Liping Song, Zhikai Hu, Qinglong Wang, Jie Jiang, Yue Cao, Dan Wang, S. Rui, Long Li, Xuefeng Cai, Yantao Wu, Yi Suo
{"title":"基于实时pcr的物种定量测定-结果可以用重量/重量当量表示吗?","authors":"Liping Song, Zhikai Hu, Qinglong Wang, Jie Jiang, Yue Cao, Dan Wang, S. Rui, Long Li, Xuefeng Cai, Yantao Wu, Yi Suo","doi":"10.1080/08905436.2020.1743305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Food adulteration is a common challenge in the meat industry. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used as a method to detect contamination from different species of meat. From a consumer perspective, a PCR method with measurements in terms of weight/weight (w/w) ratios will be more familiar. In this study, the focus was on how to convert the results of quantitative analysis from genome/genome (g/g) to w/w using real-time PCR. The mixtures with different ratios of mutton in pork were analyzed as test samples. The c values of different species, as a reflection of the key conversion factors, were established and evaluated. The effects of heat treatment on w/w conversion of PCR data were also assessed. The results indicated that the c value shows significant variability among individual samples. An average c value was found to cause a bias of more than 7% for mixtures in the range of 20–80%. For individual meat samples with pre-determined c-values, real-time PCR was useful for quantitative analysis of mutton contamination in pork within the range of 20–80%, with a bias of detection of less than 2%. However, this method was shown to have a limit of quantification of 5% with mutton in pork. Furthermore, heat treatment (121°C, 15 min) significantly reduced the accuracy of quantitative analyses. Because the c value is not available for most commercial samples, and some food products are subjected to heat treatment as a method of sterilization, accurate quantitative analysis (w/w) may not be an option for commercial samples using PCR-based technology.","PeriodicalId":12347,"journal":{"name":"Food Biotechnology","volume":"34 1","pages":"116 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08905436.2020.1743305","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative species determination based on real time PCR–Can the results be expressed as weight/weight equivalents?\",\"authors\":\"Liping Song, Zhikai Hu, Qinglong Wang, Jie Jiang, Yue Cao, Dan Wang, S. Rui, Long Li, Xuefeng Cai, Yantao Wu, Yi Suo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08905436.2020.1743305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Food adulteration is a common challenge in the meat industry. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used as a method to detect contamination from different species of meat. From a consumer perspective, a PCR method with measurements in terms of weight/weight (w/w) ratios will be more familiar. In this study, the focus was on how to convert the results of quantitative analysis from genome/genome (g/g) to w/w using real-time PCR. The mixtures with different ratios of mutton in pork were analyzed as test samples. The c values of different species, as a reflection of the key conversion factors, were established and evaluated. The effects of heat treatment on w/w conversion of PCR data were also assessed. The results indicated that the c value shows significant variability among individual samples. An average c value was found to cause a bias of more than 7% for mixtures in the range of 20–80%. For individual meat samples with pre-determined c-values, real-time PCR was useful for quantitative analysis of mutton contamination in pork within the range of 20–80%, with a bias of detection of less than 2%. However, this method was shown to have a limit of quantification of 5% with mutton in pork. Furthermore, heat treatment (121°C, 15 min) significantly reduced the accuracy of quantitative analyses. Because the c value is not available for most commercial samples, and some food products are subjected to heat treatment as a method of sterilization, accurate quantitative analysis (w/w) may not be an option for commercial samples using PCR-based technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"116 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08905436.2020.1743305\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08905436.2020.1743305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08905436.2020.1743305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantitative species determination based on real time PCR–Can the results be expressed as weight/weight equivalents?
ABSTRACT Food adulteration is a common challenge in the meat industry. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used as a method to detect contamination from different species of meat. From a consumer perspective, a PCR method with measurements in terms of weight/weight (w/w) ratios will be more familiar. In this study, the focus was on how to convert the results of quantitative analysis from genome/genome (g/g) to w/w using real-time PCR. The mixtures with different ratios of mutton in pork were analyzed as test samples. The c values of different species, as a reflection of the key conversion factors, were established and evaluated. The effects of heat treatment on w/w conversion of PCR data were also assessed. The results indicated that the c value shows significant variability among individual samples. An average c value was found to cause a bias of more than 7% for mixtures in the range of 20–80%. For individual meat samples with pre-determined c-values, real-time PCR was useful for quantitative analysis of mutton contamination in pork within the range of 20–80%, with a bias of detection of less than 2%. However, this method was shown to have a limit of quantification of 5% with mutton in pork. Furthermore, heat treatment (121°C, 15 min) significantly reduced the accuracy of quantitative analyses. Because the c value is not available for most commercial samples, and some food products are subjected to heat treatment as a method of sterilization, accurate quantitative analysis (w/w) may not be an option for commercial samples using PCR-based technology.
期刊介绍:
Food Biotechnology is an international, peer-reviewed journal that is focused on current and emerging developments and applications of modern genetics, enzymatic, metabolic and systems-based biochemical processes in food and food-related biological systems. The goal is to help produce and improve foods, food ingredients, and functional foods at the processing stage and beyond agricultural production.
Other areas of strong interest are microbial and fermentation-based metabolic processing to improve foods, food microbiomes for health, metabolic basis for food ingredients with health benefits, molecular and metabolic approaches to functional foods, and biochemical processes for food waste remediation. In addition, articles addressing the topics of modern molecular, metabolic and biochemical approaches to improving food safety and quality are also published.
Researchers in agriculture, food science and nutrition, including food and biotechnology consultants around the world will benefit from the research published in Food Biotechnology. The published research and reviews can be utilized to further educational and research programs and may also be applied to food quality and value added processing challenges, which are continuously evolving and expanding based upon the peer reviewed research conducted and published in the journal.