不同斜方植入物治疗斜方骨性关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。

Ishith Seth, G. Bulloch, Nimish Seth, Q. Fogg, D. Hunter-Smith, W. Rozen
{"title":"不同斜方植入物治疗斜方骨性关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ishith Seth, G. Bulloch, Nimish Seth, Q. Fogg, D. Hunter-Smith, W. Rozen","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2023.2.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The trapeziometacarpal joint (TMCJ) is the most common hand joint affected by osteoarthritis (OA), and trapezium implant arthroplasty is a potential treatment for recalcitrant OA. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of various trapezium implants as an interventional option for TMCJ OA. Methods: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant studies up to May 28, 2022. Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines were adhered to, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO. The methodological quality was assessed by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tools for observational studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Subgroup analyses were performed on different replacement implants; the analysis was done using Open Meta-Analyst software and P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 123 studies comprising 5752 patients were included. Total joint replacement (TJR) implants demonstrate greater significant improvements in visual analogue scale pain scores postoperatively. Interposition with partial trapezial resection implants were associated with highest grip strength and highest reduction in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Revision rates were highest in TJR (12.3%) and lowest in interposition with partial trapezial resection (6.2%). Conclusion: Total joint replacement and interposition with partial trapezial resection implants improve pain score, grip strength, and DASH scores more than other implant options. Future studies should focus on high-quality randomized clinical trials comparing different implants to accumulate higher quality evidence and more reliable conclusions.","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"1 1","pages":"15589447231183172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Different Trapezium Implants for Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ishith Seth, G. Bulloch, Nimish Seth, Q. Fogg, D. Hunter-Smith, W. Rozen\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/1358-992x.2023.2.088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The trapeziometacarpal joint (TMCJ) is the most common hand joint affected by osteoarthritis (OA), and trapezium implant arthroplasty is a potential treatment for recalcitrant OA. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of various trapezium implants as an interventional option for TMCJ OA. Methods: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant studies up to May 28, 2022. Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines were adhered to, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO. The methodological quality was assessed by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tools for observational studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Subgroup analyses were performed on different replacement implants; the analysis was done using Open Meta-Analyst software and P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 123 studies comprising 5752 patients were included. Total joint replacement (TJR) implants demonstrate greater significant improvements in visual analogue scale pain scores postoperatively. Interposition with partial trapezial resection implants were associated with highest grip strength and highest reduction in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Revision rates were highest in TJR (12.3%) and lowest in interposition with partial trapezial resection (6.2%). Conclusion: Total joint replacement and interposition with partial trapezial resection implants improve pain score, grip strength, and DASH scores more than other implant options. Future studies should focus on high-quality randomized clinical trials comparing different implants to accumulate higher quality evidence and more reliable conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hand\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"15589447231183172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2023.2.088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2023.2.088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨关节炎(OA)最常见的手关节是梯形关节(TMCJ),而梯形关节置换术是治疗顽固性OA的一种潜在方法。本荟荟性分析旨在探讨各种梯形植入物作为TMCJ骨性关节炎的介入治疗选择的有效性和安全性。方法:检索截至2022年5月28日的Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane图书馆数据库的相关研究。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,并在PROSPERO中注册该方案。方法学质量通过国家心肺血液研究所的观察性研究工具和Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行评估。对不同替代种植体进行亚组分析;采用Open Meta-Analyst软件进行分析,P值<。0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:共纳入123项研究,5752例患者。全关节置换术(TJR)植入物在术后视觉模拟疼痛评分方面表现出更显著的改善。植入部分斜位切除植入物与最高的握力和最高的臂、肩和手残疾(DASH)评分降低相关。翻修率最高的是TJR(12.3%),最低的是斜部部分切除术(6.2%)。结论:与其他种植体相比,全关节置换术和斜部部分切除植入物可改善疼痛评分、握力和DASH评分。未来的研究应侧重于高质量的随机临床试验,比较不同的种植体,以积累更高质量的证据和更可靠的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Different Trapezium Implants for Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: The trapeziometacarpal joint (TMCJ) is the most common hand joint affected by osteoarthritis (OA), and trapezium implant arthroplasty is a potential treatment for recalcitrant OA. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of various trapezium implants as an interventional option for TMCJ OA. Methods: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases were searched for relevant studies up to May 28, 2022. Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines were adhered to, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO. The methodological quality was assessed by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tools for observational studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Subgroup analyses were performed on different replacement implants; the analysis was done using Open Meta-Analyst software and P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 123 studies comprising 5752 patients were included. Total joint replacement (TJR) implants demonstrate greater significant improvements in visual analogue scale pain scores postoperatively. Interposition with partial trapezial resection implants were associated with highest grip strength and highest reduction in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Revision rates were highest in TJR (12.3%) and lowest in interposition with partial trapezial resection (6.2%). Conclusion: Total joint replacement and interposition with partial trapezial resection implants improve pain score, grip strength, and DASH scores more than other implant options. Future studies should focus on high-quality randomized clinical trials comparing different implants to accumulate higher quality evidence and more reliable conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信