people's cultural life with the discourse of national development.","PeriodicalId":35501,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Services and Standards","volume":"1 1","pages":"67-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KONTESTASI PANDANGAN BUDAYA DALAM SEJARAH KONGRES KEBUDAYAAN DI INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Hendi Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/SASKARA.011.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to explain how the contestation of cultural views that occurred at the 1991 Indonesian Cultural Congress. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature study approach and cultural analysis techniques in the text. The text will also be analyzed with the sociological theory of culture according to Raymond Williams to see the process of production and reproduction of culture in the text. The researcher used eleven texts from a total of eighty-nine texts. This study concludes that the contestation of views can be seen based on three characteristics, namely related to the discourse of national development, the modernization of Indonesian culture, and the role of culture in the sector of community life. The relationship between the congress and national cultural politics was shown by the existence of ideas that supported the New Order cultural discourse and criticized it. The 1991 Indonesian Cultural Congress legitimized the national cultural politics of the New Order based on the role of the Directorate of Culture and TMII, the interpretation of undeveloped social formations of society, and the mode of production with a capitalist system. As a tradition that has been carried out in every history of cultural development, congress has always reproduced the values of cultural democratization. In supporting the national cultural politics of the New Order, several speakers use the term development, maintenance and fostering of a culture that is distinctive with dominant cultural discourses. Meanwhile, those who criticized him highlighted the reality of people's cultural life with the discourse of national development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Services and Standards\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"67-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Services and Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/SASKARA.011.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Services and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/SASKARA.011.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在解释1991年印尼文化大会上文化观点的争论是如何发生的。本研究采用定性研究方法,结合文献研究方法和文化分析技术对文本进行分析。本文还将根据Raymond Williams的文化社会学理论对文本进行分析,以了解文本中文化的生产和再生产过程。研究人员使用了八十九篇文章中的十一篇。本研究得出结论,观点的争论可以基于三个特征,即与国家发展的话语、印尼文化的现代化以及文化在社区生活中的作用有关。大会与国家文化政治之间的关系表现在支持和批评新秩序文化话语的思想的存在上。1991年印度尼西亚文化大会基于文化局和TMII的作用,对未发展的社会形态的解释,使新秩序的国家文化政治合法化,以及资本主义制度下的生产方式。大会作为文化发展史上的一项传统,始终体现着文化民主化的价值观。在支持新秩序的国家文化政治时,一些发言者使用了“发展、维护和培育一种与主流文化话语不同的文化”一词。同时,批评他的人也用国家发展的话语来凸显人们文化生活的现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KONTESTASI PANDANGAN BUDAYA DALAM SEJARAH KONGRES KEBUDAYAAN DI INDONESIA
This study aims to explain how the contestation of cultural views that occurred at the 1991 Indonesian Cultural Congress. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature study approach and cultural analysis techniques in the text. The text will also be analyzed with the sociological theory of culture according to Raymond Williams to see the process of production and reproduction of culture in the text. The researcher used eleven texts from a total of eighty-nine texts. This study concludes that the contestation of views can be seen based on three characteristics, namely related to the discourse of national development, the modernization of Indonesian culture, and the role of culture in the sector of community life. The relationship between the congress and national cultural politics was shown by the existence of ideas that supported the New Order cultural discourse and criticized it. The 1991 Indonesian Cultural Congress legitimized the national cultural politics of the New Order based on the role of the Directorate of Culture and TMII, the interpretation of undeveloped social formations of society, and the mode of production with a capitalist system. As a tradition that has been carried out in every history of cultural development, congress has always reproduced the values of cultural democratization. In supporting the national cultural politics of the New Order, several speakers use the term development, maintenance and fostering of a culture that is distinctive with dominant cultural discourses. Meanwhile, those who criticized him highlighted the reality of people's cultural life with the discourse of national development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Services and Standards
International Journal of Services and Standards Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: IJSS, a new refereed journal printed in four issues per year, publishes articles which present current practice and research in the area of services and standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信