“我需要什么反馈?””

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Diacritica Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.21814/DIACRITICA.444
Liliana P. L. Gonçalves, Carlos Figueiredo, J. Jatobá
{"title":"“我需要什么反馈?””","authors":"Liliana P. L. Gonçalves, Carlos Figueiredo, J. Jatobá","doi":"10.21814/DIACRITICA.444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most recent didactic and pedagogical proposals consider that it is essential to provide some kind of feedback to students’ written works (Hyland 2003; Sheen 2010), not only for learners to develop their writing skills but also to improve their own proficiency in the language-culture. In this sense, the present article will first present different types of feedback that can be given to students, namely written feedback from the teacher, face-to-face teacher-student encounter and feedback from classmates (Hyland 2003; Liu & Hansen 2002). Secondly, we will analyze written works carried out by our B1 level students, focusing our attention on the teacher’s written feedback in order to understand if there is any impact on the learners’ texts improvement. We also intend to understand which feedback will be the most effective one to achieve the so said improvement. Among the conclusions we were able to reach, there is a clear improvement in the learners’ texts after the rewriting phase has been completed. We also concluded that, for intermediate levels, multiple or mixed written feedback is the most effective one in the correction/rewriting process.","PeriodicalId":33760,"journal":{"name":"Diacritica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘WHAT DO I NEED FEEDBACK FOR?’\",\"authors\":\"Liliana P. L. Gonçalves, Carlos Figueiredo, J. Jatobá\",\"doi\":\"10.21814/DIACRITICA.444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most recent didactic and pedagogical proposals consider that it is essential to provide some kind of feedback to students’ written works (Hyland 2003; Sheen 2010), not only for learners to develop their writing skills but also to improve their own proficiency in the language-culture. In this sense, the present article will first present different types of feedback that can be given to students, namely written feedback from the teacher, face-to-face teacher-student encounter and feedback from classmates (Hyland 2003; Liu & Hansen 2002). Secondly, we will analyze written works carried out by our B1 level students, focusing our attention on the teacher’s written feedback in order to understand if there is any impact on the learners’ texts improvement. We also intend to understand which feedback will be the most effective one to achieve the so said improvement. Among the conclusions we were able to reach, there is a clear improvement in the learners’ texts after the rewriting phase has been completed. We also concluded that, for intermediate levels, multiple or mixed written feedback is the most effective one in the correction/rewriting process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diacritica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diacritica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21814/DIACRITICA.444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diacritica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21814/DIACRITICA.444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最新的教学和教学建议认为,对学生的书面作品提供某种反馈是至关重要的(Hyland 2003;Sheen 2010),这不仅有助于学习者发展他们的写作技能,也有助于提高他们自己对语言文化的熟练程度。从这个意义上讲,本文将首先介绍可以给予学生的不同类型的反馈,即来自老师的书面反馈、面对面的师生交流和来自同学的反馈(Hyland 2003;刘和汉森,2002年)。其次,我们将分析B1级学生的书面作品,将注意力集中在老师的书面反馈上,以了解是否对学习者的文本改进有任何影响。我们还打算了解哪种反馈将是实现上述改进的最有效反馈。在我们能够得出的结论中,重写阶段完成后,学习者的文本有了明显的改善。我们还得出结论,对于中等水平,多重或混合书面反馈是纠正/重写过程中最有效的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘WHAT DO I NEED FEEDBACK FOR?’
The most recent didactic and pedagogical proposals consider that it is essential to provide some kind of feedback to students’ written works (Hyland 2003; Sheen 2010), not only for learners to develop their writing skills but also to improve their own proficiency in the language-culture. In this sense, the present article will first present different types of feedback that can be given to students, namely written feedback from the teacher, face-to-face teacher-student encounter and feedback from classmates (Hyland 2003; Liu & Hansen 2002). Secondly, we will analyze written works carried out by our B1 level students, focusing our attention on the teacher’s written feedback in order to understand if there is any impact on the learners’ texts improvement. We also intend to understand which feedback will be the most effective one to achieve the so said improvement. Among the conclusions we were able to reach, there is a clear improvement in the learners’ texts after the rewriting phase has been completed. We also concluded that, for intermediate levels, multiple or mixed written feedback is the most effective one in the correction/rewriting process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diacritica
Diacritica Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信