应用深度学习模型改善幼儿骨龄评估:腕骨分析的意义

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sang-Un Kim, Saelin Oh, Kee-Hyoung Lee, C. Kang, K. Ahn
{"title":"应用深度学习模型改善幼儿骨龄评估:腕骨分析的意义","authors":"Sang-Un Kim, Saelin Oh, Kee-Hyoung Lee, C. Kang, K. Ahn","doi":"10.5812/iranjradiol-136311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Deep learning methods used for bone age assessment (BAA) mostly employ the whole hand or regional convolutional neural networks without carpal bones; therefore, their application is insufficient in young children. Objectives: This study aimed to improve the accuracy of BAA in young children by integrating a carpal bone analysis and to achieve a similar BAA accuracy for all age groups. Patients and Methods: A hybrid Greulich-Pyle (GP) and modified Tanner-Whitehouse deep learning model for BAA was trained by integrating an additional carpal bone analysis of an open dataset. A total of 453 hand radiographs from a single institution were selected for external validation. To create the reference standard, three human experts conducted a BAA, based on the GP Atlas, and then, interobserver agreement was evaluated. The model performance was estimated by comparing the mean absolute difference (MAD) and the root mean square error (RMSE) between the two BAA models, including one with a carpal bone analysis (M1) and one without a carpal bone analysis (M2), and the reference standard. The MAD of each model was compared between sex and age groups with respect to four major developmental stages, that is, pre-puberty, early and mid-puberty, late puberty, and post-puberty. Results: The M1 model showed a higher accuracy with a lower MAD (0.366; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.337 - 0.395) compared to the M2 model (0.388; 95% CI: 0.358 - 0.418) for all age groups, with a significant difference (P < 0.001). The RMSE values versus the reference standard were 0.483 and 0.505 years for the M1 and M2 models, respectively. According to sex and developmental stage distributions, the M1 model had a greater predictive ability compared to the M2 model for pre-pubertal patients, regardless of sex (P = 0.008 for males and P = 0.022 for females). Conclusion: Based on the present findings, the integration of a carpal bone analysis into the BAA model improved its accuracy, especially in young children.","PeriodicalId":50273,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Bone Age Assessment Using a Deep Learning Model in Young Children: Significance of Carpal Bone Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sang-Un Kim, Saelin Oh, Kee-Hyoung Lee, C. Kang, K. Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/iranjradiol-136311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Deep learning methods used for bone age assessment (BAA) mostly employ the whole hand or regional convolutional neural networks without carpal bones; therefore, their application is insufficient in young children. Objectives: This study aimed to improve the accuracy of BAA in young children by integrating a carpal bone analysis and to achieve a similar BAA accuracy for all age groups. Patients and Methods: A hybrid Greulich-Pyle (GP) and modified Tanner-Whitehouse deep learning model for BAA was trained by integrating an additional carpal bone analysis of an open dataset. A total of 453 hand radiographs from a single institution were selected for external validation. To create the reference standard, three human experts conducted a BAA, based on the GP Atlas, and then, interobserver agreement was evaluated. The model performance was estimated by comparing the mean absolute difference (MAD) and the root mean square error (RMSE) between the two BAA models, including one with a carpal bone analysis (M1) and one without a carpal bone analysis (M2), and the reference standard. The MAD of each model was compared between sex and age groups with respect to four major developmental stages, that is, pre-puberty, early and mid-puberty, late puberty, and post-puberty. Results: The M1 model showed a higher accuracy with a lower MAD (0.366; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.337 - 0.395) compared to the M2 model (0.388; 95% CI: 0.358 - 0.418) for all age groups, with a significant difference (P < 0.001). The RMSE values versus the reference standard were 0.483 and 0.505 years for the M1 and M2 models, respectively. According to sex and developmental stage distributions, the M1 model had a greater predictive ability compared to the M2 model for pre-pubertal patients, regardless of sex (P = 0.008 for males and P = 0.022 for females). Conclusion: Based on the present findings, the integration of a carpal bone analysis into the BAA model improved its accuracy, especially in young children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-136311\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-136311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用于骨龄评估(BAA)的深度学习方法大多采用全手或无腕骨的区域卷积神经网络;因此,它们在幼儿中的应用是不够的。目的:本研究旨在通过整合腕骨分析来提高幼儿BAA的准确性,并在所有年龄组中实现相似的BAA准确性。患者和方法:通过集成开放数据集的额外腕骨分析,训练了用于BAA的Greulich-Pyle(GP)和改良Tanner-Whithouse混合深度学习模型。从一个机构总共选择了453张手部射线照片进行外部验证。为了创建参考标准,三位人类专家基于GP Atlas进行了BAA,然后评估了观察者之间的一致性。通过比较两个BAA模型和参考标准之间的平均绝对差(MAD)和均方根误差(RMSE)来估计模型性能,其中一个模型进行了腕骨分析(M1),另一个模型没有进行腕骨分析。每个模型的MAD在性别和年龄组之间就四个主要发育阶段进行了比较,即青春期前、青春期早期和中期、青春期晚期和青春期后。结果:在所有年龄组中,M1模型显示出更高的准确性,MAD更低(0.366;95%置信区间(CI):0.337-0.395),与M2模型(0.388;95%可信区间:0.358-0.418)相比,具有显著差异(P<0.001)。M1和M2模型与参考标准的RMSE值分别为0.483和0.505岁。根据性别和发育阶段分布,与M2模型相比,M1模型对青春期前患者的预测能力更强,无论性别如何(男性P=0.008,女性P=0.022)。结论:根据目前的研究结果,将腕骨分析纳入BAA模型可以提高其准确性,尤其是在幼儿中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improvement of Bone Age Assessment Using a Deep Learning Model in Young Children: Significance of Carpal Bone Analysis
Background: Deep learning methods used for bone age assessment (BAA) mostly employ the whole hand or regional convolutional neural networks without carpal bones; therefore, their application is insufficient in young children. Objectives: This study aimed to improve the accuracy of BAA in young children by integrating a carpal bone analysis and to achieve a similar BAA accuracy for all age groups. Patients and Methods: A hybrid Greulich-Pyle (GP) and modified Tanner-Whitehouse deep learning model for BAA was trained by integrating an additional carpal bone analysis of an open dataset. A total of 453 hand radiographs from a single institution were selected for external validation. To create the reference standard, three human experts conducted a BAA, based on the GP Atlas, and then, interobserver agreement was evaluated. The model performance was estimated by comparing the mean absolute difference (MAD) and the root mean square error (RMSE) between the two BAA models, including one with a carpal bone analysis (M1) and one without a carpal bone analysis (M2), and the reference standard. The MAD of each model was compared between sex and age groups with respect to four major developmental stages, that is, pre-puberty, early and mid-puberty, late puberty, and post-puberty. Results: The M1 model showed a higher accuracy with a lower MAD (0.366; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.337 - 0.395) compared to the M2 model (0.388; 95% CI: 0.358 - 0.418) for all age groups, with a significant difference (P < 0.001). The RMSE values versus the reference standard were 0.483 and 0.505 years for the M1 and M2 models, respectively. According to sex and developmental stage distributions, the M1 model had a greater predictive ability compared to the M2 model for pre-pubertal patients, regardless of sex (P = 0.008 for males and P = 0.022 for females). Conclusion: Based on the present findings, the integration of a carpal bone analysis into the BAA model improved its accuracy, especially in young children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Radiology
Iranian Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Radiology is the official journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the Iranian Society of Radiology. It is a scientific forum dedicated primarily to the topics relevant to radiology and allied sciences of the developing countries, which have been neglected or have received little attention in the Western medical literature. This journal particularly welcomes manuscripts which deal with radiology and imaging from geographic regions wherein problems regarding economic, social, ethnic and cultural parameters affecting prevalence and course of the illness are taken into consideration. The Iranian Journal of Radiology has been launched in order to interchange information in the field of radiology and other related scientific spheres. In accordance with the objective of developing the scientific ability of the radiological population and other related scientific fields, this journal publishes research articles, evidence-based review articles, and case reports focused on regional tropics. Iranian Journal of Radiology operates in agreement with the below principles in compliance with continuous quality improvement: 1-Increasing the satisfaction of the readers, authors, staff, and co-workers. 2-Improving the scientific content and appearance of the journal. 3-Advancing the scientific validity of the journal both nationally and internationally. Such basics are accomplished only by aggregative effort and reciprocity of the radiological population and related sciences, authorities, and staff of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信