慢性肾脏病3期和4期患者主动脉僵硬与腹主动脉和冠状动脉钙化的关系

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Juan Carlos Hidalgo Santiago , Jary Perelló Martínez , Javier Vargas Romero , José Luis Pallares , Alfredo Michan Doña , Pablo Gómez-Fernández
{"title":"慢性肾脏病3期和4期患者主动脉僵硬与腹主动脉和冠状动脉钙化的关系","authors":"Juan Carlos Hidalgo Santiago ,&nbsp;Jary Perelló Martínez ,&nbsp;Javier Vargas Romero ,&nbsp;José Luis Pallares ,&nbsp;Alfredo Michan Doña ,&nbsp;Pablo Gómez-Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.nefro.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and objectives</h3><p>Increased central (aortic) arterial stiffness has hemodynamic repercussions that affect the incidence of cardiovascular and renal disease. In chronic kidney disease (CKD) there may be an increase in aortic stiffness secondary to multiple metabolic alterations including calcification of the vascular wall (VC).</p><p>The objective of this study was to analyze the association of central aortic pressures and aortic stiffness with the presence of VC in abdominal aorta (AAC) and coronary arteries (CAC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We included 87 patients with CKD stage 3 and 4. Using applanation tonometry, central aortic pressures and aortic stiffness were studied. We investigated the association of aortic pulse wave velocity (Pv<sub>c-f</sub>) and Pv<sub>c-f</sub> adjusted for age, blood pressure, sex and heart rate (Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index) with AAC obtained on lumbar lateral radiography and CAC assessed by multidetector computed tomography. AAC and CAC were scored according to Kauppila and Agatston methods, respectively. For the study of the association between iPv<sub>c-f</sub> index, Kauppila score, Agatston score, central aortic pressures, clinical parameters and laboratory data, multiple and logistic regression were used. We investigated the diagnosis performance of the Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index for prediction of VC using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pv<sub>c-f</sub> and Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index were 11.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.6<!--> <!-->m/s and 10.6<!--> <!-->m/s, respectively. The Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index was higher when CKD coexisted with diabetes mellitus (DM). AAC and CAC were detected in 77% and 87%, respectively.</p><p>Albuminuria (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.13, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.005) and Kauppila score (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.36, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001) were independently associated with Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index. In turn, Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.39, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001), DM (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.46, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.01), and smoking (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.53; <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.006) were associated with Kauppila score, but only Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index predicted AAC [OR: 3.33 (95% CI: 1.6–6.9; <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001)].</p><p>The Kauppila score was independently associated with the Agatston score (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->1.53, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001). The presence of AAC identified patients with CAC with a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 38%.</p><p>The Vp<sub>c-f</sub> index predicted the presence of CAC [OR: 3.35 (95% CI: 1.04–10.2, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.04)]. In the ROC curves, using the Vp<sub>c-f</sub> index, the AUC for AAC and CAC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71–0.93, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.67–0.96, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.02), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>When stage 3–4 CKD coexists with DM there is an increase in aortic stiffness determined by the Vp<sub>c-f</sub> index. In stage 3–4 CKD, AAC and CAC are very prevalent and both often coexist. The Vp<sub>c-f</sub> index is independently associated with AAC and CAC and may be useful in identifying patients with VC in these territories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18997,"journal":{"name":"Nefrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699523000942/pdfft?md5=8422146c50f5a11e6702ae664ff150ed&pid=1-s2.0-S0211699523000942-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asociación de la rigidez aórtica con calcificaciones vasculares abdominales y coronarias en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica estadios 3 y 4\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Hidalgo Santiago ,&nbsp;Jary Perelló Martínez ,&nbsp;Javier Vargas Romero ,&nbsp;José Luis Pallares ,&nbsp;Alfredo Michan Doña ,&nbsp;Pablo Gómez-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nefro.2023.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and objectives</h3><p>Increased central (aortic) arterial stiffness has hemodynamic repercussions that affect the incidence of cardiovascular and renal disease. In chronic kidney disease (CKD) there may be an increase in aortic stiffness secondary to multiple metabolic alterations including calcification of the vascular wall (VC).</p><p>The objective of this study was to analyze the association of central aortic pressures and aortic stiffness with the presence of VC in abdominal aorta (AAC) and coronary arteries (CAC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We included 87 patients with CKD stage 3 and 4. Using applanation tonometry, central aortic pressures and aortic stiffness were studied. We investigated the association of aortic pulse wave velocity (Pv<sub>c-f</sub>) and Pv<sub>c-f</sub> adjusted for age, blood pressure, sex and heart rate (Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index) with AAC obtained on lumbar lateral radiography and CAC assessed by multidetector computed tomography. AAC and CAC were scored according to Kauppila and Agatston methods, respectively. For the study of the association between iPv<sub>c-f</sub> index, Kauppila score, Agatston score, central aortic pressures, clinical parameters and laboratory data, multiple and logistic regression were used. We investigated the diagnosis performance of the Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index for prediction of VC using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pv<sub>c-f</sub> and Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index were 11.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.6<!--> <!-->m/s and 10.6<!--> <!-->m/s, respectively. The Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index was higher when CKD coexisted with diabetes mellitus (DM). AAC and CAC were detected in 77% and 87%, respectively.</p><p>Albuminuria (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.13, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.005) and Kauppila score (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.36, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001) were independently associated with Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index. In turn, Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.39, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001), DM (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.46, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.01), and smoking (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.53; <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.006) were associated with Kauppila score, but only Pv<sub>c-f</sub> index predicted AAC [OR: 3.33 (95% CI: 1.6–6.9; <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001)].</p><p>The Kauppila score was independently associated with the Agatston score (<em>β</em> <span>=</span> <!-->1.53, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001). The presence of AAC identified patients with CAC with a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 38%.</p><p>The Vp<sub>c-f</sub> index predicted the presence of CAC [OR: 3.35 (95% CI: 1.04–10.2, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.04)]. In the ROC curves, using the Vp<sub>c-f</sub> index, the AUC for AAC and CAC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71–0.93, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.001) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.67–0.96, <em>p</em> <span>=</span> <!-->0.02), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>When stage 3–4 CKD coexists with DM there is an increase in aortic stiffness determined by the Vp<sub>c-f</sub> index. In stage 3–4 CKD, AAC and CAC are very prevalent and both often coexist. The Vp<sub>c-f</sub> index is independently associated with AAC and CAC and may be useful in identifying patients with VC in these territories.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nefrologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699523000942/pdfft?md5=8422146c50f5a11e6702ae664ff150ed&pid=1-s2.0-S0211699523000942-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nefrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699523000942\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699523000942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由和目标中心(主动脉)动脉僵化的增加会对血液动力学产生影响,从而影响心血管疾病和肾脏疾病的发病率。本研究的目的是分析中心主动脉压力和主动脉僵硬度与腹主动脉(AAC)和冠状动脉(CAC)中是否存在 VC 的关系。使用眼压计对主动脉中心压和主动脉僵硬度进行了研究。我们研究了主动脉脉搏波速度(Pvc-f)和根据年龄、血压、性别和心率调整后的 Pvc-f(Pvc-f 指数)与腰椎侧位X光检查获得的 AAC 和多载体计算机断层扫描评估的 CAC 之间的关联。AAC和CAC分别按照Kauppila和Agatston方法进行评分。为了研究 iPvc-f 指数、Kauppila 评分、Agatston 评分、主动脉中心压、临床参数和实验室数据之间的关联,我们使用了多元回归和逻辑回归。结果 iPvc-f 和 Pvc-f 指数分别为 11.3 ± 2.6 m/s 和 10.6 m/s。当慢性肾脏病合并糖尿病(DM)时,Pvc-f指数更高。白蛋白尿(β = 0.13,P = 0.005)和 Kauppila 评分(β = 0.36,P = 0.001)与 Pvc-f 指数独立相关。反过来,Pvc-f 指数(β = 0.39,p = 0.001)、DM(β = 0.46,p = 0.01)和吸烟(β = 0.53;p = 0.006)与 Kauppila 评分相关,但只有 Pvc-f 指数可预测 AAC [OR: 3.Kauppila评分与Agatston评分独立相关(β = 1.53,p = 0.001)。AAC的灵敏度为73%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为38%.Vpc-f指数可预测CAC的存在[OR:3.35 (95% CI:1.04-10.2,p = 0.04)]。在使用 Vpc-f 指数的 ROC 曲线中,AAC 和 CAC 的 AUC 分别为 0.82(95% CI:0.71-0.93,p = 0.001)和 0.81(95% CI:0.67-0.96,p = 0.02)。在 3-4 期 CKD 中,AAC 和 CAC 非常普遍,而且两者经常同时存在。Vpc-f指数与AAC和CAC独立相关,可能有助于识别这些区域的主动脉瓣狭窄患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asociación de la rigidez aórtica con calcificaciones vasculares abdominales y coronarias en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica estadios 3 y 4

Rationale and objectives

Increased central (aortic) arterial stiffness has hemodynamic repercussions that affect the incidence of cardiovascular and renal disease. In chronic kidney disease (CKD) there may be an increase in aortic stiffness secondary to multiple metabolic alterations including calcification of the vascular wall (VC).

The objective of this study was to analyze the association of central aortic pressures and aortic stiffness with the presence of VC in abdominal aorta (AAC) and coronary arteries (CAC).

Materials and methods

We included 87 patients with CKD stage 3 and 4. Using applanation tonometry, central aortic pressures and aortic stiffness were studied. We investigated the association of aortic pulse wave velocity (Pvc-f) and Pvc-f adjusted for age, blood pressure, sex and heart rate (Pvc-f index) with AAC obtained on lumbar lateral radiography and CAC assessed by multidetector computed tomography. AAC and CAC were scored according to Kauppila and Agatston methods, respectively. For the study of the association between iPvc-f index, Kauppila score, Agatston score, central aortic pressures, clinical parameters and laboratory data, multiple and logistic regression were used. We investigated the diagnosis performance of the Pvc-f index for prediction of VC using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC).

Results

Pvc-f and Pvc-f index were 11.3 ± 2.6 m/s and 10.6 m/s, respectively. The Pvc-f index was higher when CKD coexisted with diabetes mellitus (DM). AAC and CAC were detected in 77% and 87%, respectively.

Albuminuria (β = 0.13, p = 0.005) and Kauppila score (β = 0.36, p = 0.001) were independently associated with Pvc-f index. In turn, Pvc-f index (β = 0.39, p = 0.001), DM (β = 0.46, p = 0.01), and smoking (β = 0.53; p = 0.006) were associated with Kauppila score, but only Pvc-f index predicted AAC [OR: 3.33 (95% CI: 1.6–6.9; p = 0.001)].

The Kauppila score was independently associated with the Agatston score (β = 1.53, p = 0.001). The presence of AAC identified patients with CAC with a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 38%.

The Vpc-f index predicted the presence of CAC [OR: 3.35 (95% CI: 1.04–10.2, p = 0.04)]. In the ROC curves, using the Vpc-f index, the AUC for AAC and CAC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71–0.93, p = 0.001) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.67–0.96, p = 0.02), respectively.

Conclusions

When stage 3–4 CKD coexists with DM there is an increase in aortic stiffness determined by the Vpc-f index. In stage 3–4 CKD, AAC and CAC are very prevalent and both often coexist. The Vpc-f index is independently associated with AAC and CAC and may be useful in identifying patients with VC in these territories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nefrologia
Nefrologia 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Nefrología is the official publication of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. The Journal publishes articles on basic or clinical research relating to nephrology, arterial hypertension, dialysis and kidney transplants. It is governed by the peer review system and all original papers are subject to internal assessment and external reviews. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信