评价氨暴露水平的实时监测检测和主动抽样测量的比较研究。

IF 1.2 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Patricia Battais, F. Bonthoux, S. Lechêne, Juliette Kunz-Iffli, Nathalie Monta, Jérôme Grosjean, Philippe Duquenne
{"title":"评价氨暴露水平的实时监测检测和主动抽样测量的比较研究。","authors":"Patricia Battais, F. Bonthoux, S. Lechêne, Juliette Kunz-Iffli, Nathalie Monta, Jérôme Grosjean, Philippe Duquenne","doi":"10.31025/2611-4135/2022.16224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Occupational exposure to ammonia is an important issue in the waste management sector, especially in composting and anaerobic digestion plants. In this sector, operators can be exposed to high contents of ammonia which is important to assess. The aim of this work was to provide a comparative study of two ammonia measurement techniques in the workplace air. The first one is an offline active collection of air samples that are then brought to laboratory for analysis and whose results are comparable to OELs. The second one involves real-time monitoring which is easy to deploy, allows for data to be processed both quickly and directly and to explain exposure peaks relative to workers’ activity. These two techniques were simultaneously deployed in several anaerobic digestion-composting plants to assess operators’ potential exposure to ammonia, and data were compared. Results show that there are linear correlations between concentrations obtained from both methods, with a trend to overestimate real concentrations in ammonia for several real-time detectors. This trend could however be explained by the time needed for exposure peaks to decrease. Real-time gas detectors, if cautiously used, are good investigation tools to quickly confirm or invalidate the presence of ammonia in the workplace atmosphere, and for both studying and optimising the workplace. The combination of both online and offline methods facilitates the analysis of a work area or station in order to improve the efficiency of prevention measures and to provide an accurate quantification of operators’ exposure for compliance checking of OELs.","PeriodicalId":44191,"journal":{"name":"Detritus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of real-time monitoring detection and active sampling measurements in evaluating exposure levels to ammonia.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Battais, F. Bonthoux, S. Lechêne, Juliette Kunz-Iffli, Nathalie Monta, Jérôme Grosjean, Philippe Duquenne\",\"doi\":\"10.31025/2611-4135/2022.16224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Occupational exposure to ammonia is an important issue in the waste management sector, especially in composting and anaerobic digestion plants. In this sector, operators can be exposed to high contents of ammonia which is important to assess. The aim of this work was to provide a comparative study of two ammonia measurement techniques in the workplace air. The first one is an offline active collection of air samples that are then brought to laboratory for analysis and whose results are comparable to OELs. The second one involves real-time monitoring which is easy to deploy, allows for data to be processed both quickly and directly and to explain exposure peaks relative to workers’ activity. These two techniques were simultaneously deployed in several anaerobic digestion-composting plants to assess operators’ potential exposure to ammonia, and data were compared. Results show that there are linear correlations between concentrations obtained from both methods, with a trend to overestimate real concentrations in ammonia for several real-time detectors. This trend could however be explained by the time needed for exposure peaks to decrease. Real-time gas detectors, if cautiously used, are good investigation tools to quickly confirm or invalidate the presence of ammonia in the workplace atmosphere, and for both studying and optimising the workplace. The combination of both online and offline methods facilitates the analysis of a work area or station in order to improve the efficiency of prevention measures and to provide an accurate quantification of operators’ exposure for compliance checking of OELs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Detritus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Detritus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2022.16224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Detritus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2022.16224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业暴露于氨是废物管理部门的一个重要问题,特别是在堆肥和厌氧消化工厂。在这个部门,操作人员可能会接触到高含量的氨,这对评估很重要。本研究的目的是对工作场所空气中两种氨测量技术进行比较研究。第一个是离线主动收集空气样本,然后将其带到实验室进行分析,其结果与OELs相当。第二种方法涉及实时监控,易于部署,可以快速直接地处理数据,并解释与工人活动相关的暴露峰值。这两种技术同时应用于几个厌氧消化-堆肥工厂,以评估操作人员对氨的潜在暴露,并对数据进行比较。结果表明,两种方法得到的浓度之间存在线性相关关系,对几种实时检测器有高估氨实际浓度的趋势。然而,这种趋势可以用暴露峰值减少所需的时间来解释。如果谨慎使用,实时气体探测器是很好的调查工具,可以快速确认或确认工作场所大气中氨的存在,并用于研究和优化工作场所。在线和离线方法相结合,便于对工作区域或工位进行分析,以提高预防措施的效率,并为检查OELs的合规性提供操作员暴露的准确量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of real-time monitoring detection and active sampling measurements in evaluating exposure levels to ammonia.
Occupational exposure to ammonia is an important issue in the waste management sector, especially in composting and anaerobic digestion plants. In this sector, operators can be exposed to high contents of ammonia which is important to assess. The aim of this work was to provide a comparative study of two ammonia measurement techniques in the workplace air. The first one is an offline active collection of air samples that are then brought to laboratory for analysis and whose results are comparable to OELs. The second one involves real-time monitoring which is easy to deploy, allows for data to be processed both quickly and directly and to explain exposure peaks relative to workers’ activity. These two techniques were simultaneously deployed in several anaerobic digestion-composting plants to assess operators’ potential exposure to ammonia, and data were compared. Results show that there are linear correlations between concentrations obtained from both methods, with a trend to overestimate real concentrations in ammonia for several real-time detectors. This trend could however be explained by the time needed for exposure peaks to decrease. Real-time gas detectors, if cautiously used, are good investigation tools to quickly confirm or invalidate the presence of ammonia in the workplace atmosphere, and for both studying and optimising the workplace. The combination of both online and offline methods facilitates the analysis of a work area or station in order to improve the efficiency of prevention measures and to provide an accurate quantification of operators’ exposure for compliance checking of OELs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Detritus
Detritus ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
45
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信