当事物变得贫瘠:马克思对资本主义的分析与海德格尔对技术的关注

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Diego Martínez-Zarazúa
{"title":"当事物变得贫瘠:马克思对资本主义的分析与海德格尔对技术的关注","authors":"Diego Martínez-Zarazúa","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2026750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To construct a dialogue between Marx and Heidegger, this essay reads the first volume of Capital together with Heidegger’s writings on technology, contending there is a common concern over the impoverishment of things and, more precisely, of their qualitative consistency that occurs under the sway of capitalism/modern technology. Regarding Marx, the essay argues for reading Capital in an ontological key, thereby placing it in the same philosophical register as Heidegger, and for conceiving it as a description of the impoverishment of beings, the reduction of their being to value. The essay then takes Heidegger’s writings on technology as corresponding to Capital, arguing that modern technology also leads to the same ontological Dürftigkeit. Finally, the essay succinctly sketches what Heidegger’s poietic way out of this situation might be, which in essence coincides with Marx’s position.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Things Impoverish: An Approach to Marx’s Analysis of Capitalism in Conjunction with Heidegger’s Concern over Technology\",\"authors\":\"Diego Martínez-Zarazúa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2022.2026750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To construct a dialogue between Marx and Heidegger, this essay reads the first volume of Capital together with Heidegger’s writings on technology, contending there is a common concern over the impoverishment of things and, more precisely, of their qualitative consistency that occurs under the sway of capitalism/modern technology. Regarding Marx, the essay argues for reading Capital in an ontological key, thereby placing it in the same philosophical register as Heidegger, and for conceiving it as a description of the impoverishment of beings, the reduction of their being to value. The essay then takes Heidegger’s writings on technology as corresponding to Capital, arguing that modern technology also leads to the same ontological Dürftigkeit. Finally, the essay succinctly sketches what Heidegger’s poietic way out of this situation might be, which in essence coincides with Marx’s position.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2026750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了构建马克思和海德格尔之间的对话,本文阅读了《资本论》第一卷以及海德格尔关于技术的著作,认为人们普遍关注事物的贫困,更确切地说,关注在资本主义/现代技术的影响下发生的质的一致性。关于马克思,本文主张将《资本论》作为本体论的钥匙来解读,从而将其置于与海德格尔相同的哲学范畴中,并将其视为对存在的贫困、存在的价值降低的描述。本文将海德格尔关于技术的著作视为与《资本论》相对应的著作,认为现代技术也导致了同样的本体论Dürftigkeit。最后,本文简明扼要地勾勒出海德格尔走出这一困境的具体途径,这在本质上与马克思的立场是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Things Impoverish: An Approach to Marx’s Analysis of Capitalism in Conjunction with Heidegger’s Concern over Technology
To construct a dialogue between Marx and Heidegger, this essay reads the first volume of Capital together with Heidegger’s writings on technology, contending there is a common concern over the impoverishment of things and, more precisely, of their qualitative consistency that occurs under the sway of capitalism/modern technology. Regarding Marx, the essay argues for reading Capital in an ontological key, thereby placing it in the same philosophical register as Heidegger, and for conceiving it as a description of the impoverishment of beings, the reduction of their being to value. The essay then takes Heidegger’s writings on technology as corresponding to Capital, arguing that modern technology also leads to the same ontological Dürftigkeit. Finally, the essay succinctly sketches what Heidegger’s poietic way out of this situation might be, which in essence coincides with Marx’s position.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信