学生对科学本质的理解与他们的元认知意识有何关系?

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dilara Goren, Ebru Kaya
{"title":"学生对科学本质的理解与他们的元认知意识有何关系?","authors":"Dilara Goren,&nbsp;Ebru Kaya","doi":"10.1007/s11191-022-00381-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper reports an empirical study on the relationship between middle school students’ understanding of nature of science (NOS) and their metacognitive awareness. The reconceptualised family resemblance approach to the nature of science (RFN) (Erduran &amp; Dagher, 2014; Kaya &amp; Erduran, 2016) as a holistic framework that covers science as epistemic-cognitive and social system guided the study. A total of 701 students (180 5<sup>th</sup>, 167 6<sup>th</sup>, 170 7<sup>th</sup>, and 184 8<sup>th</sup> grade) and 3 students from each grade level (in total 12 students) who have low, moderate, high-RFN understanding, and metacognitive awareness levels were interviewed. The data sources are the “RFN Student Questionnaire,” “Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Children,” and interviews. The data was analyzed with Pearson product-moment and thematic analysis. The results indicated that there is a statistically positive relationship between middle school students’ RFN understanding and their metacognitive awareness. Furthermore, the results of the interviews showed that students’ responses to RFN and metacognitive awareness questions were aligned and compatible. The students with high metacognitive awareness had higher RFN understanding and those with lower metacognitive awareness had lower RFN understanding. This relationship was evident for each grade level student separately as well. The study opens a new study area in terms of the use of metacognitive strategies in RFN-enriched lessons for experimental and causal-comparative designs. The teacher education programs or curriculum studies can consider utilization of metacognitive prompts in NOS teaching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56374,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"32 5","pages":"1471 - 1496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-022-00381-9.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is Students’ Understanding of Nature of Science Related with Their Metacognitive Awareness?\",\"authors\":\"Dilara Goren,&nbsp;Ebru Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11191-022-00381-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The paper reports an empirical study on the relationship between middle school students’ understanding of nature of science (NOS) and their metacognitive awareness. The reconceptualised family resemblance approach to the nature of science (RFN) (Erduran &amp; Dagher, 2014; Kaya &amp; Erduran, 2016) as a holistic framework that covers science as epistemic-cognitive and social system guided the study. A total of 701 students (180 5<sup>th</sup>, 167 6<sup>th</sup>, 170 7<sup>th</sup>, and 184 8<sup>th</sup> grade) and 3 students from each grade level (in total 12 students) who have low, moderate, high-RFN understanding, and metacognitive awareness levels were interviewed. The data sources are the “RFN Student Questionnaire,” “Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Children,” and interviews. The data was analyzed with Pearson product-moment and thematic analysis. The results indicated that there is a statistically positive relationship between middle school students’ RFN understanding and their metacognitive awareness. Furthermore, the results of the interviews showed that students’ responses to RFN and metacognitive awareness questions were aligned and compatible. The students with high metacognitive awareness had higher RFN understanding and those with lower metacognitive awareness had lower RFN understanding. This relationship was evident for each grade level student separately as well. The study opens a new study area in terms of the use of metacognitive strategies in RFN-enriched lessons for experimental and causal-comparative designs. The teacher education programs or curriculum studies can consider utilization of metacognitive prompts in NOS teaching.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"1471 - 1496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-022-00381-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-022-00381-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-022-00381-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文对中学生对科学本质的理解与其元认知意识之间的关系进行了实证研究。对科学本质的重新概念化的家族相似性方法(Erduran &Dagher, 2014;岩石,Erduran, 2016)作为一个整体框架,涵盖科学作为认识论-认知和社会系统指导的研究。共采访了701名五年级学生(180名,六年级学生167名,七年级学生170名,八年级学生184名)和每年级3名低、中、高rfn理解水平和元认知意识水平的学生(共12名)。数据来源为“RFN学生问卷”、“儿童元认知意识量表”和访谈。使用Pearson积矩和主题分析对数据进行分析。结果表明,中学生对RFN的理解与元认知意识之间存在显著正相关。此外,访谈结果显示,学生对RFN和元认知意识问题的回答是一致和相容的。元认知意识高的学生对RFN的理解程度较高,元认知意识低的学生对RFN的理解程度较低。这种关系在每个年级的学生中都很明显。本研究为实验和因果比较设计在富rnn课程中使用元认知策略开辟了一个新的研究领域。教师教育计划或课程研究可考虑在NOS教学中运用元认知提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How is Students’ Understanding of Nature of Science Related with Their Metacognitive Awareness?

The paper reports an empirical study on the relationship between middle school students’ understanding of nature of science (NOS) and their metacognitive awareness. The reconceptualised family resemblance approach to the nature of science (RFN) (Erduran & Dagher, 2014; Kaya & Erduran, 2016) as a holistic framework that covers science as epistemic-cognitive and social system guided the study. A total of 701 students (180 5th, 167 6th, 170 7th, and 184 8th grade) and 3 students from each grade level (in total 12 students) who have low, moderate, high-RFN understanding, and metacognitive awareness levels were interviewed. The data sources are the “RFN Student Questionnaire,” “Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Children,” and interviews. The data was analyzed with Pearson product-moment and thematic analysis. The results indicated that there is a statistically positive relationship between middle school students’ RFN understanding and their metacognitive awareness. Furthermore, the results of the interviews showed that students’ responses to RFN and metacognitive awareness questions were aligned and compatible. The students with high metacognitive awareness had higher RFN understanding and those with lower metacognitive awareness had lower RFN understanding. This relationship was evident for each grade level student separately as well. The study opens a new study area in terms of the use of metacognitive strategies in RFN-enriched lessons for experimental and causal-comparative designs. The teacher education programs or curriculum studies can consider utilization of metacognitive prompts in NOS teaching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science & Education publishes research informed by the history, philosophy and sociology of science and mathematics that seeks to promote better teaching, learning, and curricula in science and mathematics. More particularly Science & Education promotes: The utilization of historical, philosophical and sociological scholarship to clarify and deal with the many intellectual issues facing contemporary science and mathematics education.  Collaboration between the communities of scientists, mathematicians, historians, philosophers, cognitive psychologists, sociologists, science and mathematics educators, and school and college teachers. An understanding of the philosophical, cultural, economic, religious, psychological and ethical dimensions of modern science and the interplay of these factors in the history of science.  The inclusion of appropriate history and philosophy of science and mathematics courses in science and mathematics teacher-education programmes.  The dissemination of accounts of lessons, units of work, and programmes in science and mathematics, at all levels, that have successfully utilized history and philosophy.  Discussion of the philosophy and purposes of science and mathematics education, and their place in, and contribution to, the intellectual and ethical development of individuals and cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信