拉合尔电影:介于现实主义和寓言之间

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Thomas Cowan
{"title":"拉合尔电影:介于现实主义和寓言之间","authors":"Thomas Cowan","doi":"10.1080/00856401.2023.2208444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even before Lahore Cinema: Between Realism and Fable, the study of the cinema in Pakistan owed much to the work of Iftikhar Dadi. Cinephiles, budding researchers and students of this once long-neglected field could look to Iftikhar and Elizabeth Dadi’s Urdu Film Series (1994/ 2009). Made up of photographs of television screens broadcasting Urdu-language Pakistani films, the series depicted the mutual exchanges between cultural memory and electronic media. One could also look to Iftikhar Dadi’s work as a curator and writer on contemporary art in his 2012 edited volume, Lines of Control: Partition as a Productive Space (with Hammad Nasar), or his influential role in the Lahore Biennale, and the artistic productions and collaborations this work documented and inspired. Then, one could turn to his writing on Pakistani film which, until the present book, appeared in important volumes on contemporary Pakistan or pioneering journals on screen studies in South Asia. As his first book-length foray into the subject, Dadi’s focus is Urdu-language films made in Pakistan between 1956 and 1969, a time he calls the ‘long sixties’. This roughly correlated with the rule of Ayub Khan, whose military rule ushered in a period of both industrial and infrastructural stability and political and social upheaval. In an earlier study of Pakistani films from a similar era, Dadi warned against mapping the relations between cinema and society, a relationship he called neither ‘mimetic nor reflective’. Wisely eschewing this foundational assumption that animates many global film histories, Lahore Cinema ends up being a very idiosyncratic text, an exercise in multi-scale comparison that looks not to linear trajectories of production and reception but to repertoires that emerge from, return to, or cling to the city of Lahore. There is an implicit qualitative difference that Dadi appears to be making between so-called Lollywood cinema, as both a space of industrial production","PeriodicalId":46457,"journal":{"name":"South Asia-Journal of South Asian Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":"718 - 720"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lahore Cinema: Between Realism and Fable\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Cowan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00856401.2023.2208444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even before Lahore Cinema: Between Realism and Fable, the study of the cinema in Pakistan owed much to the work of Iftikhar Dadi. Cinephiles, budding researchers and students of this once long-neglected field could look to Iftikhar and Elizabeth Dadi’s Urdu Film Series (1994/ 2009). Made up of photographs of television screens broadcasting Urdu-language Pakistani films, the series depicted the mutual exchanges between cultural memory and electronic media. One could also look to Iftikhar Dadi’s work as a curator and writer on contemporary art in his 2012 edited volume, Lines of Control: Partition as a Productive Space (with Hammad Nasar), or his influential role in the Lahore Biennale, and the artistic productions and collaborations this work documented and inspired. Then, one could turn to his writing on Pakistani film which, until the present book, appeared in important volumes on contemporary Pakistan or pioneering journals on screen studies in South Asia. As his first book-length foray into the subject, Dadi’s focus is Urdu-language films made in Pakistan between 1956 and 1969, a time he calls the ‘long sixties’. This roughly correlated with the rule of Ayub Khan, whose military rule ushered in a period of both industrial and infrastructural stability and political and social upheaval. In an earlier study of Pakistani films from a similar era, Dadi warned against mapping the relations between cinema and society, a relationship he called neither ‘mimetic nor reflective’. Wisely eschewing this foundational assumption that animates many global film histories, Lahore Cinema ends up being a very idiosyncratic text, an exercise in multi-scale comparison that looks not to linear trajectories of production and reception but to repertoires that emerge from, return to, or cling to the city of Lahore. There is an implicit qualitative difference that Dadi appears to be making between so-called Lollywood cinema, as both a space of industrial production\",\"PeriodicalId\":46457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asia-Journal of South Asian Studies\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"718 - 720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asia-Journal of South Asian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2023.2208444\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asia-Journal of South Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2023.2208444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甚至在《拉合尔电影:在现实主义和寓言之间》之前,对巴基斯坦电影的研究在很大程度上要归功于伊夫蒂哈尔·达迪的工作。电影爱好者,这个曾经长期被忽视的领域的新兴研究人员和学生可以看看伊夫蒂哈尔和伊丽莎白·达迪的乌尔都语电影系列(1994/ 2009)。该系列由播放乌尔都语巴基斯坦电影的电视屏幕的照片组成,描绘了文化记忆与电子媒体之间的相互交流。我们也可以看看伊夫蒂哈尔·达迪作为策展人和当代艺术作家的作品,他在2012年编辑的《控制线:作为生产空间的分区》(与哈马德·纳萨尔合作),或者他在拉合尔双年展中的重要作用,以及他的作品记录和启发的艺术作品和合作。然后,人们可以转向他关于巴基斯坦电影的著作,直到这本书,这些著作出现在当代巴基斯坦的重要卷或南亚银幕研究的先驱期刊上。作为他对这个主题的第一次著作,Dadi的重点是1956年至1969年在巴基斯坦拍摄的乌尔都语电影,他称之为“漫长的六十年代”。这与阿尤布汗的统治大致相关,他的军事统治带来了工业和基础设施稳定以及政治和社会动荡的时期。在对类似时代的巴基斯坦电影的早期研究中,Dadi警告不要绘制电影与社会之间的关系,他称这种关系既不是“模仿也不是反思”。明智地避开了这个推动了许多全球电影史的基本假设,《拉合尔电影》最终成为了一个非常特殊的文本,一个多尺度比较的练习,它不关注制作和接受的线性轨迹,而是关注从拉合尔市出现、回归或坚持的曲目。大地似乎在所谓的洛莱坞电影之间制造了一种隐含的质的区别,两者都是工业生产的空间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lahore Cinema: Between Realism and Fable
Even before Lahore Cinema: Between Realism and Fable, the study of the cinema in Pakistan owed much to the work of Iftikhar Dadi. Cinephiles, budding researchers and students of this once long-neglected field could look to Iftikhar and Elizabeth Dadi’s Urdu Film Series (1994/ 2009). Made up of photographs of television screens broadcasting Urdu-language Pakistani films, the series depicted the mutual exchanges between cultural memory and electronic media. One could also look to Iftikhar Dadi’s work as a curator and writer on contemporary art in his 2012 edited volume, Lines of Control: Partition as a Productive Space (with Hammad Nasar), or his influential role in the Lahore Biennale, and the artistic productions and collaborations this work documented and inspired. Then, one could turn to his writing on Pakistani film which, until the present book, appeared in important volumes on contemporary Pakistan or pioneering journals on screen studies in South Asia. As his first book-length foray into the subject, Dadi’s focus is Urdu-language films made in Pakistan between 1956 and 1969, a time he calls the ‘long sixties’. This roughly correlated with the rule of Ayub Khan, whose military rule ushered in a period of both industrial and infrastructural stability and political and social upheaval. In an earlier study of Pakistani films from a similar era, Dadi warned against mapping the relations between cinema and society, a relationship he called neither ‘mimetic nor reflective’. Wisely eschewing this foundational assumption that animates many global film histories, Lahore Cinema ends up being a very idiosyncratic text, an exercise in multi-scale comparison that looks not to linear trajectories of production and reception but to repertoires that emerge from, return to, or cling to the city of Lahore. There is an implicit qualitative difference that Dadi appears to be making between so-called Lollywood cinema, as both a space of industrial production
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信