为什么我们不应该衡量前工业化国家妇女劳动力的参与程度

IF 0.9 Q1 HISTORY
J. Burnette
{"title":"为什么我们不应该衡量前工业化国家妇女劳动力的参与程度","authors":"J. Burnette","doi":"10.1080/20780389.2021.1929602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Labour force participation was designed to measure contemporary labour markets, and does a poor job of measuring work, particularly women’s work, in the past. When we measure labour force participation we ignore production for household use, ignore differences in the intensity of work, and assume a continuity of employment that did not characterize most historical work. Therefore, I suggest that we should not use labour force participation to measure women’s work outside of modern, industrialized societies.","PeriodicalId":54115,"journal":{"name":"Economic History of Developing Regions","volume":"36 1","pages":"422 - 427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why we shouldn’t measure women’s labour force participation in pre-industrial countries\",\"authors\":\"J. Burnette\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20780389.2021.1929602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Labour force participation was designed to measure contemporary labour markets, and does a poor job of measuring work, particularly women’s work, in the past. When we measure labour force participation we ignore production for household use, ignore differences in the intensity of work, and assume a continuity of employment that did not characterize most historical work. Therefore, I suggest that we should not use labour force participation to measure women’s work outside of modern, industrialized societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic History of Developing Regions\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"422 - 427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic History of Developing Regions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2021.1929602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History of Developing Regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2021.1929602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

劳动力参与率是用来衡量当代劳动力市场的,但在过去,它在衡量工作,尤其是女性的工作方面做得很差。当我们衡量劳动力参与时,我们忽略了家庭使用的生产,忽略了工作强度的差异,并假设了就业的连续性,而这并不是大多数历史工作的特征。因此,我建议我们不应该用劳动力参与来衡量现代工业化社会以外的妇女的工作情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why we shouldn’t measure women’s labour force participation in pre-industrial countries
ABSTRACT Labour force participation was designed to measure contemporary labour markets, and does a poor job of measuring work, particularly women’s work, in the past. When we measure labour force participation we ignore production for household use, ignore differences in the intensity of work, and assume a continuity of employment that did not characterize most historical work. Therefore, I suggest that we should not use labour force participation to measure women’s work outside of modern, industrialized societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信