美国新罕布什尔州牡蛎礁修复:二十年实践中的经验教训

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
R. Grizzle, K. Ward, Raymond A. Konisky, J. Greene, H. Abeels, R. Atwood
{"title":"美国新罕布什尔州牡蛎礁修复:二十年实践中的经验教训","authors":"R. Grizzle, K. Ward, Raymond A. Konisky, J. Greene, H. Abeels, R. Atwood","doi":"10.3368/er.39.4.260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) populations in New Hampshire were approaching historical low levels in the late 1990s when broadly supported oyster restoration projects were initiated. Since then, the state’s collaborative program has conducted approximately 20 projects. Most consisted of constructing a hard substrate (usually mollusc shells) reef base then adding live juvenile oysters (“spat-on-shell”) produced in remote setting tanks. Assessments conducted in 2013, 2015, and 2019 provided long-term (up to 13 years post-construction) data on success and identified potential improvements to the restoration protocol involving two design criteria: reef base and site location. All three long-term assessments found excessive base burial (sedimentation) at many sites, leading to attempts to balance base height, bottom area coverage, and available funds. The result for most projects was multiple, haphazardly positioned shell mounds extending < 0.5 m above the bottom. The site location process initially focused on areas where oyster reefs occurred historically, but after the 2013 assessment and subsequent field experiments, the focus changed to identifying areas with the highest potential for recruitment from wild oysters. This research, which involved three natural reefs over two years, found > 75% of total recruitment occurred < 400 m from the natural reefs. Most current restoration projects center around these two design criteria: multiple shell mound structure and proximity to a healthy natural reef. The New Hampshire experience thus far confirms the emphasis by others on the value of long-term assessments, but as is the case in most areas, much remains to be learned and accomplished.","PeriodicalId":11492,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Restoration","volume":"39 1","pages":"260 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oyster Reef Restoration in New Hampshire, USA: Lessons Learned During Two Decades of Practice\",\"authors\":\"R. Grizzle, K. Ward, Raymond A. Konisky, J. Greene, H. Abeels, R. Atwood\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/er.39.4.260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) populations in New Hampshire were approaching historical low levels in the late 1990s when broadly supported oyster restoration projects were initiated. Since then, the state’s collaborative program has conducted approximately 20 projects. Most consisted of constructing a hard substrate (usually mollusc shells) reef base then adding live juvenile oysters (“spat-on-shell”) produced in remote setting tanks. Assessments conducted in 2013, 2015, and 2019 provided long-term (up to 13 years post-construction) data on success and identified potential improvements to the restoration protocol involving two design criteria: reef base and site location. All three long-term assessments found excessive base burial (sedimentation) at many sites, leading to attempts to balance base height, bottom area coverage, and available funds. The result for most projects was multiple, haphazardly positioned shell mounds extending < 0.5 m above the bottom. The site location process initially focused on areas where oyster reefs occurred historically, but after the 2013 assessment and subsequent field experiments, the focus changed to identifying areas with the highest potential for recruitment from wild oysters. This research, which involved three natural reefs over two years, found > 75% of total recruitment occurred < 400 m from the natural reefs. Most current restoration projects center around these two design criteria: multiple shell mound structure and proximity to a healthy natural reef. The New Hampshire experience thus far confirms the emphasis by others on the value of long-term assessments, but as is the case in most areas, much remains to be learned and accomplished.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Restoration\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"260 - 273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Restoration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.39.4.260\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.39.4.260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

20世纪90年代末,新罕布什尔州的东部牡蛎(Crassostrea virginica)数量接近历史最低水平,当时启动了广泛支持的牡蛎恢复项目。从那时起,该州的合作项目已经进行了大约20个项目。大多数包括建造一个坚硬的基质(通常是软体动物的外壳)礁基,然后添加在远程设置的水槽中生产的活的幼年牡蛎(“吐在外壳上”)。2013年、2015年和2019年进行的评估提供了长期(施工后长达13年)的成功数据,并确定了修复方案的潜在改进,涉及两个设计标准:珊瑚礁基座和现场位置。所有三项长期评估都发现,许多遗址的基底埋藏(沉积)过多,导致人们试图平衡基底高度、底部区域覆盖率和可用资金。大多数项目的结果是多个位置随意的贝壳堆,延伸到底部以上不到0.5米。选址过程最初侧重于历史上曾出现牡蛎礁的地区,但在2013年的评估和随后的实地实验之后,重点转向了确定最有可能从野生牡蛎中招募的地区。这项研究对三个天然珊瑚礁进行了为期两年的研究,发现75%以上的招募发生在距离天然珊瑚礁不到400米的地方。目前的大多数修复项目都围绕着这两个设计标准:多壳土堆结构和接近健康的天然珊瑚礁。迄今为止新罕布什尔州的经验证实了其他人对长期评估价值的重视,但与大多数地区的情况一样,仍有许多工作需要学习和完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oyster Reef Restoration in New Hampshire, USA: Lessons Learned During Two Decades of Practice
Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) populations in New Hampshire were approaching historical low levels in the late 1990s when broadly supported oyster restoration projects were initiated. Since then, the state’s collaborative program has conducted approximately 20 projects. Most consisted of constructing a hard substrate (usually mollusc shells) reef base then adding live juvenile oysters (“spat-on-shell”) produced in remote setting tanks. Assessments conducted in 2013, 2015, and 2019 provided long-term (up to 13 years post-construction) data on success and identified potential improvements to the restoration protocol involving two design criteria: reef base and site location. All three long-term assessments found excessive base burial (sedimentation) at many sites, leading to attempts to balance base height, bottom area coverage, and available funds. The result for most projects was multiple, haphazardly positioned shell mounds extending < 0.5 m above the bottom. The site location process initially focused on areas where oyster reefs occurred historically, but after the 2013 assessment and subsequent field experiments, the focus changed to identifying areas with the highest potential for recruitment from wild oysters. This research, which involved three natural reefs over two years, found > 75% of total recruitment occurred < 400 m from the natural reefs. Most current restoration projects center around these two design criteria: multiple shell mound structure and proximity to a healthy natural reef. The New Hampshire experience thus far confirms the emphasis by others on the value of long-term assessments, but as is the case in most areas, much remains to be learned and accomplished.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Restoration
Ecological Restoration Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Ecological Restoration is a forum for people advancing the science and practice of restoration ecology. It features the technical and biological aspects of restoring landscapes, as well as collaborations between restorationists and the design professions, land-use policy, the role of education, and more. This quarterly publication includes peer-reviewed science articles, perspectives and notes, book reviews, abstracts of restoration ecology progress published elsewhere, and announcements of scientific and professional meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信