达纳·斯皮奥塔与真实之后的小说

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
A. Colton
{"title":"达纳·斯皮奥塔与真实之后的小说","authors":"A. Colton","doi":"10.1353/arq.2019.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:New Sincerity literature is thought to succeed postmodern fiction with formally conventional narratives centered on dilemmas of alienation and communication and the difficulty of conveying one's inner life to others amid late or neoliberal capitalism. A major author of the New Sincerity, Dana Spiotta has examined such dilemmas in her four novels. This article proposes that her most recent, Innocents and Others (2016), signals an abrupt end to the New Sincerity and effectively retheorizes the periodization of recent US fiction. Tracing the unexpected deployment of postmodern epistemologies and aesthetics by the novel's central character, the article contends that Spiotta marks the New Sincerity as having reached an ironically postmodern state of exhaustion. In doing so, Spiotta discloses an atypical theory of periodization that rejects the antipathies that characterize recent literary history, emphasizing instead fiction's own involvement with the discourses that make legible literary-historical tensions.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"75 1","pages":"29 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/arq.2019.0019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dana Spiotta and the Novel after Authenticity\",\"authors\":\"A. Colton\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/arq.2019.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:New Sincerity literature is thought to succeed postmodern fiction with formally conventional narratives centered on dilemmas of alienation and communication and the difficulty of conveying one's inner life to others amid late or neoliberal capitalism. A major author of the New Sincerity, Dana Spiotta has examined such dilemmas in her four novels. This article proposes that her most recent, Innocents and Others (2016), signals an abrupt end to the New Sincerity and effectively retheorizes the periodization of recent US fiction. Tracing the unexpected deployment of postmodern epistemologies and aesthetics by the novel's central character, the article contends that Spiotta marks the New Sincerity as having reached an ironically postmodern state of exhaustion. In doing so, Spiotta discloses an atypical theory of periodization that rejects the antipathies that characterize recent literary history, emphasizing instead fiction's own involvement with the discourses that make legible literary-historical tensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/arq.2019.0019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2019.0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2019.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:新真诚文学被认为是后现代小说的继承,其形式传统的叙事以异化和沟通的困境以及在晚期或新自由主义资本主义中向他人传达内心生活的困难为中心。作为《新真诚》的主要作者,达纳·斯皮奥塔在她的四部小说中探讨了这种困境。本文认为,她的最新作品《无辜者与他人》(2016)标志着新真诚主义的突然结束,并有效地重新思考了美国近期小说的分期问题。文章追溯了小说中心人物对后现代认识论和美学的意外部署,认为斯皮奥塔标志着《新真诚》达到了具有讽刺意味的后现代疲惫状态。在这样做的过程中,斯皮奥塔揭示了一种非典型的分期理论,该理论拒绝了现代文学史上的反感,而是强调小说本身与使文学历史张力清晰可见的话语的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dana Spiotta and the Novel after Authenticity
Abstract:New Sincerity literature is thought to succeed postmodern fiction with formally conventional narratives centered on dilemmas of alienation and communication and the difficulty of conveying one's inner life to others amid late or neoliberal capitalism. A major author of the New Sincerity, Dana Spiotta has examined such dilemmas in her four novels. This article proposes that her most recent, Innocents and Others (2016), signals an abrupt end to the New Sincerity and effectively retheorizes the periodization of recent US fiction. Tracing the unexpected deployment of postmodern epistemologies and aesthetics by the novel's central character, the article contends that Spiotta marks the New Sincerity as having reached an ironically postmodern state of exhaustion. In doing so, Spiotta discloses an atypical theory of periodization that rejects the antipathies that characterize recent literary history, emphasizing instead fiction's own involvement with the discourses that make legible literary-historical tensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arizona Quarterly
Arizona Quarterly LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信