假肢医师对可调节容量下肢假肢插座的看法综述

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Emily A. Barr, Kelsey Ebbs, J. Wensman, A. Gutierrez, N. Rosenblatt, D. Gates
{"title":"假肢医师对可调节容量下肢假肢插座的看法综述","authors":"Emily A. Barr, Kelsey Ebbs, J. Wensman, A. Gutierrez, N. Rosenblatt, D. Gates","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Adjustable-volume prosthetic sockets have been available for many years to address residual limb volume changes, although little research has been conducted regarding their efficacy. As such, prosthetists are guided by patient preference, personal experience, and professional perception. The purpose of this study was to explore clinician perceptions and experiences fitting adjustable-volume prosthetic sockets. Materials and Methods An anonymous online survey was distributed to certified prosthetists. The survey contained questions about prosthetists' demographics, whether they had previously fit an adjustable-volume prosthetic socket, whether these fittings were successful, and what challenges they experienced. Those who had not previously fit adjustable sockets were asked what barriers had prevented them from doing so. Results A total of 221 certified prosthetists completed the survey. Of the 195 eligible respondents, 82% had experience in fitting adjustable prosthetic sockets. The most commonly fit socket styles were the RevoFit (n = 123), Socket-less (n = 67), and Infinite (n = 66) sockets. Prosthetists had varied success with the different socket styles, with the RevoFit being the most successful, and the Infinite and Socket-less sockets the least successful. Respondents most frequently noted increased bulk (93% of respondents; n = 181), complicated fabrication (72%; n = 141), and poor cosmesis (65%; n = 127) as challenges faced when fitting adjustable-volume sockets. Some respondents felt these sockets were a useful clinical tool; however, common themes regarding clinical perception of adjustable sockets included issues with cost/reimbursement and appropriateness for only a subset of the population of individuals with amputation only. Other respondents felt that adjustable sockets were either not adequate for clinical use or required improvements before their use would be beneficial. Conclusions There is no majority opinion regarding the benefits and challenges of adjustable sockets among prosthetists. In general, prosthetists feel that adjustable sockets can be used as one of the various tools to accommodate complicated lower-limb fittings. Additional work is needed to provide clinicians with a best practice guideline for providing adjustability within lower-limb sockets. Clinical Relevance The study showed that prosthetists feel that adjustable sockets can be one of the tools used for complicated lower-limb fittings. Additional work is needed to develop a best practice guideline for providing adjustability in lower-limb sockets.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"34 1","pages":"233 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey of Prosthetists' Perspectives on Adjustable-Volume Lower-Limb Prosthetic Sockets\",\"authors\":\"Emily A. Barr, Kelsey Ebbs, J. Wensman, A. Gutierrez, N. Rosenblatt, D. Gates\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction Adjustable-volume prosthetic sockets have been available for many years to address residual limb volume changes, although little research has been conducted regarding their efficacy. As such, prosthetists are guided by patient preference, personal experience, and professional perception. The purpose of this study was to explore clinician perceptions and experiences fitting adjustable-volume prosthetic sockets. Materials and Methods An anonymous online survey was distributed to certified prosthetists. The survey contained questions about prosthetists' demographics, whether they had previously fit an adjustable-volume prosthetic socket, whether these fittings were successful, and what challenges they experienced. Those who had not previously fit adjustable sockets were asked what barriers had prevented them from doing so. Results A total of 221 certified prosthetists completed the survey. Of the 195 eligible respondents, 82% had experience in fitting adjustable prosthetic sockets. The most commonly fit socket styles were the RevoFit (n = 123), Socket-less (n = 67), and Infinite (n = 66) sockets. Prosthetists had varied success with the different socket styles, with the RevoFit being the most successful, and the Infinite and Socket-less sockets the least successful. Respondents most frequently noted increased bulk (93% of respondents; n = 181), complicated fabrication (72%; n = 141), and poor cosmesis (65%; n = 127) as challenges faced when fitting adjustable-volume sockets. Some respondents felt these sockets were a useful clinical tool; however, common themes regarding clinical perception of adjustable sockets included issues with cost/reimbursement and appropriateness for only a subset of the population of individuals with amputation only. Other respondents felt that adjustable sockets were either not adequate for clinical use or required improvements before their use would be beneficial. Conclusions There is no majority opinion regarding the benefits and challenges of adjustable sockets among prosthetists. In general, prosthetists feel that adjustable sockets can be used as one of the various tools to accommodate complicated lower-limb fittings. Additional work is needed to provide clinicians with a best practice guideline for providing adjustability within lower-limb sockets. Clinical Relevance The study showed that prosthetists feel that adjustable sockets can be one of the tools used for complicated lower-limb fittings. Additional work is needed to develop a best practice guideline for providing adjustability in lower-limb sockets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"233 - 240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要简介可调节体积的假肢插座已经问世多年,用于解决残肢体积的变化,尽管很少有人对其疗效进行研究。因此,假肢医生受患者偏好、个人经验和专业认知的指导。本研究的目的是探讨临床医生对安装可调节体积的假肢插座的看法和经验。材料和方法一项匿名的在线调查被分发给认证的假肢医生。该调查包含了关于假肢医生人口统计的问题,他们以前是否安装过可调节体积的假肢插座,这些安装是否成功,以及他们经历了什么挑战。那些以前没有安装可调节插座的人被问及是什么障碍阻止了他们这样做。结果共有221名认证的假肢医生完成了这项调查。在195名符合条件的受访者中,82%的人有安装可调节假肢插座的经验。最常见的插座类型是RevoFit(n=123)、无插座(n=67)和Infinite(n=66)插座。修复师在不同的插座样式上取得了不同的成功,RevoFit是最成功的,Infinite和socket less插座是最不成功的。受访者最常指出,体积增加(93%的受访者;n=181)、制造复杂(72%;n=141)和美容不良(65%;n=127)是安装可调节体积插座时面临的挑战。一些受访者认为这些插座是一种有用的临床工具;然而,关于可调节插座的临床认知的常见主题包括成本/报销问题以及仅适用于截肢患者的一小部分人群。其他受访者认为,可调节插座要么不适合临床使用,要么需要改进才能使用。结论对于可调节眼窝在假肢医师中的益处和挑战,没有多数意见。一般来说,假肢医生认为,可调节的插座可以作为各种工具之一,以适应复杂的下肢配件。还需要做更多的工作,为临床医生提供最佳实践指南,以提供下肢窝内的可调节性。临床相关性研究表明,假肢医生认为可调节插座可能是用于复杂下肢配件的工具之一。还需要做更多的工作来制定最佳实践指南,以提供下肢窝的可调节性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Survey of Prosthetists' Perspectives on Adjustable-Volume Lower-Limb Prosthetic Sockets
ABSTRACT Introduction Adjustable-volume prosthetic sockets have been available for many years to address residual limb volume changes, although little research has been conducted regarding their efficacy. As such, prosthetists are guided by patient preference, personal experience, and professional perception. The purpose of this study was to explore clinician perceptions and experiences fitting adjustable-volume prosthetic sockets. Materials and Methods An anonymous online survey was distributed to certified prosthetists. The survey contained questions about prosthetists' demographics, whether they had previously fit an adjustable-volume prosthetic socket, whether these fittings were successful, and what challenges they experienced. Those who had not previously fit adjustable sockets were asked what barriers had prevented them from doing so. Results A total of 221 certified prosthetists completed the survey. Of the 195 eligible respondents, 82% had experience in fitting adjustable prosthetic sockets. The most commonly fit socket styles were the RevoFit (n = 123), Socket-less (n = 67), and Infinite (n = 66) sockets. Prosthetists had varied success with the different socket styles, with the RevoFit being the most successful, and the Infinite and Socket-less sockets the least successful. Respondents most frequently noted increased bulk (93% of respondents; n = 181), complicated fabrication (72%; n = 141), and poor cosmesis (65%; n = 127) as challenges faced when fitting adjustable-volume sockets. Some respondents felt these sockets were a useful clinical tool; however, common themes regarding clinical perception of adjustable sockets included issues with cost/reimbursement and appropriateness for only a subset of the population of individuals with amputation only. Other respondents felt that adjustable sockets were either not adequate for clinical use or required improvements before their use would be beneficial. Conclusions There is no majority opinion regarding the benefits and challenges of adjustable sockets among prosthetists. In general, prosthetists feel that adjustable sockets can be used as one of the various tools to accommodate complicated lower-limb fittings. Additional work is needed to provide clinicians with a best practice guideline for providing adjustability within lower-limb sockets. Clinical Relevance The study showed that prosthetists feel that adjustable sockets can be one of the tools used for complicated lower-limb fittings. Additional work is needed to develop a best practice guideline for providing adjustability in lower-limb sockets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信