20世纪巴西非正式治理的历史化

IF 2.1 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Brodwyn Fischer
{"title":"20世纪巴西非正式治理的历史化","authors":"Brodwyn Fischer","doi":"10.1080/21582041.2021.1919748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This is an article about what urban informality means when it is understood historically. In particular, it explores the relationship between urban informality and three vital threads in Brazil’s contemporary history: the evolution of racialized governance and inequality, the tense coexistence of private and public forms of power, and the complex contradictions embedded in Brazilian social struggles. Paying special attention to the way in which regulation creates informality from everyday life, I argue that Brazil’s modern urban law, from its very inception, has naturalised a version of urbanity that was both out-of-step with Brazil’s urban realities and economically unfeasible for many urban residents. By compounding poverty with the stigma of illegality, and especially by disproportionately channelling Afro-descendants into systems of urban power relations that denied them both citizenship and resources, Brazil’s urban legal and regulatory practices perpetuated racial inequality, undermined the legitimacy of liberal institutional governance, and channelled social activism in directions that, while often locally emancipatory, ultimately perpetuated Brazil’s deepest inequalities.","PeriodicalId":46484,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Social Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"205 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21582041.2021.1919748","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historicising informal governance in 20th century Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Brodwyn Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21582041.2021.1919748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This is an article about what urban informality means when it is understood historically. In particular, it explores the relationship between urban informality and three vital threads in Brazil’s contemporary history: the evolution of racialized governance and inequality, the tense coexistence of private and public forms of power, and the complex contradictions embedded in Brazilian social struggles. Paying special attention to the way in which regulation creates informality from everyday life, I argue that Brazil’s modern urban law, from its very inception, has naturalised a version of urbanity that was both out-of-step with Brazil’s urban realities and economically unfeasible for many urban residents. By compounding poverty with the stigma of illegality, and especially by disproportionately channelling Afro-descendants into systems of urban power relations that denied them both citizenship and resources, Brazil’s urban legal and regulatory practices perpetuated racial inequality, undermined the legitimacy of liberal institutional governance, and channelled social activism in directions that, while often locally emancipatory, ultimately perpetuated Brazil’s deepest inequalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Social Science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"205 - 221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21582041.2021.1919748\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2021.1919748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2021.1919748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这是一篇关于从历史上理解城市非正式性意味着什么的文章。特别是,它探讨了城市非正式性与巴西当代史上三个重要线索之间的关系:种族化治理和不平等的演变,私人和公共权力形式的紧张共存,以及巴西社会斗争中嵌入的复杂矛盾。我特别关注监管在日常生活中创造非正式性的方式,我认为,巴西的现代城市法从一开始就自然化了一种与巴西城市现实脱节、对许多城市居民来说在经济上不可行的城市化版本。通过将贫困与非法的耻辱相结合,特别是通过将非洲裔不成比例地引入城市权力关系体系,剥夺他们的公民身份和资源,巴西的城市法律和监管实践使种族不平等永久化,破坏了自由制度治理的合法性,并将社会行动主义引向了虽然往往具有地方解放意义的方向,但最终使巴西最深刻的不平等永久化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historicising informal governance in 20th century Brazil
ABSTRACT This is an article about what urban informality means when it is understood historically. In particular, it explores the relationship between urban informality and three vital threads in Brazil’s contemporary history: the evolution of racialized governance and inequality, the tense coexistence of private and public forms of power, and the complex contradictions embedded in Brazilian social struggles. Paying special attention to the way in which regulation creates informality from everyday life, I argue that Brazil’s modern urban law, from its very inception, has naturalised a version of urbanity that was both out-of-step with Brazil’s urban realities and economically unfeasible for many urban residents. By compounding poverty with the stigma of illegality, and especially by disproportionately channelling Afro-descendants into systems of urban power relations that denied them both citizenship and resources, Brazil’s urban legal and regulatory practices perpetuated racial inequality, undermined the legitimacy of liberal institutional governance, and channelled social activism in directions that, while often locally emancipatory, ultimately perpetuated Brazil’s deepest inequalities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Social Science
Contemporary Social Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信