2012-2018年在伊斯法罕市医院接受手术治疗的直肠癌患者中低位前切除术综合征的患病率

Q4 Medicine
B. Sanei, Mohammad Ghasemi Fard, M. Kolahduzan
{"title":"2012-2018年在伊斯法罕市医院接受手术治疗的直肠癌患者中低位前切除术综合征的患病率","authors":"B. Sanei, Mohammad Ghasemi Fard, M. Kolahduzan","doi":"10.5937/MCKG54-24636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. We aimed to determine the relative frequency of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with rectal cancers who underwent surgical treatment in Isfahan. Methods. We evaluated all patients who were referred to the surgery clinic of Saint Al-Zahra hospital in Isfahan within six years. If LARS was identified, according to the LARS score tool, the frequency of resection complications, factors affecting the LARS, morbidity, and mortality, the frequency distribution of defecation, stool consistency, and rate of significant improvement was evaluated. Results. Fifty-two patients were evaluated. The prevalence of LARS was 78.8%. Postoperative fecal and gas incontinence, clustering, fecal frequency, and fecal urgency in LARS patients were significantly higher than in patients without LARS (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of factors affecting the LARS (p<0.05). In most of the patients with LARS, the defecation frequency was more than seven times a week (82.1%), and they mostly had liquid stool (61.5%). 95.5% of the patients with LARS showed significant improvement, which was mostly after 7-11 months (38.5). There was a significant difference between the frequency distribution of defecation, stool consistency, and significant improvement status in patients with and without LARS. Conclusion. LARS occurs commonly among patients undergoing LAR with TME and it is associated with more resection complications. Patients with LARS have significantly higher frequency of defecation per week and liquid stools and mostly achieve significant improvements. Other factors might not be significantly different between patients with or without LARS.","PeriodicalId":39117,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski Casopis","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment in Isfahan City Hospital during 2012-2018\",\"authors\":\"B. Sanei, Mohammad Ghasemi Fard, M. Kolahduzan\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/MCKG54-24636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. We aimed to determine the relative frequency of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with rectal cancers who underwent surgical treatment in Isfahan. Methods. We evaluated all patients who were referred to the surgery clinic of Saint Al-Zahra hospital in Isfahan within six years. If LARS was identified, according to the LARS score tool, the frequency of resection complications, factors affecting the LARS, morbidity, and mortality, the frequency distribution of defecation, stool consistency, and rate of significant improvement was evaluated. Results. Fifty-two patients were evaluated. The prevalence of LARS was 78.8%. Postoperative fecal and gas incontinence, clustering, fecal frequency, and fecal urgency in LARS patients were significantly higher than in patients without LARS (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of factors affecting the LARS (p<0.05). In most of the patients with LARS, the defecation frequency was more than seven times a week (82.1%), and they mostly had liquid stool (61.5%). 95.5% of the patients with LARS showed significant improvement, which was mostly after 7-11 months (38.5). There was a significant difference between the frequency distribution of defecation, stool consistency, and significant improvement status in patients with and without LARS. Conclusion. LARS occurs commonly among patients undergoing LAR with TME and it is associated with more resection complications. Patients with LARS have significantly higher frequency of defecation per week and liquid stools and mostly achieve significant improvements. Other factors might not be significantly different between patients with or without LARS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicinski Casopis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicinski Casopis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/MCKG54-24636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski Casopis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/MCKG54-24636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。我们的目的是确定在伊斯法罕接受手术治疗的直肠癌患者低前切除术综合征(LARS)的相对频率。方法。我们对六年内转诊到伊斯法罕圣扎赫拉医院外科诊所的所有患者进行了评估。如果确定了LARS,根据LARS评分工具,评估切除并发症的频率、影响LARS的因素、发病率和死亡率、排便频率分布、大便一致性和显著改善率。结果。对52例患者进行了评估。LARS患病率为78.8%。LARS患者术后大便和气体失禁、聚类、大便频率和大便急迫性均显著高于无LARS患者(P<0.05)。两组间影响LARS的因素比较差异无统计学意义(p<0.05)。大多数LARS患者排便次数≥7次/周(82.1%),多为液体便(61.5%)。95.5%的LARS患者有明显改善,主要发生在7-11个月(38.5%)。LARS患者与非LARS患者的排便频率分布、大便一致性及明显改善情况存在显著差异。结论。LARS常见于接受LAR合并TME的患者,并且与更多的切除术并发症相关。LARS患者每周排便频率和液体便明显增高,多数患者均有显著改善。其他因素在有或没有LARS的患者之间可能没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The prevalence of low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment in Isfahan City Hospital during 2012-2018
Objective. We aimed to determine the relative frequency of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with rectal cancers who underwent surgical treatment in Isfahan. Methods. We evaluated all patients who were referred to the surgery clinic of Saint Al-Zahra hospital in Isfahan within six years. If LARS was identified, according to the LARS score tool, the frequency of resection complications, factors affecting the LARS, morbidity, and mortality, the frequency distribution of defecation, stool consistency, and rate of significant improvement was evaluated. Results. Fifty-two patients were evaluated. The prevalence of LARS was 78.8%. Postoperative fecal and gas incontinence, clustering, fecal frequency, and fecal urgency in LARS patients were significantly higher than in patients without LARS (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of factors affecting the LARS (p<0.05). In most of the patients with LARS, the defecation frequency was more than seven times a week (82.1%), and they mostly had liquid stool (61.5%). 95.5% of the patients with LARS showed significant improvement, which was mostly after 7-11 months (38.5). There was a significant difference between the frequency distribution of defecation, stool consistency, and significant improvement status in patients with and without LARS. Conclusion. LARS occurs commonly among patients undergoing LAR with TME and it is associated with more resection complications. Patients with LARS have significantly higher frequency of defecation per week and liquid stools and mostly achieve significant improvements. Other factors might not be significantly different between patients with or without LARS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicinski Casopis
Medicinski Casopis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信