初中生对二维图形材料的误区

IF 1.3 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
M. T. Budiarto, S. Khabibah, A. Firdaus
{"title":"初中生对二维图形材料的误区","authors":"M. T. Budiarto, S. Khabibah, A. Firdaus","doi":"10.26858/JDS.V8I1.13316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a qualitative descriptive study that aims to describe the misconceptions of junior high school students on the material of flat shapes especially geometry of rectangular flat shapes. The subjects of this study were three students who had the most misconceptions from all students in the class. Students' misconceptions in this study were analyzed using a written misconception test with the CRI (Certainty of Response Index) method and continued with interviews to find out the cause of the misconceptions that occurred. Based on the results of data analysis the three subjects showed almost the same misconception. The first misconception experienced by students on rectangular flat figure material lies in the definition of rectangular flat figure. Students' misconceptions in defining lie in a flat shape that has the same side of length, four corners, and two diagonals that form a right angle. This shows that students only choose rectangular regular shapes. In addition, students also experience misconceptions in distinguishing between sides and ribs. The second misconception, lies in the concept of the properties of a rectangular flat shape especially rectangular. Students assume that the rectangle always has an elongated shape without regard to its properties. Furthermore, there is a misconception when showing another wake. Students assume that the ladder is an oblique rectangle. In addition, if a rectangle has a different position or irregular shape then it is not called a rectangle. The cause of the misconception that occurs is the ability to understand the concepts and images given to the problem","PeriodicalId":51086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Database Management","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misconception Of Junior High School Students On Two-Dimentional Figure Materials\",\"authors\":\"M. T. Budiarto, S. Khabibah, A. Firdaus\",\"doi\":\"10.26858/JDS.V8I1.13316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research is a qualitative descriptive study that aims to describe the misconceptions of junior high school students on the material of flat shapes especially geometry of rectangular flat shapes. The subjects of this study were three students who had the most misconceptions from all students in the class. Students' misconceptions in this study were analyzed using a written misconception test with the CRI (Certainty of Response Index) method and continued with interviews to find out the cause of the misconceptions that occurred. Based on the results of data analysis the three subjects showed almost the same misconception. The first misconception experienced by students on rectangular flat figure material lies in the definition of rectangular flat figure. Students' misconceptions in defining lie in a flat shape that has the same side of length, four corners, and two diagonals that form a right angle. This shows that students only choose rectangular regular shapes. In addition, students also experience misconceptions in distinguishing between sides and ribs. The second misconception, lies in the concept of the properties of a rectangular flat shape especially rectangular. Students assume that the rectangle always has an elongated shape without regard to its properties. Furthermore, there is a misconception when showing another wake. Students assume that the ladder is an oblique rectangle. In addition, if a rectangle has a different position or irregular shape then it is not called a rectangle. The cause of the misconception that occurs is the ability to understand the concepts and images given to the problem\",\"PeriodicalId\":51086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Database Management\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Database Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26858/JDS.V8I1.13316\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Database Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/JDS.V8I1.13316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究是一项定性描述性研究,旨在描述初中生对平面形状材料,特别是矩形平面形状几何的误解。这项研究的对象是班上所有学生中误解最多的三名学生。本研究采用书面误解测试和CRI(反应确定性指数)方法对学生的误解进行分析,并继续进行访谈,以找出出现误解的原因。根据数据分析结果,三位受试者表现出几乎相同的误解。学生对矩形平面图形材料的第一个误解是对矩形平面图的定义。学生在定义矩形平面图时的误解是对长度相同、四个角和两条形成直角的对角线的平面形状的误解。这表明学生只选择矩形规则形状。此外,学生在区分侧面和肋骨方面也会遇到误解。第二个误解,在于矩形平面形状的性质的概念,尤其是矩形。学生们认为矩形总是有一个细长的形状,而不考虑它的性质。此外,当显示另一个唤醒时,还有一种误解。学生们认为梯子是一个倾斜的矩形。此外,如果一个矩形有不同的位置或不规则的形状,那么它就不被称为矩形。产生误解的原因是理解问题的概念和图像的能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misconception Of Junior High School Students On Two-Dimentional Figure Materials
This research is a qualitative descriptive study that aims to describe the misconceptions of junior high school students on the material of flat shapes especially geometry of rectangular flat shapes. The subjects of this study were three students who had the most misconceptions from all students in the class. Students' misconceptions in this study were analyzed using a written misconception test with the CRI (Certainty of Response Index) method and continued with interviews to find out the cause of the misconceptions that occurred. Based on the results of data analysis the three subjects showed almost the same misconception. The first misconception experienced by students on rectangular flat figure material lies in the definition of rectangular flat figure. Students' misconceptions in defining lie in a flat shape that has the same side of length, four corners, and two diagonals that form a right angle. This shows that students only choose rectangular regular shapes. In addition, students also experience misconceptions in distinguishing between sides and ribs. The second misconception, lies in the concept of the properties of a rectangular flat shape especially rectangular. Students assume that the rectangle always has an elongated shape without regard to its properties. Furthermore, there is a misconception when showing another wake. Students assume that the ladder is an oblique rectangle. In addition, if a rectangle has a different position or irregular shape then it is not called a rectangle. The cause of the misconception that occurs is the ability to understand the concepts and images given to the problem
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Database Management
Journal of Database Management 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
23.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Database Management (JDM) publishes original research on all aspects of database management, design science, systems analysis and design, and software engineering. The primary mission of JDM is to be instrumental in the improvement and development of theory and practice related to information technology, information systems, and management of knowledge resources. The journal is targeted at both academic researchers and practicing IT professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信