法医Apophenia:感知生物信息档案

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
EJ Gonzalez-Polledo, Silvia Posocco
{"title":"法医Apophenia:感知生物信息档案","authors":"EJ Gonzalez-Polledo, Silvia Posocco","doi":"10.1353/anq.2022.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article draws on intersecting debates on archives, infrastructures, and knowledge in anthropology to analyze a “bioinformational turn” in forensic science. Focusing on transformations in forensic science provision in England and Wales apparent in the history of a forensic archive, the article frames frictions between ways of making knowledge across scientific cultures, law enforcement, and a legal system that aims to create facts and certainty, against forensic scientists’ concern with process and context across disparate realms of practice. Following scientists’ descriptions of the changing conditions under which forensic science is currently practiced and the erosion of forensic provision as a public service, we argue that forensic practitioners interrogate positivist projections of forensic science by thinking with complexity as they follow evidence through multiple registers, infrastructures, and datasets.","PeriodicalId":51536,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Quarterly","volume":"95 1","pages":"123 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forensic Apophenia: Sensing the Bioinformation Archive\",\"authors\":\"EJ Gonzalez-Polledo, Silvia Posocco\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/anq.2022.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This article draws on intersecting debates on archives, infrastructures, and knowledge in anthropology to analyze a “bioinformational turn” in forensic science. Focusing on transformations in forensic science provision in England and Wales apparent in the history of a forensic archive, the article frames frictions between ways of making knowledge across scientific cultures, law enforcement, and a legal system that aims to create facts and certainty, against forensic scientists’ concern with process and context across disparate realms of practice. Following scientists’ descriptions of the changing conditions under which forensic science is currently practiced and the erosion of forensic provision as a public service, we argue that forensic practitioners interrogate positivist projections of forensic science by thinking with complexity as they follow evidence through multiple registers, infrastructures, and datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2022.0002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2022.0002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文利用人类学中关于档案、基础设施和知识的交叉争论来分析法医学中的“生物信息转向”。这篇文章聚焦于法医档案历史上英格兰和威尔士法医学条款的转变,阐述了跨科学文化、执法和旨在创造事实和确定性的法律体系的知识获取方式之间的摩擦,以及法医科学家对不同实践领域的过程和背景的关注。根据科学家对当前法医学实践条件的变化以及法医学作为一项公共服务的侵蚀的描述,我们认为,法医从业者在通过多个登记册、基础设施和数据集追踪证据时,通过复杂的思维来审问法医学的实证主义预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forensic Apophenia: Sensing the Bioinformation Archive
ABSTRACT:This article draws on intersecting debates on archives, infrastructures, and knowledge in anthropology to analyze a “bioinformational turn” in forensic science. Focusing on transformations in forensic science provision in England and Wales apparent in the history of a forensic archive, the article frames frictions between ways of making knowledge across scientific cultures, law enforcement, and a legal system that aims to create facts and certainty, against forensic scientists’ concern with process and context across disparate realms of practice. Following scientists’ descriptions of the changing conditions under which forensic science is currently practiced and the erosion of forensic provision as a public service, we argue that forensic practitioners interrogate positivist projections of forensic science by thinking with complexity as they follow evidence through multiple registers, infrastructures, and datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Since 1921, Anthropological Quarterly has published scholarly articles, review articles, book reviews, and lists of recently published books in all areas of sociocultural anthropology. Its goal is the rapid dissemination of articles that blend precision with humanism, and scrupulous analysis with meticulous description.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信