权力实验:奥拜亚与特立尼达宗教的重塑

IF 0.5 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES
Ahmad Greene-Hayes
{"title":"权力实验:奥拜亚与特立尼达宗教的重塑","authors":"Ahmad Greene-Hayes","doi":"10.1080/00064246.2022.2145596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"J. Brent Crosson’s Experiments with Power is, indeed, an experiment, and a successful one at that. A powerfully written, meticulously researched ethnography, Crosson offers an insightful way forward for thinking critically about the policing of Africanderived religions in the afterlife of slavery and colonialism in Trinidad and throughout the Americas. This policing is not a relic of the past, but as the spiritual workers in Crosson’s narrative argue, the past and the present are not only interconnected, but they blur. Pointedly, Crosson charts how the historical construction of the “thug” by the state and its allies has worked in tandem with the construction of the category of “the demonic,” such that criminalized Black people are also likened to “demons.” As I read Crosson’s theoretical analysis, especially in the first chapter “What Obeah Does Do,” I was reminded of former Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson’s grand jury testimony in 2014 that the slain Michael Brown, Jr.—whom he killed—was “like a demon.” In his narrative account, Crosson joins a rich discourse on the policing of Black people and Black people’s religions. Without question, policing is shaped by carcerality, and as Crosson shows, by carceral theologies at the helm of the category of “religion.” Antiblackness shapes the world as we know it, including policing, and “religion” is often shaped by antiblackness, and so as Crosson encourages, we must examine “what it excludes rather than [just] its recognized representations” (9). Religion and religious studies are confining discourses, and Black people are often their prisoners, seeking the freedom to believe, practice, and live religious lives not shaped by statecraft. Obeah, a criminalized, policed constellation of African-derived religious practices, has only recently been decriminalized in Trinidad as of 2000, though the stigma surrounding it persists throughout the","PeriodicalId":45369,"journal":{"name":"BLACK SCHOLAR","volume":"53 1","pages":"66 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiments with Power: Obeah and the Remaking of Religion in Trinidad\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Greene-Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00064246.2022.2145596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"J. Brent Crosson’s Experiments with Power is, indeed, an experiment, and a successful one at that. A powerfully written, meticulously researched ethnography, Crosson offers an insightful way forward for thinking critically about the policing of Africanderived religions in the afterlife of slavery and colonialism in Trinidad and throughout the Americas. This policing is not a relic of the past, but as the spiritual workers in Crosson’s narrative argue, the past and the present are not only interconnected, but they blur. Pointedly, Crosson charts how the historical construction of the “thug” by the state and its allies has worked in tandem with the construction of the category of “the demonic,” such that criminalized Black people are also likened to “demons.” As I read Crosson’s theoretical analysis, especially in the first chapter “What Obeah Does Do,” I was reminded of former Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson’s grand jury testimony in 2014 that the slain Michael Brown, Jr.—whom he killed—was “like a demon.” In his narrative account, Crosson joins a rich discourse on the policing of Black people and Black people’s religions. Without question, policing is shaped by carcerality, and as Crosson shows, by carceral theologies at the helm of the category of “religion.” Antiblackness shapes the world as we know it, including policing, and “religion” is often shaped by antiblackness, and so as Crosson encourages, we must examine “what it excludes rather than [just] its recognized representations” (9). Religion and religious studies are confining discourses, and Black people are often their prisoners, seeking the freedom to believe, practice, and live religious lives not shaped by statecraft. Obeah, a criminalized, policed constellation of African-derived religious practices, has only recently been decriminalized in Trinidad as of 2000, though the stigma surrounding it persists throughout the\",\"PeriodicalId\":45369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BLACK SCHOLAR\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"66 - 68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BLACK SCHOLAR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2022.2145596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK SCHOLAR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2022.2145596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

j·布伦特·克罗森的《权力的实验》确实是一次实验,而且是一次成功的实验。克罗森是一本文笔有力、研究细致的民族志,为批判性地思考特立尼达和整个美洲在奴隶制和殖民主义之后对非洲衍生宗教的监管提供了一条富有洞察力的道路。这种监管不是过去的遗迹,但正如克罗森叙事中的精神工作者所言,过去和现在不仅相互关联,而且模糊不清。克罗森尖锐地指出,国家及其盟友对“暴徒”的历史建构是如何与“恶魔”这一类别的建构协同作用的,因此,被定罪的黑人也被比作“恶魔”。当我阅读克罗森的理论分析,尤其是第一章“奥比ah Does Do”时,我想起了弗格森前警官达伦·威尔逊(Darren Wilson) 2014年在大陪审团的证词,他在证词中说,被他杀死的小迈克尔·布朗(Michael Brown jr .)“像个恶魔”。在他的叙述中,克罗森加入了关于黑人警察和黑人宗教的丰富论述。毫无疑问,警务是由残暴塑造的,正如克罗森所展示的,是由残暴的神学主导的“宗教”范畴。反黑人塑造了我们所知的世界,包括警察,而“宗教”也常常被反黑人所塑造,所以正如克罗森所鼓励的那样,我们必须审视“它所排斥的东西,而不仅仅是它公认的代表”(9)。宗教和宗教研究限制了话语,黑人往往是他们的囚犯,他们寻求信仰、实践和过宗教生活的自由,而不是被国家政治所塑造。Obeah是一种被定罪的、由警察管理的源自非洲的宗教活动,直到2000年,它才在特立尼达被合法化,尽管围绕它的污名一直存在于整个国家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiments with Power: Obeah and the Remaking of Religion in Trinidad
J. Brent Crosson’s Experiments with Power is, indeed, an experiment, and a successful one at that. A powerfully written, meticulously researched ethnography, Crosson offers an insightful way forward for thinking critically about the policing of Africanderived religions in the afterlife of slavery and colonialism in Trinidad and throughout the Americas. This policing is not a relic of the past, but as the spiritual workers in Crosson’s narrative argue, the past and the present are not only interconnected, but they blur. Pointedly, Crosson charts how the historical construction of the “thug” by the state and its allies has worked in tandem with the construction of the category of “the demonic,” such that criminalized Black people are also likened to “demons.” As I read Crosson’s theoretical analysis, especially in the first chapter “What Obeah Does Do,” I was reminded of former Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson’s grand jury testimony in 2014 that the slain Michael Brown, Jr.—whom he killed—was “like a demon.” In his narrative account, Crosson joins a rich discourse on the policing of Black people and Black people’s religions. Without question, policing is shaped by carcerality, and as Crosson shows, by carceral theologies at the helm of the category of “religion.” Antiblackness shapes the world as we know it, including policing, and “religion” is often shaped by antiblackness, and so as Crosson encourages, we must examine “what it excludes rather than [just] its recognized representations” (9). Religion and religious studies are confining discourses, and Black people are often their prisoners, seeking the freedom to believe, practice, and live religious lives not shaped by statecraft. Obeah, a criminalized, policed constellation of African-derived religious practices, has only recently been decriminalized in Trinidad as of 2000, though the stigma surrounding it persists throughout the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BLACK SCHOLAR
BLACK SCHOLAR ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Founded in 1969 and hailed by The New York Times as "a journal in which the writings of many of today"s finest black thinkers may be viewed," THE BLACK SCHOLAR has firmly established itself as the leading journal of black cultural and political thought in the United States. In its pages African American studies intellectuals, community activists, and national and international political leaders come to grips with basic issues confronting black America and Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信