乡土:19世纪中国君主重建的社会经济史

IF 0.5 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Gilbert Z. Chen
{"title":"乡土:19世纪中国君主重建的社会经济史","authors":"Gilbert Z. Chen","doi":"10.1353/jcr.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The study of Buddhist monastic reconstruction has long focused on the leading role played by well-connected literati and charismatic monks in periods of fervent Buddhist revival in the late Ming and late Qing respectively. This article seeks to redirect scholarly focus and give voice to clerics and institutions that are so far marginalized in the history of Chinese Buddhism. By using legal archives, this article examines how ordinary clerics, including Daoists, used locally available resources to finance temple reconstruction in nineteenth-century Sichuan. In particular, since Sichuan had rich coal deposits and timber reserves, they routinely tapped into these resources to fund reconstruction projects. However, such efforts tended to aggravate the clergy-laity relationship due to ecological and fengshui concerns. In this regard, reconstruction did not always build upon and lead to community consensus. By foregrounding the experience of less-known Buddhist clerics, the article questions the dominant narrative of monastic reconstruction and deepens our understanding of the complexity of institutional Buddhism in imperial China.摘要:學界關於佛教寺廟重建的研究長期聚焦在明末或清末佛教復興時期士紳和高僧的領導作用。與之相對,本文把目光轉向在佛教研究中被長期邊緣化的底層僧侶。通過利用檔案材料,本文探討十九世紀四川底層佛教和道教僧侶如何利用地方資源來籌措資金進行寺廟重建。尤其值得注意的是,因為四川煤炭和木材資源豐富,當地僧侶充分利用這些資源來為重建提供資金支持。但是,由於生態和風水因素的影響,這種做法有可能導致僧俗關係的惡化。因此,寺廟重加並不一定建立在地方社會共識的基礎上,也不一定必然會促進僧俗關係的改善。通過視角轉移,本文對現有寺廟重建的敘事提出質疑,藉此加深學界對於帝製晚期製度性佛教的認識。","PeriodicalId":53120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Religions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Matters: A Socioeconomic History of Monastic Reconstruction in Nineteenth-Century China\",\"authors\":\"Gilbert Z. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jcr.2022.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The study of Buddhist monastic reconstruction has long focused on the leading role played by well-connected literati and charismatic monks in periods of fervent Buddhist revival in the late Ming and late Qing respectively. This article seeks to redirect scholarly focus and give voice to clerics and institutions that are so far marginalized in the history of Chinese Buddhism. By using legal archives, this article examines how ordinary clerics, including Daoists, used locally available resources to finance temple reconstruction in nineteenth-century Sichuan. In particular, since Sichuan had rich coal deposits and timber reserves, they routinely tapped into these resources to fund reconstruction projects. However, such efforts tended to aggravate the clergy-laity relationship due to ecological and fengshui concerns. In this regard, reconstruction did not always build upon and lead to community consensus. By foregrounding the experience of less-known Buddhist clerics, the article questions the dominant narrative of monastic reconstruction and deepens our understanding of the complexity of institutional Buddhism in imperial China.摘要:學界關於佛教寺廟重建的研究長期聚焦在明末或清末佛教復興時期士紳和高僧的領導作用。與之相對,本文把目光轉向在佛教研究中被長期邊緣化的底層僧侶。通過利用檔案材料,本文探討十九世紀四川底層佛教和道教僧侶如何利用地方資源來籌措資金進行寺廟重建。尤其值得注意的是,因為四川煤炭和木材資源豐富,當地僧侶充分利用這些資源來為重建提供資金支持。但是,由於生態和風水因素的影響,這種做法有可能導致僧俗關係的惡化。因此,寺廟重加並不一定建立在地方社會共識的基礎上,也不一定必然會促進僧俗關係的改善。通過視角轉移,本文對現有寺廟重建的敘事提出質疑,藉此加深學界對於帝製晚期製度性佛教的認識。\",\"PeriodicalId\":53120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Religions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcr.2022.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcr.2022.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:长期以来,佛教寺院重建的研究重点分别是明末和清末佛教狂热复兴时期,有门路的文人和有感召力的僧人所起的主导作用。本文试图重新定位学术焦点,并为迄今为止在中国佛教史上被边缘化的僧侣和机构发声。本文通过使用法律档案,考察了19世纪四川普通神职人员(包括道士)如何利用当地可用的资源资助寺庙重建。特别是,由于四川拥有丰富的煤炭和木材储量,他们经常利用这些资源为重建项目提供资金。然而,由于对生态和风水的考虑,这种努力往往会加剧神职人员与世俗的关系。在这方面,重建并不总是建立和导致社区协商一致意见。通过突出不太知名的佛教僧侣的经历,本文对寺院重建的主导叙事提出了质疑,加深了我们对帝国中国制度佛教复杂性的理解。與之相對,本文把目光轉向在佛教研究中被長期邊緣化的底層僧侶。通過利用檔案材料,本文探討十九世紀四川底層佛教和道教僧侶如何利用地方資源來籌措資金進行寺廟重建。尤其值得注意的是,因為四川煤炭和木材資源豐富,當地僧侶充分利用這些資源來為重建提供資金支持。但是,由於生態和風水因素的影響,這種做法有可能導致僧俗關係的惡化。因此,寺廟重加並不一定建立在地方社會共識的基礎上,也不一定必然會促進僧俗關係的改善。通過視角轉移,本文對現有寺廟重建的敘事提出質疑,藉此加深學界對於帝製晚期製度性佛教的認識。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local Matters: A Socioeconomic History of Monastic Reconstruction in Nineteenth-Century China
Abstract:The study of Buddhist monastic reconstruction has long focused on the leading role played by well-connected literati and charismatic monks in periods of fervent Buddhist revival in the late Ming and late Qing respectively. This article seeks to redirect scholarly focus and give voice to clerics and institutions that are so far marginalized in the history of Chinese Buddhism. By using legal archives, this article examines how ordinary clerics, including Daoists, used locally available resources to finance temple reconstruction in nineteenth-century Sichuan. In particular, since Sichuan had rich coal deposits and timber reserves, they routinely tapped into these resources to fund reconstruction projects. However, such efforts tended to aggravate the clergy-laity relationship due to ecological and fengshui concerns. In this regard, reconstruction did not always build upon and lead to community consensus. By foregrounding the experience of less-known Buddhist clerics, the article questions the dominant narrative of monastic reconstruction and deepens our understanding of the complexity of institutional Buddhism in imperial China.摘要:學界關於佛教寺廟重建的研究長期聚焦在明末或清末佛教復興時期士紳和高僧的領導作用。與之相對,本文把目光轉向在佛教研究中被長期邊緣化的底層僧侶。通過利用檔案材料,本文探討十九世紀四川底層佛教和道教僧侶如何利用地方資源來籌措資金進行寺廟重建。尤其值得注意的是,因為四川煤炭和木材資源豐富,當地僧侶充分利用這些資源來為重建提供資金支持。但是,由於生態和風水因素的影響,這種做法有可能導致僧俗關係的惡化。因此,寺廟重加並不一定建立在地方社會共識的基礎上,也不一定必然會促進僧俗關係的改善。通過視角轉移,本文對現有寺廟重建的敘事提出質疑,藉此加深學界對於帝製晚期製度性佛教的認識。
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chinese Religions is an international, peer-reviewed journal, published under the auspices of the Society for the Study of Chinese Religions (SSCR). Since its founding, the Journal has provided a forum for studies in Chinese religions from a great variety of disciplinary perspectives, including religious studies, philology, history, art history, anthropology, sociology, political science, archaeology, and literary studies. The Journal welcomes original research articles, shorter research notes, essays, and field reports on all aspects of Chinese religions in all historical periods. All submissions need to undergo double-blind peer review before they can be accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信