本土主义与文化挪用的限度

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
C. Sutherland
{"title":"本土主义与文化挪用的限度","authors":"C. Sutherland","doi":"10.1080/0969725X.2022.2093949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article turns a critical eye on the indigenista movement that flourished in Latin America in the first half of the twentieth century, specifically as it relates to gender, race, and the visual arts. Beginning with a brief overview of the emergence of indigenismo in Mexico and the Andean region, it will move on to offer a comparative reading of the life and works of Mexican painter Frida Kahlo (1907–54) and the lesser-known Bolivian sculptor Marina Núñez del Prado (1910–95). Both women drew heavily from indigenous culture in their works and employed modes of self-fashioning rooted in performed indigeneity. As members of a cosmopolitan elite, Kahlo’s and Núñez del Prado’s engagements with indigenous culture can be framed as appropriative. However, what this article seeks to explore is the extent to which gender and location complicate our interpretation of the racial tensions at the heart of Latin American modernism.","PeriodicalId":45929,"journal":{"name":"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES","volume":"27 1","pages":"75 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INDIGENISMO AND THE LIMITS OF CULTURAL APPROPRIATION\",\"authors\":\"C. Sutherland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0969725X.2022.2093949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article turns a critical eye on the indigenista movement that flourished in Latin America in the first half of the twentieth century, specifically as it relates to gender, race, and the visual arts. Beginning with a brief overview of the emergence of indigenismo in Mexico and the Andean region, it will move on to offer a comparative reading of the life and works of Mexican painter Frida Kahlo (1907–54) and the lesser-known Bolivian sculptor Marina Núñez del Prado (1910–95). Both women drew heavily from indigenous culture in their works and employed modes of self-fashioning rooted in performed indigeneity. As members of a cosmopolitan elite, Kahlo’s and Núñez del Prado’s engagements with indigenous culture can be framed as appropriative. However, what this article seeks to explore is the extent to which gender and location complicate our interpretation of the racial tensions at the heart of Latin American modernism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"75 - 90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2022.2093949\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2022.2093949","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文对20世纪上半叶在拉丁美洲蓬勃发展的土著运动进行了批判,特别是与性别、种族和视觉艺术有关的运动。从墨西哥和安第斯地区土著主义的出现开始,它将对墨西哥画家弗里达·卡罗(1907–54)和鲜为人知的玻利维亚雕塑家玛丽娜·努涅斯·德尔·普拉多(1910–95)的生活和作品进行比较解读。两位女性在作品中都大量借鉴了土著文化,并采用了植根于表演土著的自我塑造模式。作为国际化精英的一员,卡罗和努涅斯·德尔·普拉多与土著文化的接触可以被认为是恰当的。然而,本文试图探讨的是,性别和地点在多大程度上使我们对拉丁美洲现代主义核心种族紧张关系的解释复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INDIGENISMO AND THE LIMITS OF CULTURAL APPROPRIATION
Abstract This article turns a critical eye on the indigenista movement that flourished in Latin America in the first half of the twentieth century, specifically as it relates to gender, race, and the visual arts. Beginning with a brief overview of the emergence of indigenismo in Mexico and the Andean region, it will move on to offer a comparative reading of the life and works of Mexican painter Frida Kahlo (1907–54) and the lesser-known Bolivian sculptor Marina Núñez del Prado (1910–95). Both women drew heavily from indigenous culture in their works and employed modes of self-fashioning rooted in performed indigeneity. As members of a cosmopolitan elite, Kahlo’s and Núñez del Prado’s engagements with indigenous culture can be framed as appropriative. However, what this article seeks to explore is the extent to which gender and location complicate our interpretation of the racial tensions at the heart of Latin American modernism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES
ANGELAKI-JOURNAL OF THE THEORETICAL HUMANITIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Angelaki: journal of the theoretical humanities was established in September 1993 to provide an international forum for vanguard work in the theoretical humanities. In itself a contentious category, "theoretical humanities" represents the productive nexus of work in the disciplinary fields of literary criticism and theory, philosophy, and cultural studies. The journal is dedicated to the refreshing of intellectual coordinates, and to the challenging and vivifying process of re-thinking. Angelaki: journal of the theoretical humanities encourages a critical engagement with theory in terms of disciplinary development and intellectual and political usefulness, the inquiry into and articulation of culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信