从理论到理论,再回来,再超越:非洲宗教的非殖民化研究

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
Oludamini Ogunnaike
{"title":"从理论到理论,再回来,再超越:非洲宗教的非殖民化研究","authors":"Oludamini Ogunnaike","doi":"10.5325/jafrireli.10.2.0174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Many scholars have pointed out that African religious traditions are typically treated as \"data\" to be interpreted by academic theories, and not as interpretive theories in their own right, leading to calls for the development of \"decolonial\" or \"indigenous theory\" to redress this dynamic. Yet, with certain glowing exceptions, these efforts to \"decolonize theory\" typically attempt to employ the same Euro-American theories and paradigms to critique themselves and \"translate\" the theories of African religious traditions into the terms of these academic theories. Taking the traditions of Sufism and Ifá as case studies, I would like to argue that while both have sophisticated hermeneutics, theories, and doctrines, both traditions are something other than academic theories. Using analogies of language and language acquisition, this article explores how best to represent, translate, and teach the former (Sufism and Ifá) in the context of the latter (undergraduate and graduate education in \"Western\" academia).","PeriodicalId":41877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Africana Religions","volume":"10 1","pages":"174 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Theory to Theoria and Back Again and Beyond: Decolonizing the Study of Africana Religions\",\"authors\":\"Oludamini Ogunnaike\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jafrireli.10.2.0174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Many scholars have pointed out that African religious traditions are typically treated as \\\"data\\\" to be interpreted by academic theories, and not as interpretive theories in their own right, leading to calls for the development of \\\"decolonial\\\" or \\\"indigenous theory\\\" to redress this dynamic. Yet, with certain glowing exceptions, these efforts to \\\"decolonize theory\\\" typically attempt to employ the same Euro-American theories and paradigms to critique themselves and \\\"translate\\\" the theories of African religious traditions into the terms of these academic theories. Taking the traditions of Sufism and Ifá as case studies, I would like to argue that while both have sophisticated hermeneutics, theories, and doctrines, both traditions are something other than academic theories. Using analogies of language and language acquisition, this article explores how best to represent, translate, and teach the former (Sufism and Ifá) in the context of the latter (undergraduate and graduate education in \\\"Western\\\" academia).\",\"PeriodicalId\":41877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Africana Religions\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"174 - 211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Africana Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jafrireli.10.2.0174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Africana Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jafrireli.10.2.0174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:许多学者指出,非洲宗教传统通常被视为由学术理论解释的“数据”,而不是其本身的解释性理论,这导致人们呼吁发展“非殖民化”或“土著理论”来纠正这种动态。然而,除了某些耀眼的例外,这些“去殖民化理论”的努力通常试图采用同样的欧美理论和范式来批评自己,并将非洲宗教传统的理论“翻译”成这些学术理论的术语。以苏菲派和伊法的传统为例,我想说,虽然两者都有复杂的解释学、理论和教义,但这两种传统都不是学术理论。本文利用语言和语言习得的类比,探讨了如何在后者(“西方”学术界的本科和研究生教育)的背景下最好地表达、翻译和教授前者(苏非主义和伊法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Theory to Theoria and Back Again and Beyond: Decolonizing the Study of Africana Religions
Abstract:Many scholars have pointed out that African religious traditions are typically treated as "data" to be interpreted by academic theories, and not as interpretive theories in their own right, leading to calls for the development of "decolonial" or "indigenous theory" to redress this dynamic. Yet, with certain glowing exceptions, these efforts to "decolonize theory" typically attempt to employ the same Euro-American theories and paradigms to critique themselves and "translate" the theories of African religious traditions into the terms of these academic theories. Taking the traditions of Sufism and Ifá as case studies, I would like to argue that while both have sophisticated hermeneutics, theories, and doctrines, both traditions are something other than academic theories. Using analogies of language and language acquisition, this article explores how best to represent, translate, and teach the former (Sufism and Ifá) in the context of the latter (undergraduate and graduate education in "Western" academia).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Africana Religions publishes critical scholarship on Africana religions, including the religious traditions of African and African Diasporic peoples as well as religious traditions influenced by the diverse cultural heritage of Africa. An interdisciplinary journal encompassing history, anthropology, Africana studies, gender studies, ethnic studies, religious studies, and other allied disciplines, the Journal of Africana Religions embraces a variety of humanistic and social scientific methodologies in understanding the social, political, and cultural meanings and functions of Africana religions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信