{"title":"走向可持续的美国医疗保健系统:市场公正和社会公正的政策含义","authors":"Henry Eliassen","doi":"10.35782/jcpp.2021.3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic and current projections of rising health expenditures point to an impending sustainability crisis in US health care institutions, torn between competing demands of individualistic values (marketjustice) and collective values (socialjustice). Champions of individual responsibility are likely to favor a disease management model of health care –wherein the maintenance of lucrative food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries depends in large part on the creation and reproduction of an older but sicker consumer base, with survival to old age contingent on individuals’capacity to pay for tests, treatments, and prescriptions. In contrast, proponents of community solidarity favor a health promotion model emphasizing primordial prevention — focused upstream on improvements in nutrition and in living and working conditions potentially capable of forestalling the onset of disease in the first place. In the end, health system sustainability will hinge on policy makers’ readiness to recognize, and innovate in response to, deeply ingrained values of both individual responsibility and community solidarity. To foster long-term stability in health care, effective policy must strive toward meeting the following essential needs: (1) optimal population health, (2) consumer and provider satisfaction, (3) fiscally stable and affordable funding sources, and (4) replacement opportunities for jobs lost to restructuring. © 2021. All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":36161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Positive Practices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TOWARD A SUSTAINABLE US HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF MARKET JUSTICE AND SOCIAL JUSTICE\",\"authors\":\"Henry Eliassen\",\"doi\":\"10.35782/jcpp.2021.3.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic and current projections of rising health expenditures point to an impending sustainability crisis in US health care institutions, torn between competing demands of individualistic values (marketjustice) and collective values (socialjustice). Champions of individual responsibility are likely to favor a disease management model of health care –wherein the maintenance of lucrative food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries depends in large part on the creation and reproduction of an older but sicker consumer base, with survival to old age contingent on individuals’capacity to pay for tests, treatments, and prescriptions. In contrast, proponents of community solidarity favor a health promotion model emphasizing primordial prevention — focused upstream on improvements in nutrition and in living and working conditions potentially capable of forestalling the onset of disease in the first place. In the end, health system sustainability will hinge on policy makers’ readiness to recognize, and innovate in response to, deeply ingrained values of both individual responsibility and community solidarity. To foster long-term stability in health care, effective policy must strive toward meeting the following essential needs: (1) optimal population health, (2) consumer and provider satisfaction, (3) fiscally stable and affordable funding sources, and (4) replacement opportunities for jobs lost to restructuring. © 2021. All Rights Reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Positive Practices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Positive Practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35782/jcpp.2021.3.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Positive Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35782/jcpp.2021.3.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TOWARD A SUSTAINABLE US HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF MARKET JUSTICE AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
The COVID-19 pandemic and current projections of rising health expenditures point to an impending sustainability crisis in US health care institutions, torn between competing demands of individualistic values (marketjustice) and collective values (socialjustice). Champions of individual responsibility are likely to favor a disease management model of health care –wherein the maintenance of lucrative food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries depends in large part on the creation and reproduction of an older but sicker consumer base, with survival to old age contingent on individuals’capacity to pay for tests, treatments, and prescriptions. In contrast, proponents of community solidarity favor a health promotion model emphasizing primordial prevention — focused upstream on improvements in nutrition and in living and working conditions potentially capable of forestalling the onset of disease in the first place. In the end, health system sustainability will hinge on policy makers’ readiness to recognize, and innovate in response to, deeply ingrained values of both individual responsibility and community solidarity. To foster long-term stability in health care, effective policy must strive toward meeting the following essential needs: (1) optimal population health, (2) consumer and provider satisfaction, (3) fiscally stable and affordable funding sources, and (4) replacement opportunities for jobs lost to restructuring. © 2021. All Rights Reserved.