Dean L.Mamas对“没有量子纠缠的经典光学解释的贝尔测试”的评论[Phys.Essents 34，340（2021）]

IF 0.5 Q4 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Physics Essays Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.4006/0836-1398-36.1.87

Richard D. Gill

{"title":"Dean L.Mamas对“没有量子纠缠的经典光学解释的贝尔测试”的评论[Phys.Essents 34，340（2021）]","authors":"Richard D. Gill","doi":"10.4006/0836-1398-36.1.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a paper published in the journal [Phys. Essays 34, 340 (2021)], Mamas writes “A polarized photon interacts with a polarizer through the component of the photon's electric field which is aligned with the polarizer. This component varies as the cosine of the angle through\n which the polarizer is rotated, explaining the cosine observed in Bell test data. Quantum mechanics is unnecessary and plays no role”. Mamas is right that according to this physical model, one will observe a negative cosine. However, the amplitude of the cosine curve is 50%, not 100%,\n and it consequently does not violate any Bell-CHSH inequality. Mamas' physical model is a classic local hidden variables model. The result is illustrated with a Monte Carlo simulation.","PeriodicalId":51274,"journal":{"name":"Physics Essays","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on “Bell tests explained by classical optics without quantum entanglement” by Dean L. Mamas [Phys. Essays 34, 340 (2021)]\",\"authors\":\"Richard D. Gill\",\"doi\":\"10.4006/0836-1398-36.1.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a paper published in the journal [Phys. Essays 34, 340 (2021)], Mamas writes “A polarized photon interacts with a polarizer through the component of the photon's electric field which is aligned with the polarizer. This component varies as the cosine of the angle through\\n which the polarizer is rotated, explaining the cosine observed in Bell test data. Quantum mechanics is unnecessary and plays no role”. Mamas is right that according to this physical model, one will observe a negative cosine. However, the amplitude of the cosine curve is 50%, not 100%,\\n and it consequently does not violate any Bell-CHSH inequality. Mamas' physical model is a classic local hidden variables model. The result is illustrated with a Monte Carlo simulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics Essays\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics Essays\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-36.1.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics Essays","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-36.1.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在发表在《物理学》杂志上的一篇论文中。论文34,340 (2021)]，Mamas写道:“偏振光子通过与偏振器对齐的光子电场分量与偏振器相互作用。该分量随偏振片旋转角度的余弦值而变化，解释了贝尔测试数据中观察到的余弦值。量子力学是多余的，没有任何作用”。Mamas是对的，根据这个物理模型，我们会观察到一个负余弦。然而，余弦曲线的振幅是50%，而不是100%，因此它不违反任何Bell-CHSH不等式。Mamas的物理模型是一个经典的局部隐变量模型。结果用蒙特卡罗模拟进行了说明。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comment on “Bell tests explained by classical optics without quantum entanglement” by Dean L. Mamas [Phys. Essays 34, 340 (2021)]

In a paper published in the journal [Phys. Essays 34, 340 (2021)], Mamas writes “A polarized photon interacts with a polarizer through the component of the photon's electric field which is aligned with the polarizer. This component varies as the cosine of the angle through which the polarizer is rotated, explaining the cosine observed in Bell test data. Quantum mechanics is unnecessary and plays no role”. Mamas is right that according to this physical model, one will observe a negative cosine. However, the amplitude of the cosine curve is 50%, not 100%, and it consequently does not violate any Bell-CHSH inequality. Mamas' physical model is a classic local hidden variables model. The result is illustrated with a Monte Carlo simulation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Physics Essays PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

自引率

83.30%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Physics Essays has been established as an international journal dedicated to theoretical and experimental aspects of fundamental problems in Physics and, generally, to the advancement of basic knowledge of Physics. The Journal’s mandate is to publish rigorous and methodological examinations of past, current, and advanced concepts, methods and results in physics research. Physics Essays dedicates itself to the publication of stimulating exploratory, and original papers in a variety of physics disciplines, such as spectroscopy, quantum mechanics, particle physics, electromagnetic theory, astrophysics, space physics, mathematical methods in physics, plasma physics, philosophical aspects of physics, chemical physics, and relativity.