多元稳健损失保留中异常值的检测与处理

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Benjamin Avanzi, Mark Lavender, G. Taylor, Bernard Wong
{"title":"多元稳健损失保留中异常值的检测与处理","authors":"Benjamin Avanzi, Mark Lavender, G. Taylor, Bernard Wong","doi":"10.1017/s1748499523000155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Traditional techniques for calculating outstanding claim liabilities such as the chain-ladder are notoriously at risk of being distorted by outliers in past claims data. Unfortunately, the literature in robust methods of reserving is scant, with notable exceptions such as Verdonck & Debruyne (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48, 85–98) and Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). In this paper, we put forward two alternative robust bivariate chain-ladder techniques to extend the approach of Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). The first technique is based on Adjusted Outlyingness (Hubert & Van der Veeken, 2008. Journal of Chemometrics,22, 235–246) and explicitly incorporates skewness into the analysis while providing a unique measure of outlyingness for each observation. The second technique is based on bagdistance (Hubert et al., 2016. Statistics: Methodology, 1–23) which is derived from the bagplot; however; it is able to provide a unique measure of outlyingness and a means to adjust outlying observations based on this measure.\n Furthermore, we extend our robust bivariate chain-ladder approach to an N-dimensional framework. The implementation of the methods, especially beyond bivariate, is not trivial. This is illustrated on a trivariate data set from Australian general insurers and results under the different outlier detection and treatment mechanisms are compared.","PeriodicalId":44135,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Actuarial Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection and treatment of outliers for multivariate robust loss reserving\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Avanzi, Mark Lavender, G. Taylor, Bernard Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1748499523000155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Traditional techniques for calculating outstanding claim liabilities such as the chain-ladder are notoriously at risk of being distorted by outliers in past claims data. Unfortunately, the literature in robust methods of reserving is scant, with notable exceptions such as Verdonck & Debruyne (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48, 85–98) and Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). In this paper, we put forward two alternative robust bivariate chain-ladder techniques to extend the approach of Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). The first technique is based on Adjusted Outlyingness (Hubert & Van der Veeken, 2008. Journal of Chemometrics,22, 235–246) and explicitly incorporates skewness into the analysis while providing a unique measure of outlyingness for each observation. The second technique is based on bagdistance (Hubert et al., 2016. Statistics: Methodology, 1–23) which is derived from the bagplot; however; it is able to provide a unique measure of outlyingness and a means to adjust outlying observations based on this measure.\\n Furthermore, we extend our robust bivariate chain-ladder approach to an N-dimensional framework. The implementation of the methods, especially beyond bivariate, is not trivial. This is illustrated on a trivariate data set from Australian general insurers and results under the different outlier detection and treatment mechanisms are compared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Actuarial Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Actuarial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499523000155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Actuarial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499523000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

众所周知,计算未偿索赔负债的传统方法,如链梯法,存在被过去索赔数据中的异常值扭曲的风险。不幸的是,除了Verdonck & Debruyne (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48, 85-98)和Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188-193)等显著的例外,关于稳健储备方法的文献很少。在本文中,我们提出了两种可选的鲁棒二元链梯技术来扩展Verdonck和Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188-193)的方法。第一种技术是基于调整的离群度(Hubert & Van der Veeken, 2008)。化学计量学杂志,22,235-246),并明确地将偏度纳入分析,同时为每个观察提供独特的离群度测量。第二种技术是基于包距(Hubert et al., 2016)。统计:方法,1-23),来源于袋图;然而;它能够提供一种独特的离群度度量和一种基于该度量调整离群观测值的方法。此外,我们将我们的鲁棒二元链梯方法扩展到n维框架。这些方法的实现,特别是超越二元变量的实现,不是微不足道的。这是由澳大利亚一般保险公司的三变量数据集说明的,并比较了不同异常值检测和治疗机制下的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection and treatment of outliers for multivariate robust loss reserving
Traditional techniques for calculating outstanding claim liabilities such as the chain-ladder are notoriously at risk of being distorted by outliers in past claims data. Unfortunately, the literature in robust methods of reserving is scant, with notable exceptions such as Verdonck & Debruyne (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48, 85–98) and Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). In this paper, we put forward two alternative robust bivariate chain-ladder techniques to extend the approach of Verdonck & Van Wouwe (2011, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,49, 188–193). The first technique is based on Adjusted Outlyingness (Hubert & Van der Veeken, 2008. Journal of Chemometrics,22, 235–246) and explicitly incorporates skewness into the analysis while providing a unique measure of outlyingness for each observation. The second technique is based on bagdistance (Hubert et al., 2016. Statistics: Methodology, 1–23) which is derived from the bagplot; however; it is able to provide a unique measure of outlyingness and a means to adjust outlying observations based on this measure. Furthermore, we extend our robust bivariate chain-ladder approach to an N-dimensional framework. The implementation of the methods, especially beyond bivariate, is not trivial. This is illustrated on a trivariate data set from Australian general insurers and results under the different outlier detection and treatment mechanisms are compared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信