下一个引爆点?中国,大韩民国和黄海

IF 1.3
Asia Policy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/asp.2023.0008
O. Mastro
{"title":"下一个引爆点?中国,大韩民国和黄海","authors":"O. Mastro","doi":"10.1353/asp.2023.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"executive summary:This article evaluates China's strategy in the Yellow Sea by synthesizing relevant discourse, interests, capabilities, and behavior through an analysis of Chinese sources and the compilation of an original dataset of Chinese military activities in these waters.main argumentChina's Yellow Sea strategy has received less scholarly and policy attention than its approaches to the South China Sea, the East China Sea, and the Indian Ocean. However, China has significant economic and strategic reasons to prioritize its presence in these waters, including ongoing sovereignty disputes with the Republic of Korea (ROK). Chinese military exercises in the Yellow Sea have increased in recent years, with gray-zone activities playing a distant, secondary role to traditional military exercises. Moreover, China's propaganda approach has been relatively limited and moderate, and thus there is still time to shape Beijing's thinking and approach to these waters.policy implications• While Chinese maritime ambitions are arguably more limited in the Yellow Sea than the South and East China Seas, China's expanding military capabilities and subsequent uptick in military activity demand a greater policy focus there.• The U.S. should pursue a proactive hedging strategy toward China in the Yellow Sea. This could entail seeking cooperation with Beijing to address shared security threats, like North Korean WMD proliferation, while also preparing to respond strongly if China's ambitions change or if it begins a more extensive coercive campaign for exclusive control of these waters.• The U.S.-ROK alliance should adapt to China's increasing activities in the Yellow Sea by increasing joint monitoring, contingency planning, and consultations about the degree to which the alliance covers the protection of ROK forces, aircraft, and civilian vessels operating in the sea.","PeriodicalId":53442,"journal":{"name":"Asia Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Next Flashpoint? China, the Republic of Korea, and the Yellow Sea\",\"authors\":\"O. Mastro\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/asp.2023.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"executive summary:This article evaluates China's strategy in the Yellow Sea by synthesizing relevant discourse, interests, capabilities, and behavior through an analysis of Chinese sources and the compilation of an original dataset of Chinese military activities in these waters.main argumentChina's Yellow Sea strategy has received less scholarly and policy attention than its approaches to the South China Sea, the East China Sea, and the Indian Ocean. However, China has significant economic and strategic reasons to prioritize its presence in these waters, including ongoing sovereignty disputes with the Republic of Korea (ROK). Chinese military exercises in the Yellow Sea have increased in recent years, with gray-zone activities playing a distant, secondary role to traditional military exercises. Moreover, China's propaganda approach has been relatively limited and moderate, and thus there is still time to shape Beijing's thinking and approach to these waters.policy implications• While Chinese maritime ambitions are arguably more limited in the Yellow Sea than the South and East China Seas, China's expanding military capabilities and subsequent uptick in military activity demand a greater policy focus there.• The U.S. should pursue a proactive hedging strategy toward China in the Yellow Sea. This could entail seeking cooperation with Beijing to address shared security threats, like North Korean WMD proliferation, while also preparing to respond strongly if China's ambitions change or if it begins a more extensive coercive campaign for exclusive control of these waters.• The U.S.-ROK alliance should adapt to China's increasing activities in the Yellow Sea by increasing joint monitoring, contingency planning, and consultations about the degree to which the alliance covers the protection of ROK forces, aircraft, and civilian vessels operating in the sea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文通过对中国资料的分析和中国在黄海军事活动的原始数据集的汇编,综合了相关的话语、利益、能力和行为,评估了中国在黄海的战略。中国的黄海战略比其在南中国海、东中国海和印度洋的策略得到的学术和政策关注要少。然而,中国有重要的经济和战略理由优先考虑其在这些水域的存在,包括与韩国(韩国)正在进行的主权争端。近年来,中国在黄海的军事演习有所增加,与传统的军事演习相比,“灰色地带”的活动退居次要地位。此外,中国的宣传手段相对有限和温和,因此仍有时间塑造北京对这些水域的思维和做法。•与南中国海和东中国海相比,中国在黄海的海上野心可以说更为有限,但中国不断扩大的军事能力以及随后的军事活动增加,要求中国在黄海有更大的政策重点。•美国应该在黄海对中国采取积极的对冲策略。这可能需要寻求与北京方面的合作,以应对共同的安全威胁,比如朝鲜的大规模杀伤性武器扩散,同时也准备在中国的野心改变或开始更广泛的强制性行动以独占这些水域的情况下做出强烈回应。•美韩联盟应通过增加联合监测、应急计划和协商来适应中国在黄海日益增加的活动,并就联盟在多大程度上保护在黄海作业的韩国部队、飞机和民用船只进行磋商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Next Flashpoint? China, the Republic of Korea, and the Yellow Sea
executive summary:This article evaluates China's strategy in the Yellow Sea by synthesizing relevant discourse, interests, capabilities, and behavior through an analysis of Chinese sources and the compilation of an original dataset of Chinese military activities in these waters.main argumentChina's Yellow Sea strategy has received less scholarly and policy attention than its approaches to the South China Sea, the East China Sea, and the Indian Ocean. However, China has significant economic and strategic reasons to prioritize its presence in these waters, including ongoing sovereignty disputes with the Republic of Korea (ROK). Chinese military exercises in the Yellow Sea have increased in recent years, with gray-zone activities playing a distant, secondary role to traditional military exercises. Moreover, China's propaganda approach has been relatively limited and moderate, and thus there is still time to shape Beijing's thinking and approach to these waters.policy implications• While Chinese maritime ambitions are arguably more limited in the Yellow Sea than the South and East China Seas, China's expanding military capabilities and subsequent uptick in military activity demand a greater policy focus there.• The U.S. should pursue a proactive hedging strategy toward China in the Yellow Sea. This could entail seeking cooperation with Beijing to address shared security threats, like North Korean WMD proliferation, while also preparing to respond strongly if China's ambitions change or if it begins a more extensive coercive campaign for exclusive control of these waters.• The U.S.-ROK alliance should adapt to China's increasing activities in the Yellow Sea by increasing joint monitoring, contingency planning, and consultations about the degree to which the alliance covers the protection of ROK forces, aircraft, and civilian vessels operating in the sea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Policy
Asia Policy Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信