宾夕法尼亚州农村卫生模式:医院对农村社区全球支付的早期经验

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
D. Scanlon, M. Sciegaj, Laura J. Wolf, Jocelyn M. Vanderbrink, Bobbie L Johannes, Bethany Shaw, Kassidy Shumaker, Diane C Farley, Erin Kitt-Lewis, L. Davis
{"title":"宾夕法尼亚州农村卫生模式:医院对农村社区全球支付的早期经验","authors":"D. Scanlon, M. Sciegaj, Laura J. Wolf, Jocelyn M. Vanderbrink, Bobbie L Johannes, Bethany Shaw, Kassidy Shumaker, Diane C Farley, Erin Kitt-Lewis, L. Davis","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-20-00347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Goal: In January 2019, the first cohort of rural hospitals began to operate under the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model for all-payer prospective global budget reimbursement as part of a demonstration funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. Using information from primary source documents and interviews with key stakeholders, we sought to identify challenges and lessons learned throughout the design, development, and early implementation stages of the model. Methods: We relied on two qualitative research approaches: (1) review of primary source documents such as peer-reviewed publications and news accounts related to the model and (2) semistructured interviews with key staff and stakeholders, including current and former members of the Pennsylvania Department of Health, first-year applicant hospitals, technical assistance providers, and members of state and federal organizations and agencies familiar with the Pennsylvania and Maryland payment reform efforts for rural health and rural hospitals (N = 20). Principal Findings: We identified four primary attributes that innovative projects such as the model need: (1) a champion at the state and hospital level, significant cooperation across state agencies and between federal and state agencies, and support from nongovernment stakeholders; (2) ongoing engagement and education of all stakeholders, particularly related to rural health disparities, the challenges faced by rural hospitals (especially resource limitations), and the differences between rural and urban health and health service delivery; (3) realistic time lines, noting that stakeholder relationships with hospital leadership develop over many months; and (4) multistakeholder collaboration, because participating hospitals must have ongoing engagement with community members (i.e., consumers of healthcare), nonacute community partners, and other rural hospitals to foster a “rural health movement.” Applications to Practice: A successful Pennsylvania model holds promise for other states seeking to address the needs of rural populations and the hospitals that are vital to those communities. The lessons in this article can assist others in making the transition from volume to value in rural healthcare.","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"67 1","pages":"162 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model: Hospitals’ Early Experiences With Global Payment for Rural Communities\",\"authors\":\"D. Scanlon, M. Sciegaj, Laura J. Wolf, Jocelyn M. Vanderbrink, Bobbie L Johannes, Bethany Shaw, Kassidy Shumaker, Diane C Farley, Erin Kitt-Lewis, L. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHM-D-20-00347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY Goal: In January 2019, the first cohort of rural hospitals began to operate under the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model for all-payer prospective global budget reimbursement as part of a demonstration funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. Using information from primary source documents and interviews with key stakeholders, we sought to identify challenges and lessons learned throughout the design, development, and early implementation stages of the model. Methods: We relied on two qualitative research approaches: (1) review of primary source documents such as peer-reviewed publications and news accounts related to the model and (2) semistructured interviews with key staff and stakeholders, including current and former members of the Pennsylvania Department of Health, first-year applicant hospitals, technical assistance providers, and members of state and federal organizations and agencies familiar with the Pennsylvania and Maryland payment reform efforts for rural health and rural hospitals (N = 20). Principal Findings: We identified four primary attributes that innovative projects such as the model need: (1) a champion at the state and hospital level, significant cooperation across state agencies and between federal and state agencies, and support from nongovernment stakeholders; (2) ongoing engagement and education of all stakeholders, particularly related to rural health disparities, the challenges faced by rural hospitals (especially resource limitations), and the differences between rural and urban health and health service delivery; (3) realistic time lines, noting that stakeholder relationships with hospital leadership develop over many months; and (4) multistakeholder collaboration, because participating hospitals must have ongoing engagement with community members (i.e., consumers of healthcare), nonacute community partners, and other rural hospitals to foster a “rural health movement.” Applications to Practice: A successful Pennsylvania model holds promise for other states seeking to address the needs of rural populations and the hospitals that are vital to those communities. The lessons in this article can assist others in making the transition from volume to value in rural healthcare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"162 - 172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-20-00347\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-20-00347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目标:2019年1月,作为医疗保险和医疗补助创新中心资助的示范项目的一部分,第一批农村医院开始在宾夕法尼亚州农村卫生模式下运营,以实现所有付款人的预期全球预算报销。使用来自主要源文档的信息和与关键涉众的访谈,我们试图确定在整个模型的设计、开发和早期实现阶段所遇到的挑战和经验教训。方法:采用两种定性研究方法:(1)审查主要来源文件,如同行评审出版物和与模型相关的新闻报道;(2)对主要工作人员和利益相关者进行半结构化访谈,包括宾夕法尼亚州卫生部的现任和前任成员、第一年申请医院、技术援助提供者以及熟悉宾夕法尼亚州和马里兰州农村卫生和农村医院支付改革工作的州和联邦组织和机构的成员(N = 20)。主要发现:我们确定了创新项目(如模型)需要的四个主要属性:(1)州和医院层面的倡导者,州机构之间以及联邦和州机构之间的重要合作,以及非政府利益相关者的支持;(2)所有利益攸关方的持续参与和教育,特别是与农村卫生差距、农村医院面临的挑战(特别是资源限制)以及农村和城市卫生和卫生服务提供之间的差异有关;(3)现实的时间线,注意到利益相关者与医院领导层的关系发展了好几个月;(4)多方利益相关者合作,因为参与医院必须与社区成员(即医疗保健消费者)、非急性社区合作伙伴和其他农村医院进行持续接触,以促进“农村卫生运动”。实践应用:宾夕法尼亚州的成功模式为其他州寻求解决农村人口和对这些社区至关重要的医院的需求提供了希望。本文中的经验教训可以帮助其他人在农村医疗保健中实现从数量到价值的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model: Hospitals’ Early Experiences With Global Payment for Rural Communities
SUMMARY Goal: In January 2019, the first cohort of rural hospitals began to operate under the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model for all-payer prospective global budget reimbursement as part of a demonstration funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation. Using information from primary source documents and interviews with key stakeholders, we sought to identify challenges and lessons learned throughout the design, development, and early implementation stages of the model. Methods: We relied on two qualitative research approaches: (1) review of primary source documents such as peer-reviewed publications and news accounts related to the model and (2) semistructured interviews with key staff and stakeholders, including current and former members of the Pennsylvania Department of Health, first-year applicant hospitals, technical assistance providers, and members of state and federal organizations and agencies familiar with the Pennsylvania and Maryland payment reform efforts for rural health and rural hospitals (N = 20). Principal Findings: We identified four primary attributes that innovative projects such as the model need: (1) a champion at the state and hospital level, significant cooperation across state agencies and between federal and state agencies, and support from nongovernment stakeholders; (2) ongoing engagement and education of all stakeholders, particularly related to rural health disparities, the challenges faced by rural hospitals (especially resource limitations), and the differences between rural and urban health and health service delivery; (3) realistic time lines, noting that stakeholder relationships with hospital leadership develop over many months; and (4) multistakeholder collaboration, because participating hospitals must have ongoing engagement with community members (i.e., consumers of healthcare), nonacute community partners, and other rural hospitals to foster a “rural health movement.” Applications to Practice: A successful Pennsylvania model holds promise for other states seeking to address the needs of rural populations and the hospitals that are vital to those communities. The lessons in this article can assist others in making the transition from volume to value in rural healthcare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信