{"title":"1830–1869年奥斯曼帝国时期的新希腊人","authors":"Berke Torunoğlu","doi":"10.1353/mgs.2021.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The question of Hellenic nationality in the Ottoman Empire is contemporaneous with the creation of Greece. By using the example of the Ottoman plans for the deportation of Greeks in 1869, this article contextualizes the so-called neo-Hellene population question to argue that the Ottoman Naturalization Law of the same year did not intend to create a more inclusive imperial identity; rather, it aimed to establish and maintain the control of the state over the subject peoples by facilitating expatriation, displacement, naturalization, and the loss of subjecthood. Through examination of individual cases as well as bureaucratic and diplomatic correspondence, this article also examines the practical ramifications of the Ottoman Naturalization Law for the neo-Hellene population of the Empire. This new law sought to identify, and ultimately expel, select ethno-religious communities deemed to be undesirable. In the 1860s, the Ottoman state faced a constant threat of separatism from non-Muslim populations, and reacted by creating an exclusivist imperial national identity and denaturalizing those populations. Most importantly, this denaturalization process would entail the deportation (tebʿid) of significant portions of the native Ottoman population, most of whom were Greeks by nationality.","PeriodicalId":43810,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES","volume":"39 1","pages":"49 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/mgs.2021.0003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Neo-Hellenes in the Ottoman Empire, 1830–1869\",\"authors\":\"Berke Torunoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mgs.2021.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The question of Hellenic nationality in the Ottoman Empire is contemporaneous with the creation of Greece. By using the example of the Ottoman plans for the deportation of Greeks in 1869, this article contextualizes the so-called neo-Hellene population question to argue that the Ottoman Naturalization Law of the same year did not intend to create a more inclusive imperial identity; rather, it aimed to establish and maintain the control of the state over the subject peoples by facilitating expatriation, displacement, naturalization, and the loss of subjecthood. Through examination of individual cases as well as bureaucratic and diplomatic correspondence, this article also examines the practical ramifications of the Ottoman Naturalization Law for the neo-Hellene population of the Empire. This new law sought to identify, and ultimately expel, select ethno-religious communities deemed to be undesirable. In the 1860s, the Ottoman state faced a constant threat of separatism from non-Muslim populations, and reacted by creating an exclusivist imperial national identity and denaturalizing those populations. Most importantly, this denaturalization process would entail the deportation (tebʿid) of significant portions of the native Ottoman population, most of whom were Greeks by nationality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"49 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/mgs.2021.0003\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mgs.2021.0003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MODERN GREEK STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mgs.2021.0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:The question of Hellenic nationality in the Ottoman Empire is contemporaneous with the creation of Greece. By using the example of the Ottoman plans for the deportation of Greeks in 1869, this article contextualizes the so-called neo-Hellene population question to argue that the Ottoman Naturalization Law of the same year did not intend to create a more inclusive imperial identity; rather, it aimed to establish and maintain the control of the state over the subject peoples by facilitating expatriation, displacement, naturalization, and the loss of subjecthood. Through examination of individual cases as well as bureaucratic and diplomatic correspondence, this article also examines the practical ramifications of the Ottoman Naturalization Law for the neo-Hellene population of the Empire. This new law sought to identify, and ultimately expel, select ethno-religious communities deemed to be undesirable. In the 1860s, the Ottoman state faced a constant threat of separatism from non-Muslim populations, and reacted by creating an exclusivist imperial national identity and denaturalizing those populations. Most importantly, this denaturalization process would entail the deportation (tebʿid) of significant portions of the native Ottoman population, most of whom were Greeks by nationality.
期刊介绍:
Praised as "a magnificent scholarly journal" by Choice magazine, the Journal of Modern Greek Studies is the only scholarly periodical to focus exclusively on modern Greece. The Journal publishes critical analyses of Greek social, cultural, and political affairs, covering the period from the late Byzantine Empire to the present. Contributors include internationally recognized scholars in the fields of history, literature, anthropology, political science, Byzantine studies, and modern Greece.