重读尼泊尔风景:劳动力、水、农田和树木

IF 1.1 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
K. Marquardt, A. Pain, D. Khatri
{"title":"重读尼泊尔风景:劳动力、水、农田和树木","authors":"K. Marquardt, A. Pain, D. Khatri","doi":"10.1080/14728028.2020.1814875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper we use a patches approach to study changes in local land-use practices in response to constraints of labour and the increasing effects of climate change. Drawing on a mix of different participatory exercises and in-depth interviews we describe five categories of land use patches in two contrasting study areas in Nepal. We examine how decreasing access to land, labour and water generate socially differentiated local landscapes. Our findings point toward adaptive land-use responses that secure a subsistence production, encourage close integration between crop and tree land practices, but are supported by a remittance economy. This logic of local land use is not recognised by either agricultural or forestry institutions. We argue that an ongoing debate on land abandonment in Nepal is an example of how narrow sectoral understandings fail to comprehend adaptation practices in a complex landscape system.","PeriodicalId":12422,"journal":{"name":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","volume":"29 1","pages":"238 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14728028.2020.1814875","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-reading Nepalese landscapes: labour, water, farming patches and trees\",\"authors\":\"K. Marquardt, A. Pain, D. Khatri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14728028.2020.1814875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper we use a patches approach to study changes in local land-use practices in response to constraints of labour and the increasing effects of climate change. Drawing on a mix of different participatory exercises and in-depth interviews we describe five categories of land use patches in two contrasting study areas in Nepal. We examine how decreasing access to land, labour and water generate socially differentiated local landscapes. Our findings point toward adaptive land-use responses that secure a subsistence production, encourage close integration between crop and tree land practices, but are supported by a remittance economy. This logic of local land use is not recognised by either agricultural or forestry institutions. We argue that an ongoing debate on land abandonment in Nepal is an example of how narrow sectoral understandings fail to comprehend adaptation practices in a complex landscape system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"238 - 259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14728028.2020.1814875\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2020.1814875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2020.1814875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要在本文中,我们使用斑块法来研究当地土地利用实践的变化,以应对劳动力限制和气候变化日益严重的影响。通过不同的参与性练习和深入访谈,我们描述了尼泊尔两个对比研究区的五类土地利用斑块。我们研究了获得土地、劳动力和水的机会减少如何产生社会差异化的地方景观。我们的研究结果指出,适应性的土地利用对策可以确保自给生产,鼓励作物和林地实践之间的紧密结合,但得到汇款经济的支持。农业或林业机构都不承认当地土地利用的这种逻辑。我们认为,尼泊尔正在进行的关于土地废弃的辩论就是一个例子,说明狭隘的部门理解无法理解复杂景观系统中的适应做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-reading Nepalese landscapes: labour, water, farming patches and trees
ABSTRACT In this paper we use a patches approach to study changes in local land-use practices in response to constraints of labour and the increasing effects of climate change. Drawing on a mix of different participatory exercises and in-depth interviews we describe five categories of land use patches in two contrasting study areas in Nepal. We examine how decreasing access to land, labour and water generate socially differentiated local landscapes. Our findings point toward adaptive land-use responses that secure a subsistence production, encourage close integration between crop and tree land practices, but are supported by a remittance economy. This logic of local land use is not recognised by either agricultural or forestry institutions. We argue that an ongoing debate on land abandonment in Nepal is an example of how narrow sectoral understandings fail to comprehend adaptation practices in a complex landscape system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Forests, Trees and Livelihoods originated in 1979 under the name of the International Tree Crops Journal and adopted its new name in 2001 in order to reflect its emphasis on the diversity of tree based systems within the field of rural development. It is a peer-reviewed international journal publishing comments, reviews, case studies, research methodologies and research findings and articles on policies in this general field in order to promote discussion, debate and the exchange of information and views in the main subject areas of.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信