在上下文中理解COUNTER 5指标:供应商数据库使用报告的案例研究

Q3 Social Sciences
Heather Getsay, Aiping Chen-Gaffey
{"title":"在上下文中理解COUNTER 5指标:供应商数据库使用报告的案例研究","authors":"Heather Getsay, Aiping Chen-Gaffey","doi":"10.1080/1941126X.2021.1911450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This case study examines the COUNTER 5 metrics pertaining to database usage reports, aiming to gain insights into how the metrics function within a vendor platform. By simulating a search process in two major databases, the authors were able to contextualize the numbers in their institution’s COUNTER 5 Database Master Reports. The study finds that even though the Release 5 metrics – searches, investigations, and requests – are clearly defined by the COUNTER standard, the vendor platform design has a direct impact on how the usage is actually counted, thus shaping the outcome of a database usage report.","PeriodicalId":39383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship","volume":"33 1","pages":"92 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1941126X.2021.1911450","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding COUNTER 5 metrics in context: a case study on vendor database usage reports\",\"authors\":\"Heather Getsay, Aiping Chen-Gaffey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1941126X.2021.1911450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This case study examines the COUNTER 5 metrics pertaining to database usage reports, aiming to gain insights into how the metrics function within a vendor platform. By simulating a search process in two major databases, the authors were able to contextualize the numbers in their institution’s COUNTER 5 Database Master Reports. The study finds that even though the Release 5 metrics – searches, investigations, and requests – are clearly defined by the COUNTER standard, the vendor platform design has a direct impact on how the usage is actually counted, thus shaping the outcome of a database usage report.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"92 - 104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1941126X.2021.1911450\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2021.1911450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2021.1911450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本案例研究考察了与数据库使用情况报告有关的COUNTER 5指标,旨在深入了解这些指标在供应商平台中的作用。通过模拟两个主要数据库中的搜索过程,作者能够将其机构的COUNTER 5数据库主报告中的数字置于上下文中。研究发现,尽管COUNTER标准明确定义了Release 5指标——搜索、调查和请求,但供应商平台设计对使用情况的实际统计方式有直接影响,从而影响数据库使用情况报告的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding COUNTER 5 metrics in context: a case study on vendor database usage reports
Abstract This case study examines the COUNTER 5 metrics pertaining to database usage reports, aiming to gain insights into how the metrics function within a vendor platform. By simulating a search process in two major databases, the authors were able to contextualize the numbers in their institution’s COUNTER 5 Database Master Reports. The study finds that even though the Release 5 metrics – searches, investigations, and requests – are clearly defined by the COUNTER standard, the vendor platform design has a direct impact on how the usage is actually counted, thus shaping the outcome of a database usage report.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: A journal for information professionals who work with managing electronic resources in libraries The Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship (renamed from The Acquisitions Librarian to reflect the journal"s broader focus) provides a much-needed scholarly forum for librarians and other information professionals. This peer-reviewed quarterly journal addresses evolving work-related processes and procedure, current research, and the latest news on topics related to electronic resources and the digital environment"s impact on collecting, acquiring, and making accessible library materials. The journal provides opinion pieces, the latest news, book reviews, conference presentations, and e-resources related updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信