已故捐赠者肾移植:北印度一家三级护理医院的单中心经验

IF 0.2 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION
S. Chadha, D. Choudhury, V. Goel, Anurag Gupta, V. Tiwari, V. Bhargava, M. Malik, Ashwani K Gupta, A. Bhalla, D. Rana
{"title":"已故捐赠者肾移植:北印度一家三级护理医院的单中心经验","authors":"S. Chadha, D. Choudhury, V. Goel, Anurag Gupta, V. Tiwari, V. Bhargava, M. Malik, Ashwani K Gupta, A. Bhalla, D. Rana","doi":"10.4103/ijot.ijot_53_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Deceased-donor renal transplants can help cope up with the increasing demand of renal allografts in India. We evaluated the outcomes of deceased-donor renal transplantation at our center. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the donor and recipient characteristics along with graft and patient survival in deceased-donor renal transplant recipients at our center between April 2011 and October 2021. Results: The mean age of recipients (n = 21) and deceased donors was 48 ± 9.4 and 39.3 ± 8.7 years, respectively. Male:female ratio among recipients was 1.6:1 while that in donors was 2:1. Chronic glomerulonephritis (71.4%) was the most common native kidney disease. Most patients received antithymocyte globulin (80.9%) as induction and tacrolimus-based triple-drug regimen (80.4%) as maintenance therapy. The median follow-up duration was 32.8 months. Graft dysfunction was reported in 57.1% (n = 12/21) patients; acute tubular necrosis was the most common reason (n = 5). Six patients died, and sepsis was the most common reason for death (n = 3/6; 50%); 66.7% (n = 4/6) deaths occurred within the first 6 months. The mean graft survival time was 106.2 months (95% confidence interval: 95.4–116.6). The cumulative proportion of graft survival was 95.2% (n = 20/21) at 3 and 5 years. The cumulative proportion of patient survival was 80.9% at 3 years and 76.2% at 5 years. Conclusion: Patient outcomes over 5 years follow-up were good and suggest that deceased-donor transplants should be encouraged along with living-donor transplants to cover the huge demand–supply mismatch in renal replacement therapy.","PeriodicalId":37455,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Transplantation","volume":"17 1","pages":"236 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deceased-Donor renal transplantation: A single-center experience from a tertiary care hospital in North India\",\"authors\":\"S. Chadha, D. Choudhury, V. Goel, Anurag Gupta, V. Tiwari, V. Bhargava, M. Malik, Ashwani K Gupta, A. Bhalla, D. Rana\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijot.ijot_53_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Deceased-donor renal transplants can help cope up with the increasing demand of renal allografts in India. We evaluated the outcomes of deceased-donor renal transplantation at our center. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the donor and recipient characteristics along with graft and patient survival in deceased-donor renal transplant recipients at our center between April 2011 and October 2021. Results: The mean age of recipients (n = 21) and deceased donors was 48 ± 9.4 and 39.3 ± 8.7 years, respectively. Male:female ratio among recipients was 1.6:1 while that in donors was 2:1. Chronic glomerulonephritis (71.4%) was the most common native kidney disease. Most patients received antithymocyte globulin (80.9%) as induction and tacrolimus-based triple-drug regimen (80.4%) as maintenance therapy. The median follow-up duration was 32.8 months. Graft dysfunction was reported in 57.1% (n = 12/21) patients; acute tubular necrosis was the most common reason (n = 5). Six patients died, and sepsis was the most common reason for death (n = 3/6; 50%); 66.7% (n = 4/6) deaths occurred within the first 6 months. The mean graft survival time was 106.2 months (95% confidence interval: 95.4–116.6). The cumulative proportion of graft survival was 95.2% (n = 20/21) at 3 and 5 years. The cumulative proportion of patient survival was 80.9% at 3 years and 76.2% at 5 years. Conclusion: Patient outcomes over 5 years follow-up were good and suggest that deceased-donor transplants should be encouraged along with living-donor transplants to cover the huge demand–supply mismatch in renal replacement therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"236 - 240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijot.ijot_53_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijot.ijot_53_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:死亡的供体肾移植可以帮助应对印度日益增长的同种异体肾移植需求。我们在我们的中心评估了已故供体肾移植的结果。方法:本回顾性研究分析了2011年4月至2021年10月期间我中心已故供肾移植受者的供肾和受肾特征以及移植物和患者生存率。结果:受体(n=21)和已故供体的平均年龄分别为48±9.4和39.3±8.7岁。接受者的男女比例为1.6:1,而捐赠者的男女比例则为2:1。慢性肾小球肾炎(71.4%)是最常见的本土肾脏疾病。大多数患者接受抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(80.9%)作为诱导,以他克莫司为基础的三药方案(80.4%)作为维持治疗。中位随访时间为32.8个月。57.1%(n=12/21)的患者报告了移植物功能障碍;急性肾小管坏死是最常见的原因(n=5)。6名患者死亡,败血症是最常见的死亡原因(n=3/6;50%);66.7%(n=4/6)的死亡发生在前6个月内。平均移植物存活时间为106.2个月(95%置信区间:95.4-116.6)。3年和5年时,移植物存活的累计比例为95.2%(n=20/21)。患者3年时的累计生存率为80.9%,5年时为76.2%。结论:5年以上的患者随访结果良好,建议鼓励已故供体移植和活体供体移植,以弥补肾脏替代治疗中巨大的供需不匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deceased-Donor renal transplantation: A single-center experience from a tertiary care hospital in North India
Introduction: Deceased-donor renal transplants can help cope up with the increasing demand of renal allografts in India. We evaluated the outcomes of deceased-donor renal transplantation at our center. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the donor and recipient characteristics along with graft and patient survival in deceased-donor renal transplant recipients at our center between April 2011 and October 2021. Results: The mean age of recipients (n = 21) and deceased donors was 48 ± 9.4 and 39.3 ± 8.7 years, respectively. Male:female ratio among recipients was 1.6:1 while that in donors was 2:1. Chronic glomerulonephritis (71.4%) was the most common native kidney disease. Most patients received antithymocyte globulin (80.9%) as induction and tacrolimus-based triple-drug regimen (80.4%) as maintenance therapy. The median follow-up duration was 32.8 months. Graft dysfunction was reported in 57.1% (n = 12/21) patients; acute tubular necrosis was the most common reason (n = 5). Six patients died, and sepsis was the most common reason for death (n = 3/6; 50%); 66.7% (n = 4/6) deaths occurred within the first 6 months. The mean graft survival time was 106.2 months (95% confidence interval: 95.4–116.6). The cumulative proportion of graft survival was 95.2% (n = 20/21) at 3 and 5 years. The cumulative proportion of patient survival was 80.9% at 3 years and 76.2% at 5 years. Conclusion: Patient outcomes over 5 years follow-up were good and suggest that deceased-donor transplants should be encouraged along with living-donor transplants to cover the huge demand–supply mismatch in renal replacement therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Transplantation
Indian Journal of Transplantation Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Transplantation, an official publication of Indian Society of Organ Transplantation (ISOT), is a peer-reviewed print + online quarterly national journal. The journal''s full text is available online at http://www.ijtonline.in. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. It has many articles which include original articIes, review articles, case reports etc and is very popular among the nephrologists, urologists and transplant surgeons alike. It has a very wide circulation among all the nephrologists, urologists, transplant surgeons and physicians iinvolved in kidney, heart, liver, lungs and pancreas transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信