我们是“其他人”中的一员

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Wang Mingming
{"title":"我们是“其他人”中的一员","authors":"Wang Mingming","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2122215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Why should human beings be divided into “us” or “them”? This question underlies the basic proposition of anthropology. In fact, it has never received a decisive answer. In the dialogue between Marshall Sahlins and Wang Mingming, the two agree that “we are part of the other,” because it is to the other that we owe the constitution of our full selves. The modernity of diversity and plurality supports the validity of this judgment.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":"43 1","pages":"162 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"We Are One of “The Others”\",\"authors\":\"Wang Mingming\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02529203.2022.2122215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Why should human beings be divided into “us” or “them”? This question underlies the basic proposition of anthropology. In fact, it has never received a decisive answer. In the dialogue between Marshall Sahlins and Wang Mingming, the two agree that “we are part of the other,” because it is to the other that we owe the constitution of our full selves. The modernity of diversity and plurality supports the validity of this judgment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国社会科学\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"162 - 179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国社会科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2122215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国社会科学","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2122215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类为什么要分为“我们”和“他们”?这个问题构成了人类学的基本命题。事实上,这个问题从来没有得到一个决定性的答案。在马歇尔·萨林斯(Marshall Sahlins)与王明明(Wang Mingming)的对话中,两人都同意“我们是他者的一部分”,因为正是他者构成了我们完整的自我。多样性和多元性的现代性支持了这一判断的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
We Are One of “The Others”
Abstract Why should human beings be divided into “us” or “them”? This question underlies the basic proposition of anthropology. In fact, it has never received a decisive answer. In the dialogue between Marshall Sahlins and Wang Mingming, the two agree that “we are part of the other,” because it is to the other that we owe the constitution of our full selves. The modernity of diversity and plurality supports the validity of this judgment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国社会科学
中国社会科学 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5101
期刊介绍: Social Sciences in China Press (SSCP) was established in 1979, directly under the administration of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). Currently, SSCP publishes seven journals, one academic newspaper and an English epaper .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信