检验沉闷定理

IF 3.1 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
D. Anthoff, R. Tol
{"title":"检验沉闷定理","authors":"D. Anthoff, R. Tol","doi":"10.1086/720612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weitzman’s “dismal theorem” has that the expected net present value of a stock problem with a stochastic growth rate with unknown variance is unbounded. Cost-benefit analysis can therefore not be applied to greenhouse gas emission control. We use the generalized central limit theorem to show that the dismal theorem can be tested, in a finite sample, by estimating the tail index. We apply this test to social cost of carbon estimates from three commonly used integrated assessment models and to previously published estimates. Two of the three models do not support the dismal theorem, but the third one does for low discount rates and most estimators. The meta-analysis does offer qualified support for the dismal theorem.","PeriodicalId":47114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists","volume":"9 1","pages":"885 - 920"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the Dismal Theorem\",\"authors\":\"D. Anthoff, R. Tol\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/720612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Weitzman’s “dismal theorem” has that the expected net present value of a stock problem with a stochastic growth rate with unknown variance is unbounded. Cost-benefit analysis can therefore not be applied to greenhouse gas emission control. We use the generalized central limit theorem to show that the dismal theorem can be tested, in a finite sample, by estimating the tail index. We apply this test to social cost of carbon estimates from three commonly used integrated assessment models and to previously published estimates. Two of the three models do not support the dismal theorem, but the third one does for low discount rates and most estimators. The meta-analysis does offer qualified support for the dismal theorem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"885 - 920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/720612\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Weitzman的“惨淡定理”认为,具有未知方差的随机增长率的股票问题的预期净现值是无界的。因此,成本效益分析不能应用于温室气体排放控制。我们使用广义中心极限定理来证明,在有限样本中,通过估计尾指数,可以检验惨淡定理。我们将这一测试应用于三个常用的综合评估模型的碳社会成本估计,以及之前发表的估计。三个模型中有两个不支持惨淡定理,但第三个模型支持低贴现率和大多数估计量。荟萃分析确实为这个令人沮丧的定理提供了合格的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing the Dismal Theorem
Weitzman’s “dismal theorem” has that the expected net present value of a stock problem with a stochastic growth rate with unknown variance is unbounded. Cost-benefit analysis can therefore not be applied to greenhouse gas emission control. We use the generalized central limit theorem to show that the dismal theorem can be tested, in a finite sample, by estimating the tail index. We apply this test to social cost of carbon estimates from three commonly used integrated assessment models and to previously published estimates. Two of the three models do not support the dismal theorem, but the third one does for low discount rates and most estimators. The meta-analysis does offer qualified support for the dismal theorem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信