贝尔福的狮子,马克斯·恩斯特的《美好的一周》和《过去的使用》

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE
Katie Hornstein
{"title":"贝尔福的狮子,马克斯·恩斯特的《美好的一周》和《过去的使用》","authors":"Katie Hornstein","doi":"10.1353/NCF.2021.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi's Lion of Belfort, a 11 × 22-meter sculpture made out of red sandstone, was erected at the foot of the citadel of the frontier town of Belfort in 1879. Associated versions were also exhibited at the Salon and subsequently installed at Place Denfert-Rochereau in Paris. As a nationalist monument to noble resistance (and defeat) as well as an implicit repudiation of the revolutionary spirit of the Commune, Bartholdi's sculpture took the form of the obdurately generalized symbol of the lion, which made it susceptible to unanticipated collective readings against the grain. I trace the resonances of the Lion of Belfort into the twentieth century, when the monument made a belated appearance as the protagonist in the first volume of Max Ernst's collage-novel, Une semaine de bonté (1933–34). Ernst's collage-novel proposes a retrospective reading of the collective revolutionary echoes of a counter-revolutionary monument across time. My paper asks what it means for a Third Republic monument to contend with the various political, class, and temporal boundaries of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. I argue that the reappearance of these leonine forms across time and in very different contexts offers a model for examining the unfinished business of nineteenth-century revolutionary history.","PeriodicalId":42524,"journal":{"name":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES","volume":"49 1","pages":"282 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/NCF.2021.0010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lion of Belfort, Max Ernst's Une semaine de bonté, and the Uses of the Past\",\"authors\":\"Katie Hornstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/NCF.2021.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi's Lion of Belfort, a 11 × 22-meter sculpture made out of red sandstone, was erected at the foot of the citadel of the frontier town of Belfort in 1879. Associated versions were also exhibited at the Salon and subsequently installed at Place Denfert-Rochereau in Paris. As a nationalist monument to noble resistance (and defeat) as well as an implicit repudiation of the revolutionary spirit of the Commune, Bartholdi's sculpture took the form of the obdurately generalized symbol of the lion, which made it susceptible to unanticipated collective readings against the grain. I trace the resonances of the Lion of Belfort into the twentieth century, when the monument made a belated appearance as the protagonist in the first volume of Max Ernst's collage-novel, Une semaine de bonté (1933–34). Ernst's collage-novel proposes a retrospective reading of the collective revolutionary echoes of a counter-revolutionary monument across time. My paper asks what it means for a Third Republic monument to contend with the various political, class, and temporal boundaries of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. I argue that the reappearance of these leonine forms across time and in very different contexts offers a model for examining the unfinished business of nineteenth-century revolutionary history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"282 - 304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/NCF.2021.0010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/NCF.2021.0010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/NCF.2021.0010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:1879年,弗雷德里克·奥古斯特·巴尔托尔迪(Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi)的《贝尔福之狮》(Lion of Belfort)由红砂岩制成,高11×22米。相关版本也在沙龙展出,随后安装在巴黎的Denfert Rochereau广场。作为崇高抵抗(和失败)的民族主义纪念碑,以及对公社革命精神的含蓄否定,巴尔托尔迪的雕塑采用了顽固的狮子象征的形式,这使得它容易受到意想不到的集体反对。我将贝尔福之狮的共鸣追溯到二十世纪,当时这座纪念碑作为马克斯·恩斯特的拼贴小说《Une semaine de bonté》(1933-34)的第一卷中的主人公姗姗来迟地出现了。恩斯特的拼贴小说提出了对反革命纪念碑的集体革命回声的回顾性阅读。我的论文问,第三共和国纪念碑与十九世纪和二十世纪初的各种政治、阶级和时间界限相抗衡意味着什么。我认为,这些利昂形式在不同的时间和背景下的再现,为审视19世纪革命史上未完成的事业提供了一个模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Lion of Belfort, Max Ernst's Une semaine de bonté, and the Uses of the Past
Abstract:Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi's Lion of Belfort, a 11 × 22-meter sculpture made out of red sandstone, was erected at the foot of the citadel of the frontier town of Belfort in 1879. Associated versions were also exhibited at the Salon and subsequently installed at Place Denfert-Rochereau in Paris. As a nationalist monument to noble resistance (and defeat) as well as an implicit repudiation of the revolutionary spirit of the Commune, Bartholdi's sculpture took the form of the obdurately generalized symbol of the lion, which made it susceptible to unanticipated collective readings against the grain. I trace the resonances of the Lion of Belfort into the twentieth century, when the monument made a belated appearance as the protagonist in the first volume of Max Ernst's collage-novel, Une semaine de bonté (1933–34). Ernst's collage-novel proposes a retrospective reading of the collective revolutionary echoes of a counter-revolutionary monument across time. My paper asks what it means for a Third Republic monument to contend with the various political, class, and temporal boundaries of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. I argue that the reappearance of these leonine forms across time and in very different contexts offers a model for examining the unfinished business of nineteenth-century revolutionary history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES
NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Nineteenth-Century French Studies provides scholars and students with the opportunity to examine new trends, review promising research findings, and become better acquainted with professional developments in the field. Scholarly articles on all aspects of nineteenth-century French literature and criticism are invited. Published articles are peer reviewed to ensure scholarly integrity. This journal has an extensive book review section covering a variety of disciplines. Nineteenth-Century French Studies is published twice a year in two double issues, fall/winter and spring/summer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信