重新定义21世纪音乐学生的试镜

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Daniel J. Albert, A. Heiderscheit
{"title":"重新定义21世纪音乐学生的试镜","authors":"Daniel J. Albert, A. Heiderscheit","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this quality improvement project was to examine a newly-implemented music admissions assessment process at a small liberal arts university and students’ perceptions of that process, which was intended to provide a holistic view of prospective students’ pre-admission achievement and to offer feedback regarding their readiness and potential success for meeting degree requirements. Faculty designed a three-part assessment process, integrating an inclusive perspective to provide them with a more complete view of a student’s skills, strengths, and areas in need of development prior to initiating their music studies. This process was designed to place students at the center of the assessment process and ensure that they have the opportunity to demonstrate their broad scope of skills. Music, human development and learning (i.e., music education) and music therapy students were invited to be interviewed regarding their experiences of the revised assessment process. Nine students participated in a focus group and were interviewed individually. Data analysis revealed four themes: Connecting with Others; Professional Identity; Developing as a Musician; Seen as an Individual. This redesigned process provided students with opportunities to create connections with their peers and faculty, serving as a means of support and belonging in the social and academic environment. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761 .","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"124 1","pages":"135 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing the audition for the 21st century music student\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J. Albert, A. Heiderscheit\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The purpose of this quality improvement project was to examine a newly-implemented music admissions assessment process at a small liberal arts university and students’ perceptions of that process, which was intended to provide a holistic view of prospective students’ pre-admission achievement and to offer feedback regarding their readiness and potential success for meeting degree requirements. Faculty designed a three-part assessment process, integrating an inclusive perspective to provide them with a more complete view of a student’s skills, strengths, and areas in need of development prior to initiating their music studies. This process was designed to place students at the center of the assessment process and ensure that they have the opportunity to demonstrate their broad scope of skills. Music, human development and learning (i.e., music education) and music therapy students were invited to be interviewed regarding their experiences of the revised assessment process. Nine students participated in a focus group and were interviewed individually. Data analysis revealed four themes: Connecting with Others; Professional Identity; Developing as a Musician; Seen as an Individual. This redesigned process provided students with opportunities to create connections with their peers and faculty, serving as a means of support and belonging in the social and academic environment. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":37632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"135 - 148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts Education Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本质量改进项目的目的是研究一所小型文科大学新实施的音乐招生评估过程,以及学生对该过程的看法,其目的是全面了解未来学生的入学前成绩,并就他们满足学位要求的准备情况和潜在成功提供反馈。学院设计了一个由三部分组成的评估过程,整合了一个包容性的视角,让他们在开始音乐学习之前,更全面地了解学生的技能、优势和需要发展的领域。这一过程旨在将学生置于评估过程的中心,并确保他们有机会展示自己广泛的技能。音乐、人类发展和学习(即音乐教育)以及音乐治疗专业的学生被邀请就他们在修订后的评估过程中的经历接受采访。九名学生参加了一个焦点小组,并接受了单独采访。数据分析揭示了四个主题:与他人建立联系;职业身份;发展成为一名音乐家;视为一个个体。这一重新设计的过程为学生提供了与同龄人和教师建立联系的机会,作为在社会和学术环境中支持和归属的一种手段。本文的补充数据可在线获取,网址为https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconceptualizing the audition for the 21st century music student
Abstract The purpose of this quality improvement project was to examine a newly-implemented music admissions assessment process at a small liberal arts university and students’ perceptions of that process, which was intended to provide a holistic view of prospective students’ pre-admission achievement and to offer feedback regarding their readiness and potential success for meeting degree requirements. Faculty designed a three-part assessment process, integrating an inclusive perspective to provide them with a more complete view of a student’s skills, strengths, and areas in need of development prior to initiating their music studies. This process was designed to place students at the center of the assessment process and ensure that they have the opportunity to demonstrate their broad scope of skills. Music, human development and learning (i.e., music education) and music therapy students were invited to be interviewed regarding their experiences of the revised assessment process. Nine students participated in a focus group and were interviewed individually. Data analysis revealed four themes: Connecting with Others; Professional Identity; Developing as a Musician; Seen as an Individual. This redesigned process provided students with opportunities to create connections with their peers and faculty, serving as a means of support and belonging in the social and academic environment. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arts Education Policy Review
Arts Education Policy Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信