运输合同和国际公约

Q2 Social Sciences
F. Ferrari
{"title":"运输合同和国际公约","authors":"F. Ferrari","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between uniform substantive law conventions and private international law rules is contentious. In this paper, the author discusses why resort to private international law has to give way to the application of uniform substantive law conventions.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contracts of Carriage and International Conventions\",\"authors\":\"F. Ferrari\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relationship between uniform substantive law conventions and private international law rules is contentious. In this paper, the author discusses why resort to private international law has to give way to the application of uniform substantive law conventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oslo Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oslo Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oslo Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

统一实体法公约与国际私法规则之间的关系存在争议。在本文中,作者讨论了为什么诉诸国际私法必须让位于统一实体法公约的适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contracts of Carriage and International Conventions
The relationship between uniform substantive law conventions and private international law rules is contentious. In this paper, the author discusses why resort to private international law has to give way to the application of uniform substantive law conventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oslo Law Review
Oslo Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信