敏感主题:当代德奥电影的政治美学

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES
Simone Pfleger
{"title":"敏感主题:当代德奥电影的政治美学","authors":"Simone Pfleger","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2022.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vanderbeke). Among these chapters, the essays on films offer the most convincing application of the analytical framework; the tender gaze, however, also proves to offer productive insights into the politics of representation in literary works. In some cases, the authors struggle to illustrate how the tender gaze functions as a political intervention. Doris Dörrie’s film Keiner liebt mich (1994), for example, offers great examples of how the tender gaze creates spaces for empathy across racial, sexual, and gender divides. One wonders, however, how the tender gaze might obscure or fail to address some of the uncritical appropriations in the film that also perpetuate certain racist stereotypes. As the authors state at various points in the book, the reception of artworks is not homogenous. Thus, the question is not only whether or not the artworks are “moving” (89), but also of whom they move and in what way. This is where the concept becomes more complicated to apply: while analyzing the tender gaze as enacted on-screen between characters or within narrative structures proves very insightful, it remains more ambiguous and possibly even contradictory when it is applied to the process of reception. Overall, the examples in the volume convincingly show that theater, film, and literature manifest a new relationship to the political by depicting and eliciting tenderness, compassion, care, and “perspective taking” (41); it is challenging to assess how this might translate into broader shifts in political perspectives and action. The volume impressively and convincingly illustrates how productive the concept of the tender gaze is to analyze complex political interventions in film, literature, and art; it also inspires scholars to explore the concept further. One wonders, for example, how one might read social media with the tender gaze in mind? There also might be analytical value in creating contrasts and examining tensions: What, for example, is the opposite of a tender gaze and what does it mean when a gaze merely pretends to be tender? Beyond the gaze, it could be productive to think about tender touch, sound, images, and narratives circulating in different cultural spheres. Maria Stehle, University of Tennessee Knoxville","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"394 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitive Subjects: The Political Aesthetics of Contemporary German and Austrian Cinema by Leila Mukhida (review)\",\"authors\":\"Simone Pfleger\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/gsr.2022.0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vanderbeke). Among these chapters, the essays on films offer the most convincing application of the analytical framework; the tender gaze, however, also proves to offer productive insights into the politics of representation in literary works. In some cases, the authors struggle to illustrate how the tender gaze functions as a political intervention. Doris Dörrie’s film Keiner liebt mich (1994), for example, offers great examples of how the tender gaze creates spaces for empathy across racial, sexual, and gender divides. One wonders, however, how the tender gaze might obscure or fail to address some of the uncritical appropriations in the film that also perpetuate certain racist stereotypes. As the authors state at various points in the book, the reception of artworks is not homogenous. Thus, the question is not only whether or not the artworks are “moving” (89), but also of whom they move and in what way. This is where the concept becomes more complicated to apply: while analyzing the tender gaze as enacted on-screen between characters or within narrative structures proves very insightful, it remains more ambiguous and possibly even contradictory when it is applied to the process of reception. Overall, the examples in the volume convincingly show that theater, film, and literature manifest a new relationship to the political by depicting and eliciting tenderness, compassion, care, and “perspective taking” (41); it is challenging to assess how this might translate into broader shifts in political perspectives and action. The volume impressively and convincingly illustrates how productive the concept of the tender gaze is to analyze complex political interventions in film, literature, and art; it also inspires scholars to explore the concept further. One wonders, for example, how one might read social media with the tender gaze in mind? There also might be analytical value in creating contrasts and examining tensions: What, for example, is the opposite of a tender gaze and what does it mean when a gaze merely pretends to be tender? Beyond the gaze, it could be productive to think about tender touch, sound, images, and narratives circulating in different cultural spheres. Maria Stehle, University of Tennessee Knoxville\",\"PeriodicalId\":43954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Studies Review\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"394 - 396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Studies Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2022.0040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2022.0040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Vanderbeke)。在这些章节中,关于电影的文章提供了最令人信服的分析框架应用;然而,这种温柔的凝视也为文学作品中的表现政治提供了富有成效的见解。在某些情况下,作者很难说明温柔的凝视是如何作为政治干预发挥作用的。例如,Doris Dörrie的电影《Keiner liebt mich》(1994)就提供了一个很好的例子,说明了温柔的凝视是如何跨越种族、性和性别差异创造同理心的空间的。然而,人们想知道,这种温柔的凝视是如何掩盖或未能解决电影中一些不加批判的拨款问题的,这些拨款也延续了某些种族主义刻板印象。正如作者在书中的不同观点所言,艺术品的接受程度并不同质。因此,问题不仅在于艺术品是否在“移动”(89),还在于它们移动了谁以及以什么方式移动。这就是这个概念应用起来更加复杂的地方:虽然分析屏幕上人物之间或叙事结构中的温柔凝视被证明是非常有洞察力的,但当它应用于接受过程时,它仍然更加模糊,甚至可能是矛盾的。总的来说,该卷中的例子令人信服地表明,戏剧、电影和文学通过描绘和引发温柔、同情、关怀和“视角转换”,展现了与政治的新关系(41);评估这可能如何转化为政治观点和行动的更广泛转变,具有挑战性。这本书令人印象深刻和信服地说明了温柔凝视的概念在分析电影、文学和艺术中复杂的政治干预方面是多么富有成效;这也启发了学者们对这一概念的进一步探索。例如,有人想知道,人们如何在阅读社交媒体时带着温柔的目光?创造对比和审视紧张关系也可能有分析价值:例如,什么是温柔凝视的反面?当凝视只是假装温柔时,这意味着什么?除了凝视之外,思考在不同文化领域流传的温柔触摸、声音、图像和叙事可能会很有成效。Maria Stehle,田纳西大学诺克斯维尔分校
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensitive Subjects: The Political Aesthetics of Contemporary German and Austrian Cinema by Leila Mukhida (review)
Vanderbeke). Among these chapters, the essays on films offer the most convincing application of the analytical framework; the tender gaze, however, also proves to offer productive insights into the politics of representation in literary works. In some cases, the authors struggle to illustrate how the tender gaze functions as a political intervention. Doris Dörrie’s film Keiner liebt mich (1994), for example, offers great examples of how the tender gaze creates spaces for empathy across racial, sexual, and gender divides. One wonders, however, how the tender gaze might obscure or fail to address some of the uncritical appropriations in the film that also perpetuate certain racist stereotypes. As the authors state at various points in the book, the reception of artworks is not homogenous. Thus, the question is not only whether or not the artworks are “moving” (89), but also of whom they move and in what way. This is where the concept becomes more complicated to apply: while analyzing the tender gaze as enacted on-screen between characters or within narrative structures proves very insightful, it remains more ambiguous and possibly even contradictory when it is applied to the process of reception. Overall, the examples in the volume convincingly show that theater, film, and literature manifest a new relationship to the political by depicting and eliciting tenderness, compassion, care, and “perspective taking” (41); it is challenging to assess how this might translate into broader shifts in political perspectives and action. The volume impressively and convincingly illustrates how productive the concept of the tender gaze is to analyze complex political interventions in film, literature, and art; it also inspires scholars to explore the concept further. One wonders, for example, how one might read social media with the tender gaze in mind? There also might be analytical value in creating contrasts and examining tensions: What, for example, is the opposite of a tender gaze and what does it mean when a gaze merely pretends to be tender? Beyond the gaze, it could be productive to think about tender touch, sound, images, and narratives circulating in different cultural spheres. Maria Stehle, University of Tennessee Knoxville
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信