比值比作为衡量过度治疗的指标：应用于陪审团鹿肉

IF 1.4 4区社会学 Q1 LAW

Law Probability & Risk Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI:10.1093/lpr/mgad003

J. Kadane

{"title":"比值比作为衡量过度治疗的指标：应用于陪审团鹿肉","authors":"J. Kadane","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgad003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Odds ratios have several advantages over other methods of measuring the degree of under-representation of cognizable classes of potential jurors. In particular, its advantage over comparative disparity is that it does not measure the extent of under-representation of some groups against an aggregate that includes the very group in question. Odds ratios in jury analysis are directly interpretable as the factor by which one’s probability of being on the jury is advanced or diminished by membership in a specified group.","PeriodicalId":48724,"journal":{"name":"Law Probability & Risk","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Odds ratios as a measure of disproportionate treatment: application to jury venires\",\"authors\":\"J. Kadane\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/lpr/mgad003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Odds ratios have several advantages over other methods of measuring the degree of under-representation of cognizable classes of potential jurors. In particular, its advantage over comparative disparity is that it does not measure the extent of under-representation of some groups against an aggregate that includes the very group in question. Odds ratios in jury analysis are directly interpretable as the factor by which one’s probability of being on the jury is advanced or diminished by membership in a specified group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Probability & Risk\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Probability & Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgad003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Probability & Risk","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgad003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他衡量潜在陪审员可认知类别代表性不足程度的方法相比，比值比有几个优势。特别是，它相对于比较差异的优势在于，它不衡量某些群体代表性不足的程度，也不衡量包括该群体在内的总和。陪审团分析中的比值比可以直接解释为一个人加入陪审团的概率因加入特定群体而提高或降低的因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Odds ratios as a measure of disproportionate treatment: application to jury venires

Odds ratios have several advantages over other methods of measuring the degree of under-representation of cognizable classes of potential jurors. In particular, its advantage over comparative disparity is that it does not measure the extent of under-representation of some groups against an aggregate that includes the very group in question. Odds ratios in jury analysis are directly interpretable as the factor by which one’s probability of being on the jury is advanced or diminished by membership in a specified group.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Law Probability & Risk MATHEMATICSSTATISTICS & PROBABILITY&-STATISTICS & PROBABILITY

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

28.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Law, Probability & Risk is a fully refereed journal which publishes papers dealing with topics on the interface of law and probabilistic reasoning. These are interpreted broadly to include aspects relevant to the interpretation of scientific evidence, the assessment of uncertainty and the assessment of risk. The readership includes academic lawyers, mathematicians, statisticians and social scientists with interests in quantitative reasoning. The primary objective of the journal is to cover issues in law, which have a scientific element, with an emphasis on statistical and probabilistic issues and the assessment of risk. Examples of topics which may be covered include communications law, computers and the law, environmental law, law and medicine, regulatory law for science and technology, identification problems (such as DNA but including other materials), sampling issues (drugs, computer pornography, fraud), offender profiling, credit scoring, risk assessment, the role of statistics and probability in drafting legislation, the assessment of competing theories of evidence (possibly with a view to forming an optimal combination of them). In addition, a whole new area is emerging in the application of computers to medicine and other safety-critical areas. New legislation is required to define the responsibility of computer experts who develop software for tackling these safety-critical problems.