约翰·L·坎贝尔和约翰·A·霍尔,《资本主义需要什么:伟大经济学家被遗忘的教训》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2021),第299页,28.95美元(精装)。ISBN:9781108487825。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ola Innset
{"title":"约翰·L·坎贝尔和约翰·A·霍尔,《资本主义需要什么:伟大经济学家被遗忘的教训》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2021),第299页,28.95美元(精装)。ISBN:9781108487825。","authors":"Ola Innset","doi":"10.1017/S1053837222000220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marshallianism. The othermain idea of the author is related to the consequences of themigration of the most important economists of the time fromEurope to the United States. That migration, which occurred in the 1930s, due to thewell-known political circumstances, had de facto determined a process of theoretical “colonialism,” which had a double effect: on one side, it unified the American economic thought, and, on the other side, it shaped the present mainstream economics. I guess that this process likely will be described in the following Volume III. The combination of these two ideas is a key point for the community of historians of economics. By following Marchionatti’s suggestion, we might consider whether the origin of the present mainstream economics is truly a process of deconstruction and rebuilding of Marshallianism under the American eyes, or whether it has a more complicated origin that cannot ignore the complexity of the economic theory that spread between the two sides of the pond up to 1945 and that should be described in a more sophisticated way. Furthermore, as historians of economic ideas, shall we subscribe to the author’s “Eurocentric” vision? Or shall we make some distinctions that include the peculiarity of American economic thought? These questions remain open, and Volume III will likely help readers to add further relevant elements in order to discuss them and maybe to find some plausible answers as well as to address new ones to the community of historians of economics. Hence, we praise Marchionatti’s efforts and insights and acknowledge him for giving us this opportunity for an open discussion on these fundamental aspects of the history of economics.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John L. Campbell and John A. Hall, What Capitalism Needs: Forgotten Lessons of Great Economists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), pp. 299, $28.95 (hardcover). ISBN: 9781108487825.\",\"authors\":\"Ola Innset\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1053837222000220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Marshallianism. The othermain idea of the author is related to the consequences of themigration of the most important economists of the time fromEurope to the United States. That migration, which occurred in the 1930s, due to thewell-known political circumstances, had de facto determined a process of theoretical “colonialism,” which had a double effect: on one side, it unified the American economic thought, and, on the other side, it shaped the present mainstream economics. I guess that this process likely will be described in the following Volume III. The combination of these two ideas is a key point for the community of historians of economics. By following Marchionatti’s suggestion, we might consider whether the origin of the present mainstream economics is truly a process of deconstruction and rebuilding of Marshallianism under the American eyes, or whether it has a more complicated origin that cannot ignore the complexity of the economic theory that spread between the two sides of the pond up to 1945 and that should be described in a more sophisticated way. Furthermore, as historians of economic ideas, shall we subscribe to the author’s “Eurocentric” vision? Or shall we make some distinctions that include the peculiarity of American economic thought? These questions remain open, and Volume III will likely help readers to add further relevant elements in order to discuss them and maybe to find some plausible answers as well as to address new ones to the community of historians of economics. Hence, we praise Marchionatti’s efforts and insights and acknowledge him for giving us this opportunity for an open discussion on these fundamental aspects of the history of economics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837222000220\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837222000220","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马歇尔主义。作者的另一个主要观点与当时最重要的经济学家从欧洲迁移到美国的后果有关。这种发生在20世纪30年代的移民,由于众所周知的政治环境,事实上决定了一个理论上的“殖民主义”过程,这具有双重影响:一方面,它统一了美国的经济思想,另一方面,又塑造了当前的主流经济。我想这一过程可能会在下面的第三卷中描述。这两种观点的结合是经济学历史学家群体的一个关键点。根据马尔基奥纳蒂的建议,我们可以考虑当前主流经济学的起源是否真的是美国人眼中马歇尔主义的解构和重建过程,或者它是否有一个更复杂的起源,不能忽视1945年之前在池塘两岸传播的经济理论的复杂性,应该用更复杂的方式来描述。此外,作为经济思想的历史学家,我们是否同意作者的“欧洲中心”愿景?还是我们应该做出一些区分,包括美国经济思想的独特性?这些问题仍然悬而未决,第三卷可能会帮助读者添加更多的相关元素,以便进行讨论,也许会找到一些合理的答案,并向经济学历史学家群体提出新的答案。因此,我们赞扬马尔基奥纳蒂的努力和见解,并感谢他给了我们这个机会,就经济学史的这些基本方面进行公开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
John L. Campbell and John A. Hall, What Capitalism Needs: Forgotten Lessons of Great Economists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), pp. 299, $28.95 (hardcover). ISBN: 9781108487825.
Marshallianism. The othermain idea of the author is related to the consequences of themigration of the most important economists of the time fromEurope to the United States. That migration, which occurred in the 1930s, due to thewell-known political circumstances, had de facto determined a process of theoretical “colonialism,” which had a double effect: on one side, it unified the American economic thought, and, on the other side, it shaped the present mainstream economics. I guess that this process likely will be described in the following Volume III. The combination of these two ideas is a key point for the community of historians of economics. By following Marchionatti’s suggestion, we might consider whether the origin of the present mainstream economics is truly a process of deconstruction and rebuilding of Marshallianism under the American eyes, or whether it has a more complicated origin that cannot ignore the complexity of the economic theory that spread between the two sides of the pond up to 1945 and that should be described in a more sophisticated way. Furthermore, as historians of economic ideas, shall we subscribe to the author’s “Eurocentric” vision? Or shall we make some distinctions that include the peculiarity of American economic thought? These questions remain open, and Volume III will likely help readers to add further relevant elements in order to discuss them and maybe to find some plausible answers as well as to address new ones to the community of historians of economics. Hence, we praise Marchionatti’s efforts and insights and acknowledge him for giving us this opportunity for an open discussion on these fundamental aspects of the history of economics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信