促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(单独使用或与人绒毛膜促性腺激素联合使用)与单独使用人绒毛膜促性腺激素在体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射控制卵巢刺激过程中触发排卵:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

Mathilde Bourdon M.D., Ph.D. , Maëliss Peigné M.D. , Céline Solignac Pharm.D. , Bernadette Darné M.D. , Solène Languille Ph.D. , Khaled Pocate-Cheriet M.D., Ph.D. , Pietro Santulli M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(单独使用或与人绒毛膜促性腺激素联合使用)与单独使用人绒毛膜促性腺激素在体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射控制卵巢刺激过程中触发排卵:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Mathilde Bourdon M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Maëliss Peigné M.D. ,&nbsp;Céline Solignac Pharm.D. ,&nbsp;Bernadette Darné M.D. ,&nbsp;Solène Languille Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Khaled Pocate-Cheriet M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Pietro Santulli M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) triggering improves oocyte maturation<span>, pregnancy outcomes, and safety compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggering during controlled ovarian stimulation.</span></p></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><p><span>A systematic review was performed using the following keywords: “GnRH agonist”; “hCG”; and “triggering.” Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, </span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg><span><span>, and EudraCT for randomized controlled clinical trials between January 1, 1990, and April 15, 2020. The primary outcomes were the total number of retrieved oocytes and the number of mature oocytes. The main secondary outcomes were the number of embryos obtained, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), </span>early pregnancy<span> loss rate, live birth rate, and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, bias assessment using the RoB2 tool, and data extraction according to the Cochrane methods. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed followed by prespecified sensitivity and subgroup analyses.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><p>Our search yielded 1,369 published studies and 216 unpublished studies. After screening the titles and abstracts, 65 published studies and 25 unpublished abstracts were assessed for eligibility. Of these, we excluded 61 studies. A total of 29 randomized controlled trials were included. The 26 studies with the number of oocytes retrieved enrolled a total of 2,755 women, of whom 1,419 had GnRHa triggering and 1,336 had hCG alone for triggering. A total of 12 studies reported the number of mature oocytes with a total of 1,619 women (806 had GnRHa triggering and 813 had hCG alone for triggering). The mean numbers of retrieved oocytes (difference in the means [95% confidence interval], 0.99 [0.21, 1.78]; n = 26) and mature oocytes (0.68 [0.04, 1.33]; n = 12) were statistically significantly higher after GnRHa than after hCG triggering. A similar difference was observed for the number of embryos (0.94 [0.19, 1.68]; n = 10). No differences in the CPR (risk ratio, 1.01 [0.90, 1.14]; n = 23), early pregnancy loss (1.27 [0.94, 1.71]; n = 16), and live birth rate (1.00 [0.77, 1.29]; n = 6) were noted. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was associated with a lower incidence of OHSS (odds ratio, 0.25 [0.08, 0.74]; n = 20). Moreover, after dual triggering (GnRHa associated with hCG) compared with hCG alone, the meta-analysis showed a statistically significantly higher number of retrieved and mature oocytes and CPR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>The final triggering using GnRHa allows a higher number of retrieved and mature oocytes to be obtained with comparable clinical outcomes and, after GnRHa alone, a lower OHSS risk compared with hCG triggering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73011,"journal":{"name":"F&S reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.08.003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (alone or combined with human chorionic gonadotropin) vs. human chorionic gonadotropin alone for ovulation triggering during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mathilde Bourdon M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Maëliss Peigné M.D. ,&nbsp;Céline Solignac Pharm.D. ,&nbsp;Bernadette Darné M.D. ,&nbsp;Solène Languille Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Khaled Pocate-Cheriet M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Pietro Santulli M.D., Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) triggering improves oocyte maturation<span>, pregnancy outcomes, and safety compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggering during controlled ovarian stimulation.</span></p></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><p><span>A systematic review was performed using the following keywords: “GnRH agonist”; “hCG”; and “triggering.” Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, </span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg><span><span>, and EudraCT for randomized controlled clinical trials between January 1, 1990, and April 15, 2020. The primary outcomes were the total number of retrieved oocytes and the number of mature oocytes. The main secondary outcomes were the number of embryos obtained, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), </span>early pregnancy<span> loss rate, live birth rate, and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, bias assessment using the RoB2 tool, and data extraction according to the Cochrane methods. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed followed by prespecified sensitivity and subgroup analyses.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><p>Our search yielded 1,369 published studies and 216 unpublished studies. After screening the titles and abstracts, 65 published studies and 25 unpublished abstracts were assessed for eligibility. Of these, we excluded 61 studies. A total of 29 randomized controlled trials were included. The 26 studies with the number of oocytes retrieved enrolled a total of 2,755 women, of whom 1,419 had GnRHa triggering and 1,336 had hCG alone for triggering. A total of 12 studies reported the number of mature oocytes with a total of 1,619 women (806 had GnRHa triggering and 813 had hCG alone for triggering). The mean numbers of retrieved oocytes (difference in the means [95% confidence interval], 0.99 [0.21, 1.78]; n = 26) and mature oocytes (0.68 [0.04, 1.33]; n = 12) were statistically significantly higher after GnRHa than after hCG triggering. A similar difference was observed for the number of embryos (0.94 [0.19, 1.68]; n = 10). No differences in the CPR (risk ratio, 1.01 [0.90, 1.14]; n = 23), early pregnancy loss (1.27 [0.94, 1.71]; n = 16), and live birth rate (1.00 [0.77, 1.29]; n = 6) were noted. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was associated with a lower incidence of OHSS (odds ratio, 0.25 [0.08, 0.74]; n = 20). Moreover, after dual triggering (GnRHa associated with hCG) compared with hCG alone, the meta-analysis showed a statistically significantly higher number of retrieved and mature oocytes and CPR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>The final triggering using GnRHa allows a higher number of retrieved and mature oocytes to be obtained with comparable clinical outcomes and, after GnRHa alone, a lower OHSS risk compared with hCG triggering.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F&S reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.08.003\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F&S reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571921000177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571921000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的评价与人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)对照刺激卵巢时触发促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)是否能改善卵母细胞成熟、妊娠结局和安全性。采用以下关键词进行系统评价:“GnRH激动剂”;“促”;和“触发”。在MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov和EudraCT上检索1990年1月1日至2020年4月15日的随机对照临床试验。主要观察指标为卵母细胞总数和成熟卵母细胞数量。主要次要结局为胚胎数量、临床妊娠率(CPR)、早期妊娠丢失率、活产率、卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)发生率。两名独立审稿人根据Cochrane方法进行研究选择、使用RoB2工具进行偏倚评估和数据提取。随机效应荟萃分析在预先指定的敏感性和亚组分析之后进行。结果:我们检索了1369项已发表的研究和216项未发表的研究。在筛选标题和摘要后,对65项已发表的研究和25项未发表的摘要进行了合格性评估。其中,我们排除了61项研究。共纳入29项随机对照试验。这26项研究收集了2755名女性的卵母细胞,其中1419名女性有GnRHa触发,1336名女性只有hCG触发。共有12项研究报告了1,619名女性的成熟卵母细胞数量(806名女性触发GnRHa, 813名女性单独触发hCG)。平均取卵数(平均值差[95%可信区间],0.99 [0.21,1.78];N = 26)和成熟卵母细胞(0.68 [0.04,1.33];n = 12), GnRHa触发后较hCG触发后显著增高。胚胎数量也有类似的差异(0.94 [0.19,1.68];N = 10)。心肺复苏术无差异(危险比,1.01 [0.90,1.14];N = 23),早孕丢失(1.27 [0.94,1.71];N = 16),活产率(1.00 [0.77,1.29];N = 6)。促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与OHSS发生率较低相关(优势比,0.25 [0.08,0.74];N = 20)。此外,与hCG单独触发相比,双重触发(GnRHa与hCG联合)后,检索到的成熟卵母细胞数量和心肺复苏率均有统计学意义上的显著提高。结论(s)使用GnRHa的最终触发可获得更多的检索到的成熟卵母细胞数量,且临床结果相当,并且与hCG单独触发相比,GnRHa单独触发后OHSS风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (alone or combined with human chorionic gonadotropin) vs. human chorionic gonadotropin alone for ovulation triggering during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) triggering improves oocyte maturation, pregnancy outcomes, and safety compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggering during controlled ovarian stimulation.

Evidence Review

A systematic review was performed using the following keywords: “GnRH agonist”; “hCG”; and “triggering.” Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EudraCT for randomized controlled clinical trials between January 1, 1990, and April 15, 2020. The primary outcomes were the total number of retrieved oocytes and the number of mature oocytes. The main secondary outcomes were the number of embryos obtained, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), early pregnancy loss rate, live birth rate, and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, bias assessment using the RoB2 tool, and data extraction according to the Cochrane methods. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed followed by prespecified sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Result(s)

Our search yielded 1,369 published studies and 216 unpublished studies. After screening the titles and abstracts, 65 published studies and 25 unpublished abstracts were assessed for eligibility. Of these, we excluded 61 studies. A total of 29 randomized controlled trials were included. The 26 studies with the number of oocytes retrieved enrolled a total of 2,755 women, of whom 1,419 had GnRHa triggering and 1,336 had hCG alone for triggering. A total of 12 studies reported the number of mature oocytes with a total of 1,619 women (806 had GnRHa triggering and 813 had hCG alone for triggering). The mean numbers of retrieved oocytes (difference in the means [95% confidence interval], 0.99 [0.21, 1.78]; n = 26) and mature oocytes (0.68 [0.04, 1.33]; n = 12) were statistically significantly higher after GnRHa than after hCG triggering. A similar difference was observed for the number of embryos (0.94 [0.19, 1.68]; n = 10). No differences in the CPR (risk ratio, 1.01 [0.90, 1.14]; n = 23), early pregnancy loss (1.27 [0.94, 1.71]; n = 16), and live birth rate (1.00 [0.77, 1.29]; n = 6) were noted. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was associated with a lower incidence of OHSS (odds ratio, 0.25 [0.08, 0.74]; n = 20). Moreover, after dual triggering (GnRHa associated with hCG) compared with hCG alone, the meta-analysis showed a statistically significantly higher number of retrieved and mature oocytes and CPR.

Conclusion(s)

The final triggering using GnRHa allows a higher number of retrieved and mature oocytes to be obtained with comparable clinical outcomes and, after GnRHa alone, a lower OHSS risk compared with hCG triggering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F&S reviews
F&S reviews Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信