斯科特·D·塞利格曼(Scott D.Seligman)的《1902年的犹太肉大战:移民家庭主妇与袭击纽约市的暴乱》(The Great Kosher Meat War of 1902:Immigrant Housewives and The Riots That Shook New York City)(评论)

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Melissa R. Klapper
{"title":"斯科特·D·塞利格曼(Scott D.Seligman)的《1902年的犹太肉大战:移民家庭主妇与袭击纽约市的暴乱》(The Great Kosher Meat War of 1902:Immigrant Housewives and The Riots That Shook New York City)(评论)","authors":"Melissa R. Klapper","doi":"10.1353/sho.2021.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewing The Great Kosher Meat War of 1902 in the summer of 2021, it is impossible not to think about the historical parallels between the “riots” of more than a century ago and the marches following the murder of George Floyd during the summer of 2020. Obviously the direct circumstances and the scale are not at all the same, but the spread of the protests beyond the initial location; the connections between local and national conditions; the conflation of protests and riots; the dismissal of instigating figures as naïfs in over their heads; the wildly varying media coverage; the pronouncements of government officials at the local, state, and national levels; and quite possibly the long-lasting impact of participation are, at the least, reminiscent of one another. Equally central to any review of Scott D. Seligman’s book is the bright light still cast by Paula E. Hyman’s pathbreaking article “Immigrant Women and Consumer Protest: The New York City Kosher Meat Boycott of 1902,” published in American Jewish History in 1980. This was an early example of American Jewish women’s history and has arguably remained one of the most influential scholarly articles in the field. While Seligman certainly fleshes out the story of the 1902 protests in much more detail than was possible in an article, it is unfortunate that he did not learn more from Hyman’s work than the basic narrative. Even in 1980, without the benefit of the decades of corroborating research to come, Hyman understood that the women she was writing about were savvy political actors who strategically deployed gender within economic and religious constraints to achieve their goals. When they worked with","PeriodicalId":21809,"journal":{"name":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":"287 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Great Kosher Meat War of 1902: Immigrant Housewives and the Riots That Shook New York City by Scott D. Seligman (review)\",\"authors\":\"Melissa R. Klapper\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sho.2021.0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewing The Great Kosher Meat War of 1902 in the summer of 2021, it is impossible not to think about the historical parallels between the “riots” of more than a century ago and the marches following the murder of George Floyd during the summer of 2020. Obviously the direct circumstances and the scale are not at all the same, but the spread of the protests beyond the initial location; the connections between local and national conditions; the conflation of protests and riots; the dismissal of instigating figures as naïfs in over their heads; the wildly varying media coverage; the pronouncements of government officials at the local, state, and national levels; and quite possibly the long-lasting impact of participation are, at the least, reminiscent of one another. Equally central to any review of Scott D. Seligman’s book is the bright light still cast by Paula E. Hyman’s pathbreaking article “Immigrant Women and Consumer Protest: The New York City Kosher Meat Boycott of 1902,” published in American Jewish History in 1980. This was an early example of American Jewish women’s history and has arguably remained one of the most influential scholarly articles in the field. While Seligman certainly fleshes out the story of the 1902 protests in much more detail than was possible in an article, it is unfortunate that he did not learn more from Hyman’s work than the basic narrative. Even in 1980, without the benefit of the decades of corroborating research to come, Hyman understood that the women she was writing about were savvy political actors who strategically deployed gender within economic and religious constraints to achieve their goals. When they worked with\",\"PeriodicalId\":21809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"287 - 289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2021.0038\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2021.0038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2021年夏天回顾1902年的犹太肉类大战,不可能不想到一个多世纪前的“骚乱”与2020年夏天乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀后的游行之间的历史相似之处。显然,直接情况和规模完全不同,但抗议活动的蔓延超出了最初的地点;地方与国情的联系;抗议和骚乱的结合;把煽动者当作naïfs在他们头上解雇;五花八门的媒体报道;公告:地方、州和国家各级政府官员的声明;很有可能,参与的长期影响至少会让人想起彼此。对于斯科特·d·塞利格曼这本书的任何评论,同样重要的是宝拉·e·海曼(Paula E. Hyman) 1980年发表在《美国犹太历史》(American Jewish History)上的开创性文章《移民妇女和消费者抗议:1902年纽约市犹太肉类抵制》(Immigrant Women and Consumer Protest: the New York City Kosher Meat Boycott)所投下的光芒。这是美国犹太妇女历史的早期例子,可以说是该领域最具影响力的学术文章之一。虽然塞利格曼确实比一篇文章更详细地充实了1902年抗议活动的故事,但不幸的是,他没有从海曼的作品中学到比基本叙述更多的东西。即使在1980年,没有经过几十年的实证研究,海曼也明白,她所写的女性是精明的政治演员,她们在经济和宗教约束下战略性地利用性别来实现自己的目标。当他们与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Great Kosher Meat War of 1902: Immigrant Housewives and the Riots That Shook New York City by Scott D. Seligman (review)
Reviewing The Great Kosher Meat War of 1902 in the summer of 2021, it is impossible not to think about the historical parallels between the “riots” of more than a century ago and the marches following the murder of George Floyd during the summer of 2020. Obviously the direct circumstances and the scale are not at all the same, but the spread of the protests beyond the initial location; the connections between local and national conditions; the conflation of protests and riots; the dismissal of instigating figures as naïfs in over their heads; the wildly varying media coverage; the pronouncements of government officials at the local, state, and national levels; and quite possibly the long-lasting impact of participation are, at the least, reminiscent of one another. Equally central to any review of Scott D. Seligman’s book is the bright light still cast by Paula E. Hyman’s pathbreaking article “Immigrant Women and Consumer Protest: The New York City Kosher Meat Boycott of 1902,” published in American Jewish History in 1980. This was an early example of American Jewish women’s history and has arguably remained one of the most influential scholarly articles in the field. While Seligman certainly fleshes out the story of the 1902 protests in much more detail than was possible in an article, it is unfortunate that he did not learn more from Hyman’s work than the basic narrative. Even in 1980, without the benefit of the decades of corroborating research to come, Hyman understood that the women she was writing about were savvy political actors who strategically deployed gender within economic and religious constraints to achieve their goals. When they worked with
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信