散文与阐释艺术：卡吉尔与尼采

IF 0.3 4区哲学 0 LITERATURE

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.5325/philrhet.55.3.0274

S. Howard

{"title":"散文与阐释艺术：卡吉尔与尼采","authors":"S. Howard","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.3.0274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article speculatively reconstructs what I call Howard Caygill's \"unwritten book\" on Nietzsche, based on the collection of Caygill's philosophical essays, Force and Understanding (2021). I propose that an engagement with Nietzsche's thought runs throughout Caygill's work, although it would be a mistake to label Caygill a \"Nietzschean.\" One particularly relevant aspect of Nietzsche's philosophy is his conception of philological reading. After outlining this, I examine the Nietzsche who emerges from Caygill's essays and thus the central themes of the \"unwritten book.\" I close by considering the implications of my account for the distinction between two philosophical forms: the treatise and the essay.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Essay and the Art of Interpretation: Caygill and Nietzsche\",\"authors\":\"S. Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/philrhet.55.3.0274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This article speculatively reconstructs what I call Howard Caygill's \\\"unwritten book\\\" on Nietzsche, based on the collection of Caygill's philosophical essays, Force and Understanding (2021). I propose that an engagement with Nietzsche's thought runs throughout Caygill's work, although it would be a mistake to label Caygill a \\\"Nietzschean.\\\" One particularly relevant aspect of Nietzsche's philosophy is his conception of philological reading. After outlining this, I examine the Nietzsche who emerges from Caygill's essays and thus the central themes of the \\\"unwritten book.\\\" I close by considering the implications of my account for the distinction between two philosophical forms: the treatise and the essay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.55.3.0274\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.55.3.0274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要：本文根据凯吉尔的哲学散文集《力量与理解》（2021），推测性地重构了我所说的霍华德·卡吉尔关于尼采的“不成文的书”。我认为，与尼采思想的接触贯穿于卡吉尔的作品中，尽管将卡吉尔称为“尼采主义者”是错误的。尼采哲学的一个特别相关的方面是他的语文阅读概念。在概述了这一点之后，我审视了凯吉尔散文中的尼采，从而审视了这本“不成文的书”的中心主题。最后，我考虑了我对两种哲学形式之间区别的解释的含义：论文和散文。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Essay and the Art of Interpretation: Caygill and Nietzsche

abstract:This article speculatively reconstructs what I call Howard Caygill's "unwritten book" on Nietzsche, based on the collection of Caygill's philosophical essays, Force and Understanding (2021). I propose that an engagement with Nietzsche's thought runs throughout Caygill's work, although it would be a mistake to label Caygill a "Nietzschean." One particularly relevant aspect of Nietzsche's philosophy is his conception of philological reading. After outlining this, I examine the Nietzsche who emerges from Caygill's essays and thus the central themes of the "unwritten book." I close by considering the implications of my account for the distinction between two philosophical forms: the treatise and the essay.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Multiple-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy and Rhetoric is dedicated to publication of high-quality articles involving the relationship between philosophy and rhetoric. It has a longstanding commitment to interdisciplinary scholarship and welcomes all theoretical and methodological perspectives that advance the journal"s mission. Philosophy and Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation, philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, psychological and sociological studies of rhetoric with a strong philosophical emphasis, and philosophical analyses of the relationship to rhetoric of other areas of human culture and thought, political theory and law.