中间地带:1964年联合国贸易和发展会议与澳大利亚的反应

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Nicholas Ferns
{"title":"中间地带:1964年联合国贸易和发展会议与澳大利亚的反应","authors":"Nicholas Ferns","doi":"10.1353/jwh.2021.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The first United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), held in 1964, is often regarded as a pivotal moment in the history of relations between Global North and Global South. Yet there were a handful of countries at UNCTAD that sought to present themselves as not fitting into this system. These countries included Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Using Australia as a case study, this paper will demonstrate that the dominant dichotomy oversimplifies the developmental arguments that were presented at UNCTAD. Australia's policy at the Conference, which was generally referred to as the \"Middle Zone,\" revolved around presenting Australia as being neither a \"developed\" nor \"developing\" country. By examining the Australian arguments, a more nuanced understanding of North-South relations is possible. Ultimately, the Australian case study provides a new way of understanding the significance of UNCTAD in the history of international development.","PeriodicalId":17466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World History","volume":"32 1","pages":"465 - 489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Middle Zone: The 1964 UN Conference on Trade and Development and the Australian Response\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Ferns\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jwh.2021.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The first United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), held in 1964, is often regarded as a pivotal moment in the history of relations between Global North and Global South. Yet there were a handful of countries at UNCTAD that sought to present themselves as not fitting into this system. These countries included Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Using Australia as a case study, this paper will demonstrate that the dominant dichotomy oversimplifies the developmental arguments that were presented at UNCTAD. Australia's policy at the Conference, which was generally referred to as the \\\"Middle Zone,\\\" revolved around presenting Australia as being neither a \\\"developed\\\" nor \\\"developing\\\" country. By examining the Australian arguments, a more nuanced understanding of North-South relations is possible. Ultimately, the Australian case study provides a new way of understanding the significance of UNCTAD in the history of international development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World History\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"465 - 489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2021.0033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2021.0033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:1964年举行的第一届联合国贸易和发展会议(UNCTAD)经常被视为全球北方和全球南方关系史上的一个关键时刻。然而,贸发会议上有少数国家试图表明自己不适合这一体系。这些国家包括澳大利亚、新西兰和南非。以澳大利亚为例,本文将表明,占主导地位的二分法过于简化了贸发会议提出的发展论点。澳大利亚在会议上的政策通常被称为“中间区”,其核心是将澳大利亚描述为既不是“发达”国家也不是“发展中国家”。通过研究澳大利亚的论点,有可能对南北关系有更细致的理解。最后,澳大利亚的案例研究为理解贸发会议在国际发展史上的重要性提供了一种新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Middle Zone: The 1964 UN Conference on Trade and Development and the Australian Response
Abstract:The first United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), held in 1964, is often regarded as a pivotal moment in the history of relations between Global North and Global South. Yet there were a handful of countries at UNCTAD that sought to present themselves as not fitting into this system. These countries included Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Using Australia as a case study, this paper will demonstrate that the dominant dichotomy oversimplifies the developmental arguments that were presented at UNCTAD. Australia's policy at the Conference, which was generally referred to as the "Middle Zone," revolved around presenting Australia as being neither a "developed" nor "developing" country. By examining the Australian arguments, a more nuanced understanding of North-South relations is possible. Ultimately, the Australian case study provides a new way of understanding the significance of UNCTAD in the history of international development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Devoted to historical analysis from a global point of view, the Journal of World History features a range of comparative and cross-cultural scholarship and encourages research on forces that work their influences across cultures and civilizations. Themes examined include large-scale population movements and economic fluctuations; cross-cultural transfers of technology; the spread of infectious diseases; long-distance trade; and the spread of religious faiths, ideas, and ideals. Individual subscription is by membership in the World History Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信