后文学、后真理与现代性

IF 0.5 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM

CounterText-A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI:10.3366/COUNT.2019.0150

James Corby

{"title":"后文学、后真理与现代性","authors":"James Corby","doi":"10.3366/COUNT.2019.0150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that what might be called the ‘post-literary’ is the completion of the literary – specifically, the literary that came to theoretical self-realisation in what came to be called Romanticism – and that that completion, which is our contemporary reality, happens, by its very nature, at the level of politics.","PeriodicalId":42177,"journal":{"name":"CounterText-A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Post-Literary, Post-Truth, and Modernity\",\"authors\":\"James Corby\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/COUNT.2019.0150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article argues that what might be called the ‘post-literary’ is the completion of the literary – specifically, the literary that came to theoretical self-realisation in what came to be called Romanticism – and that that completion, which is our contemporary reality, happens, by its very nature, at the level of politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CounterText-A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CounterText-A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/COUNT.2019.0150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CounterText-A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/COUNT.2019.0150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

本文认为，所谓的“后文学”是文学的完成 – 具体地说，在后来被称为浪漫主义的理论中实现自我的文学 – 而这种完成，也就是我们当代的现实，就其本质而言，发生在政治层面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Post-Literary, Post-Truth, and Modernity

This article argues that what might be called the ‘post-literary’ is the completion of the literary – specifically, the literary that came to theoretical self-realisation in what came to be called Romanticism – and that that completion, which is our contemporary reality, happens, by its very nature, at the level of politics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CounterText-A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量