LithoVue Elite输尿管镜与一次性输尿管镜和可重复使用输尿管镜的比较:实验台和人体尸体研究

N. Bhojani, N. Shalabi, A. Reicherz, R. Herout, Kyle Searles, K. Wong, B. Chew
{"title":"LithoVue Elite输尿管镜与一次性输尿管镜和可重复使用输尿管镜的比较:实验台和人体尸体研究","authors":"N. Bhojani, N. Shalabi, A. Reicherz, R. Herout, Kyle Searles, K. Wong, B. Chew","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To compare the attributes of the next-generation LithoVue Elite (LVE, Boston Scientific Corporation) with current state-of-the-art single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscopes.\n \n \n \n LithoVue Elite is the latest single-use flexible ureteroscope with improved functionality and a novel ability to measure intrarenal pressure. In this study, we compare LVE with 3 single-use ureteroscopes (Pusen, WiScope, and Anqing) and 1 reusable ureteroscope (Olympus). A bench model was used to measure the physical characteristics (tip deflection and irrigation) and image quality (resolution, color accuracy, field of view, and latency). A human cadaveric model was used to score the maneuverability and ergonomics. This abstract shows the least square means from multiway ANOVAs used for analysis.\n \n \n \n The ureteroscopes showed a tip deflection ranging from 243° to 306° with LVE at 279°. The irrigation rates ranged from 28 to 44 mL/min with LVE at 40 ml/min. LVE had a resolution of 6.34 line pair/mm, while the other scopes ranged from 4.86 to 5.77 line pairs/mm. The color accuracy was quantified with Delta E, an image analysis variable, which ranged from 14 to 42 with LVE at 28. The field of view ranged from 55° to 89°, and LVE was at 89°. The image latency ranged from 41 to 92 ms with LVE at 58 ms. Finally, the maneuverability scores ranged from 3.8 to 4.1 of 5 with LVE scoring 4.1 while the ergonomics scores ranged from 2.4 to 4.8 with LVE scoring 4.4.\n \n \n \n LithoVue Elite had above average performance compared with single-use and reusable ureteroscopes and upper-range scores for resolution, field of view, maneuverability, and ergonomics. Accordingly, LVE shows promise; however, further research is needed to assess the impact of intrarenal pressure on the standard of care.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LithoVue Elite Compared With Single-Use and Reusable Ureteroscopes: A Bench and Human Cadaver Study\",\"authors\":\"N. Bhojani, N. Shalabi, A. Reicherz, R. Herout, Kyle Searles, K. Wong, B. Chew\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To compare the attributes of the next-generation LithoVue Elite (LVE, Boston Scientific Corporation) with current state-of-the-art single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscopes.\\n \\n \\n \\n LithoVue Elite is the latest single-use flexible ureteroscope with improved functionality and a novel ability to measure intrarenal pressure. In this study, we compare LVE with 3 single-use ureteroscopes (Pusen, WiScope, and Anqing) and 1 reusable ureteroscope (Olympus). A bench model was used to measure the physical characteristics (tip deflection and irrigation) and image quality (resolution, color accuracy, field of view, and latency). A human cadaveric model was used to score the maneuverability and ergonomics. This abstract shows the least square means from multiway ANOVAs used for analysis.\\n \\n \\n \\n The ureteroscopes showed a tip deflection ranging from 243° to 306° with LVE at 279°. The irrigation rates ranged from 28 to 44 mL/min with LVE at 40 ml/min. LVE had a resolution of 6.34 line pair/mm, while the other scopes ranged from 4.86 to 5.77 line pairs/mm. The color accuracy was quantified with Delta E, an image analysis variable, which ranged from 14 to 42 with LVE at 28. The field of view ranged from 55° to 89°, and LVE was at 89°. The image latency ranged from 41 to 92 ms with LVE at 58 ms. Finally, the maneuverability scores ranged from 3.8 to 4.1 of 5 with LVE scoring 4.1 while the ergonomics scores ranged from 2.4 to 4.8 with LVE scoring 4.4.\\n \\n \\n \\n LithoVue Elite had above average performance compared with single-use and reusable ureteroscopes and upper-range scores for resolution, field of view, maneuverability, and ergonomics. Accordingly, LVE shows promise; however, further research is needed to assess the impact of intrarenal pressure on the standard of care.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JU open plus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JU open plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了比较下一代LithoVue Elite (LVE, Boston Scientific Corporation)与当前最先进的一次性和可重复使用的柔性输尿管镜的特性。LithoVue Elite是最新的一次性柔性输尿管镜,具有改进的功能和测量肾内压的新能力。在本研究中,我们将LVE与3台一次性输尿管镜(Pusen, WiScope, Anqing)和1台可重复使用输尿管镜(Olympus)进行比较。使用台架模型来测量物理特性(尖端偏转和灌溉)和图像质量(分辨率、色彩精度、视野和延迟)。采用人体尸体模型对其可操作性和工效性进行评分。这个摘要显示了用于分析的多路方差分析的最小二乘均值。输尿管镜显示尖端偏转范围为243°至306°,LVE为279°。灌洗速率为28 ~ 44 mL/min, LVE为40 mL/min。LVE示波器分辨率为6.34线对/mm,其他示波器分辨率为4.86 ~ 5.77线对/mm。用图像分析变量Delta E量化颜色精度,其范围为14 ~ 42,LVE为28。视场范围55°~ 89°,LVE为89°。图像延迟为41 ~ 92 ms, LVE为58 ms。最后,机动性得分为3.8 - 4.1分(总分5分),LVE得分为4.1分;人体工程学得分为2.4 - 4.8分(总分4.4分)。与一次性使用输尿管镜和可重复使用输尿管镜相比,LithoVue Elite的性能高于平均水平,在分辨率、视野、机动性和人体工程学方面得分较高。因此,爱显示了希望;然而,需要进一步的研究来评估肾内压对护理标准的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LithoVue Elite Compared With Single-Use and Reusable Ureteroscopes: A Bench and Human Cadaver Study
To compare the attributes of the next-generation LithoVue Elite (LVE, Boston Scientific Corporation) with current state-of-the-art single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscopes. LithoVue Elite is the latest single-use flexible ureteroscope with improved functionality and a novel ability to measure intrarenal pressure. In this study, we compare LVE with 3 single-use ureteroscopes (Pusen, WiScope, and Anqing) and 1 reusable ureteroscope (Olympus). A bench model was used to measure the physical characteristics (tip deflection and irrigation) and image quality (resolution, color accuracy, field of view, and latency). A human cadaveric model was used to score the maneuverability and ergonomics. This abstract shows the least square means from multiway ANOVAs used for analysis. The ureteroscopes showed a tip deflection ranging from 243° to 306° with LVE at 279°. The irrigation rates ranged from 28 to 44 mL/min with LVE at 40 ml/min. LVE had a resolution of 6.34 line pair/mm, while the other scopes ranged from 4.86 to 5.77 line pairs/mm. The color accuracy was quantified with Delta E, an image analysis variable, which ranged from 14 to 42 with LVE at 28. The field of view ranged from 55° to 89°, and LVE was at 89°. The image latency ranged from 41 to 92 ms with LVE at 58 ms. Finally, the maneuverability scores ranged from 3.8 to 4.1 of 5 with LVE scoring 4.1 while the ergonomics scores ranged from 2.4 to 4.8 with LVE scoring 4.4. LithoVue Elite had above average performance compared with single-use and reusable ureteroscopes and upper-range scores for resolution, field of view, maneuverability, and ergonomics. Accordingly, LVE shows promise; however, further research is needed to assess the impact of intrarenal pressure on the standard of care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信