代理投票争议:基金经理和代理顾问的角色

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Arnoud Boot, J. Krahnen, Lemma W. Senbet, Chester Spatt
{"title":"代理投票争议:基金经理和代理顾问的角色","authors":"Arnoud Boot, J. Krahnen, Lemma W. Senbet, Chester Spatt","doi":"10.1080/0015198X.2023.2240081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this statement, we assess the role and power of proxy advisors and asset managers in corporate governance in a market that is characterized by a limited number of voting advisory firms (Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis) and a growing dominance of index investing concentrated in a few large asset managers, such as BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. We discuss the business model of proxy advisory firms and contrast its objectives with those of asset managers in the context of the informational screening/filtering role and voting analysis and conclude with a set of policy recommendations addressing transparency and regulatory oversight.","PeriodicalId":48062,"journal":{"name":"Financial Analysts Journal","volume":"79 1","pages":"8 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Controversy over Proxy Voting: The Role of Fund Managers and Proxy Advisors\",\"authors\":\"Arnoud Boot, J. Krahnen, Lemma W. Senbet, Chester Spatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0015198X.2023.2240081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this statement, we assess the role and power of proxy advisors and asset managers in corporate governance in a market that is characterized by a limited number of voting advisory firms (Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis) and a growing dominance of index investing concentrated in a few large asset managers, such as BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. We discuss the business model of proxy advisory firms and contrast its objectives with those of asset managers in the context of the informational screening/filtering role and voting analysis and conclude with a set of policy recommendations addressing transparency and regulatory oversight.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Analysts Journal\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"8 - 15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Analysts Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2023.2240081\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2023.2240081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本声明中,我们评估了代理顾问和资产管理公司在公司治理中的作用和权力,其市场特征是有限数量的投票咨询公司(Institutional Shareholder Services和Glass Lewis),以及指数投资日益集中在少数大型资产管理公司(如贝莱德、先锋和道富)的主导地位。我们讨论了代理咨询公司的商业模式,并在信息筛选/过滤角色和投票分析的背景下,将其目标与资产管理公司的目标进行了对比,最后提出了一套解决透明度和监管监督问题的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Controversy over Proxy Voting: The Role of Fund Managers and Proxy Advisors
In this statement, we assess the role and power of proxy advisors and asset managers in corporate governance in a market that is characterized by a limited number of voting advisory firms (Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis) and a growing dominance of index investing concentrated in a few large asset managers, such as BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. We discuss the business model of proxy advisory firms and contrast its objectives with those of asset managers in the context of the informational screening/filtering role and voting analysis and conclude with a set of policy recommendations addressing transparency and regulatory oversight.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Analysts Journal
Financial Analysts Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Financial Analysts Journal aims to be the leading practitioner journal in the investment management community by advancing the knowledge and understanding of the practice of investment management through the publication of rigorous, peer-reviewed, practitioner-relevant research from leading academics and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信