跟我们讨论魔法书1353—1430

Paweł A. Jeziorski
{"title":"跟我们讨论魔法书1353—1430","authors":"Paweł A. Jeziorski","doi":"10.15762/zh.2022.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Contribution to the Discussion on the Wismar Register of the Proscribed of 1353 –1430 The presented text is a contribution to the discussion on the latest edition of the Wismar register of the proscribed from 1353 –1430, published in 2019, and a themati-cally related collection of studies entitled Verfestungen, Stadtverweisungen, Urfehden. Kriminalität und ihre Ahndung in mittelalterlichen Hansestädten am Beispiel Wismars . The paper draws attention to those research issues that have been omitted or insuf-ficiently highlighted in the mentioned studies. In this regard the article mentions the rules for freeing oneself from proscription, the erroneous equation of proscription and banishment, and the means of deleting entries in registers of the proscribed. It was also noted that deleted entries generally occur in the most recent sections of registers of the proscribed. Their absence usually signals the sections of records from more distant times that have lost their relevance and thus no longer needed to be edited on an on-going basis. Moreover, the article emphasises the need for research into such issues as the social composition of the proscribed who appeared in the Wismar register, as well as their victims, female criminality, cases of relapse into crime among the proscribed, and the subsequent fate of such ‘recidivists’, or the attitude of municipal authorities to crimes committed against the representatives of the broadly understood social mar-gin. When researching these issues, the comparative perspective should be broadened to include registers of the proscribed from late medieval towns in the Kingdom of Poland and the Teutonic Order state in Prussia.","PeriodicalId":55678,"journal":{"name":"Zapiski Historyczne","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zur Diskussion über das Wismarer Verfestungsbuch 1353–1430\",\"authors\":\"Paweł A. Jeziorski\",\"doi\":\"10.15762/zh.2022.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Contribution to the Discussion on the Wismar Register of the Proscribed of 1353 –1430 The presented text is a contribution to the discussion on the latest edition of the Wismar register of the proscribed from 1353 –1430, published in 2019, and a themati-cally related collection of studies entitled Verfestungen, Stadtverweisungen, Urfehden. Kriminalität und ihre Ahndung in mittelalterlichen Hansestädten am Beispiel Wismars . The paper draws attention to those research issues that have been omitted or insuf-ficiently highlighted in the mentioned studies. In this regard the article mentions the rules for freeing oneself from proscription, the erroneous equation of proscription and banishment, and the means of deleting entries in registers of the proscribed. It was also noted that deleted entries generally occur in the most recent sections of registers of the proscribed. Their absence usually signals the sections of records from more distant times that have lost their relevance and thus no longer needed to be edited on an on-going basis. Moreover, the article emphasises the need for research into such issues as the social composition of the proscribed who appeared in the Wismar register, as well as their victims, female criminality, cases of relapse into crime among the proscribed, and the subsequent fate of such ‘recidivists’, or the attitude of municipal authorities to crimes committed against the representatives of the broadly understood social mar-gin. When researching these issues, the comparative perspective should be broadened to include registers of the proscribed from late medieval towns in the Kingdom of Poland and the Teutonic Order state in Prussia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zapiski Historyczne\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zapiski Historyczne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15762/zh.2022.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zapiski Historyczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15762/zh.2022.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对讨论1353–1430年被禁的Wismar登记册的贡献本文是对讨论2019年出版的最新版1353-1430年被禁Wismar登记簿以及题为Verfestungen、Stadtverweisungen、Urfehden的主题相关研究集的贡献。Kriminalität和Ahndung在威斯康星州的Hansestädten。本文提请注意上述研究中遗漏或未充分强调的研究问题。在这方面,该条提到了将自己从禁止中解放出来的规则,禁止和驱逐的错误等式,以及删除被禁止者登记册中的条目的方法。还有人指出,被删除的条目通常出现在被禁者登记册的最新部分。它们的缺失通常标志着来自遥远时代的记录部分已经失去了相关性,因此不再需要持续编辑。此外,该文章强调有必要研究诸如出现在Wismar登记册中的被禁者及其受害者的社会构成、女性犯罪、被禁者再次犯罪的案件以及这些“累犯”的后续命运等问题,或者市政当局对针对广泛理解的社会运动代表所犯下的罪行的态度。在研究这些问题时,应扩大比较视角,包括波兰王国中世纪晚期城镇和普鲁士条顿骑士团国家的被禁登记册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Zur Diskussion über das Wismarer Verfestungsbuch 1353–1430
A Contribution to the Discussion on the Wismar Register of the Proscribed of 1353 –1430 The presented text is a contribution to the discussion on the latest edition of the Wismar register of the proscribed from 1353 –1430, published in 2019, and a themati-cally related collection of studies entitled Verfestungen, Stadtverweisungen, Urfehden. Kriminalität und ihre Ahndung in mittelalterlichen Hansestädten am Beispiel Wismars . The paper draws attention to those research issues that have been omitted or insuf-ficiently highlighted in the mentioned studies. In this regard the article mentions the rules for freeing oneself from proscription, the erroneous equation of proscription and banishment, and the means of deleting entries in registers of the proscribed. It was also noted that deleted entries generally occur in the most recent sections of registers of the proscribed. Their absence usually signals the sections of records from more distant times that have lost their relevance and thus no longer needed to be edited on an on-going basis. Moreover, the article emphasises the need for research into such issues as the social composition of the proscribed who appeared in the Wismar register, as well as their victims, female criminality, cases of relapse into crime among the proscribed, and the subsequent fate of such ‘recidivists’, or the attitude of municipal authorities to crimes committed against the representatives of the broadly understood social mar-gin. When researching these issues, the comparative perspective should be broadened to include registers of the proscribed from late medieval towns in the Kingdom of Poland and the Teutonic Order state in Prussia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信