模拟学习对护生期前新生儿护理能力的影响:一项准实验研究

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Pooja Bhardwaj
{"title":"模拟学习对护生期前新生儿护理能力的影响:一项准实验研究","authors":"Pooja Bhardwaj","doi":"10.47750/pnr.2022.13.s10.587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Premature birth is a sudden event of birth below the 37th week of pregnancy. In the third trimester, that is, 27-40 weeks of gestation when the baby’s major stages of development take place, the baby receives a wonderful blood supply to its respiratory system that enables it to breathe for the first time. \nMaterial And Method: A Quasi- experimental Non- equivalent control group pre-test post-test design was adopted to assess the effectiveness of simulation based learning in terms of competency of nursing students. Data was collected from 114 students studying BSc. 3rd Year in M.M. College of Nursing, and M.M. Institute of Nursing, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana. Study participants were randomly allotted in experimental group (n=55) and comparison group (n=59) by using purposive sampling technique. The data was collected by using selected variables, Structured Knowledge Questionnaires, Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and Clinical Decision Making Ability Questionnaires. \nResults: The study findings showed that majority of the nursing students (80%) were female in experimental group and (79.66%) in comparison group. The mean post-test knowledge score (26.22±5.24) of nursing students in experimental group was higher than the mean post -test knowledge score (22.46±6.54) of comparison group. The mean post-test skills score (45.40±7.45) of nursing students in experimental group was lower than the mean post -test skills score (45.51±8.36) of comparison group. The mean post-test clinical decision making ability score (17.84±2.84) of nursing students in experimental group was higher than the mean post-test clinical decision making ability score (14.39±5.47) of comparison group. The calculated ‘t’ value of post-test knowledge scores in experimental and comparison group (p=0.00*) and the calculated ‘t’ value of post-test skills scores in experimental and comparison group  (p=0.94*) The calculated t value of post-test  clinical decision making ability scores in experimental and comparison group(p=0.00*) was found to be statistically significant at 0.05 level of significance. \nConclusion: The study concluded that Simulation based learning was effective in enhancing the competency in terms of knowledge, skills and clinical decision making ability regarding Preterm Newborn Care among Nursing Students.","PeriodicalId":16728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness Of Simulation- Based Learning In Term Of Competency Regarding Pre-Term Newborn Care Among Nursing Students: An Quasi Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Bhardwaj\",\"doi\":\"10.47750/pnr.2022.13.s10.587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Premature birth is a sudden event of birth below the 37th week of pregnancy. In the third trimester, that is, 27-40 weeks of gestation when the baby’s major stages of development take place, the baby receives a wonderful blood supply to its respiratory system that enables it to breathe for the first time. \\nMaterial And Method: A Quasi- experimental Non- equivalent control group pre-test post-test design was adopted to assess the effectiveness of simulation based learning in terms of competency of nursing students. Data was collected from 114 students studying BSc. 3rd Year in M.M. College of Nursing, and M.M. Institute of Nursing, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana. Study participants were randomly allotted in experimental group (n=55) and comparison group (n=59) by using purposive sampling technique. The data was collected by using selected variables, Structured Knowledge Questionnaires, Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and Clinical Decision Making Ability Questionnaires. \\nResults: The study findings showed that majority of the nursing students (80%) were female in experimental group and (79.66%) in comparison group. The mean post-test knowledge score (26.22±5.24) of nursing students in experimental group was higher than the mean post -test knowledge score (22.46±6.54) of comparison group. The mean post-test skills score (45.40±7.45) of nursing students in experimental group was lower than the mean post -test skills score (45.51±8.36) of comparison group. The mean post-test clinical decision making ability score (17.84±2.84) of nursing students in experimental group was higher than the mean post-test clinical decision making ability score (14.39±5.47) of comparison group. The calculated ‘t’ value of post-test knowledge scores in experimental and comparison group (p=0.00*) and the calculated ‘t’ value of post-test skills scores in experimental and comparison group  (p=0.94*) The calculated t value of post-test  clinical decision making ability scores in experimental and comparison group(p=0.00*) was found to be statistically significant at 0.05 level of significance. \\nConclusion: The study concluded that Simulation based learning was effective in enhancing the competency in terms of knowledge, skills and clinical decision making ability regarding Preterm Newborn Care among Nursing Students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.s10.587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.s10.587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早产是指在怀孕37周以下突然发生的事件。在妊娠晚期,也就是妊娠27-40周,当婴儿的主要发育阶段发生时,婴儿的呼吸系统会得到良好的血液供应,使其能够第一次呼吸。材料与方法:采用准实验非等效对照组的前测后测设计,从护生能力的角度评估模拟学习的有效性。数据收集自114名攻读理学学士的学生。哈里亚纳邦安巴拉Mullana护理学院和护理学院硕士三年级。采用目的性抽样技术将研究参与者随机分为实验组(n=55)和对照组(n=59)。数据是通过选择变量、结构化知识问卷、客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)和临床决策能力问卷收集的。结果:实验组护生中女性占大多数(80%),对照组占79.66%。实验组护生测后知识平均得分(26.22±5.24)高于对照组测后知识得分(22.46±6.54)。实验组护生测试后技能平均得分(45.40±7.45)低于对照组护生的测试后技能得分(45.51±8.36)。实验组护生的测试后临床决策能力平均得分(17.84±2.84)高于对照组的测试后平均临床决策能力得分(14.39±5.47)。实验组和对照组测试后知识得分的计算't'值(p=0.00*)和测试后技能得分的计算'at'值,实验组和比较组测试后临床决策能力得分的计算t值(p=0.000*)在0.05水平上具有统计学意义意义结论:模拟学习能有效地提高护生对早产新生儿护理的知识、技能和临床决策能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness Of Simulation- Based Learning In Term Of Competency Regarding Pre-Term Newborn Care Among Nursing Students: An Quasi Experimental Study
Background: Premature birth is a sudden event of birth below the 37th week of pregnancy. In the third trimester, that is, 27-40 weeks of gestation when the baby’s major stages of development take place, the baby receives a wonderful blood supply to its respiratory system that enables it to breathe for the first time. Material And Method: A Quasi- experimental Non- equivalent control group pre-test post-test design was adopted to assess the effectiveness of simulation based learning in terms of competency of nursing students. Data was collected from 114 students studying BSc. 3rd Year in M.M. College of Nursing, and M.M. Institute of Nursing, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana. Study participants were randomly allotted in experimental group (n=55) and comparison group (n=59) by using purposive sampling technique. The data was collected by using selected variables, Structured Knowledge Questionnaires, Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and Clinical Decision Making Ability Questionnaires. Results: The study findings showed that majority of the nursing students (80%) were female in experimental group and (79.66%) in comparison group. The mean post-test knowledge score (26.22±5.24) of nursing students in experimental group was higher than the mean post -test knowledge score (22.46±6.54) of comparison group. The mean post-test skills score (45.40±7.45) of nursing students in experimental group was lower than the mean post -test skills score (45.51±8.36) of comparison group. The mean post-test clinical decision making ability score (17.84±2.84) of nursing students in experimental group was higher than the mean post-test clinical decision making ability score (14.39±5.47) of comparison group. The calculated ‘t’ value of post-test knowledge scores in experimental and comparison group (p=0.00*) and the calculated ‘t’ value of post-test skills scores in experimental and comparison group  (p=0.94*) The calculated t value of post-test  clinical decision making ability scores in experimental and comparison group(p=0.00*) was found to be statistically significant at 0.05 level of significance. Conclusion: The study concluded that Simulation based learning was effective in enhancing the competency in terms of knowledge, skills and clinical decision making ability regarding Preterm Newborn Care among Nursing Students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信