纳比勒·库卡利博士对一篇题为《

Q2 Social Sciences

World Affairs Pub Date : 2022-10-09 DOI:10.1177/00438200221128267

Nabil Kukali

{"title":"纳比勒·库卡利博士对一篇题为《","authors":"Nabil Kukali","doi":"10.1177/00438200221128267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay offers a discussion and critique of Alon Ben-Meir's (2022) proposal entitled, “The Case for an Israeli-Palestinian-Jordanian Confederation: Why Now and How?” Incorporating elements of other viewpoints and prior proposals to add nuance, I explore Ben-Meir's concerted attempt to think past the exemplary two-state model for settling the Palestine and Israel conflict and to introduce thoughts on how policy makers and common actors can apply a confederal system later on. Given the entrenched one-state reality, I argue that the liberation of Palestinians through emancipation in a solitary popularity-based nation is the most thoughtfully clear option in contrast to many years of failed endeavors.","PeriodicalId":35790,"journal":{"name":"World Affairs","volume":"185 1","pages":"794 - 809"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A CRITIQUE BY DR. NABIL KUKALI ON AN ARTICLE ENTITLED\",\"authors\":\"Nabil Kukali\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00438200221128267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay offers a discussion and critique of Alon Ben-Meir's (2022) proposal entitled, “The Case for an Israeli-Palestinian-Jordanian Confederation: Why Now and How?” Incorporating elements of other viewpoints and prior proposals to add nuance, I explore Ben-Meir's concerted attempt to think past the exemplary two-state model for settling the Palestine and Israel conflict and to introduce thoughts on how policy makers and common actors can apply a confederal system later on. Given the entrenched one-state reality, I argue that the liberation of Palestinians through emancipation in a solitary popularity-based nation is the most thoughtfully clear option in contrast to many years of failed endeavors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Affairs\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"794 - 809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200221128267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200221128267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对阿隆·本·梅尔（Alon Ben Meir）（2022）题为“以色列-巴勒斯坦-约旦联合会的案例：为什么是现在和如何？”的提案进行了讨论和批评，我探讨了本·梅尔（Ben Meir）的共同努力，他试图超越解决巴以冲突的典型两国模式，并介绍政策制定者和共同行为者以后如何应用邦联制度的想法，我认为，与多年失败的努力相比，在一个以民众为基础的孤立国家通过解放巴勒斯坦人是最深思熟虑的明确选择。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A CRITIQUE BY DR. NABIL KUKALI ON AN ARTICLE ENTITLED

This essay offers a discussion and critique of Alon Ben-Meir's (2022) proposal entitled, “The Case for an Israeli-Palestinian-Jordanian Confederation: Why Now and How?” Incorporating elements of other viewpoints and prior proposals to add nuance, I explore Ben-Meir's concerted attempt to think past the exemplary two-state model for settling the Palestine and Israel conflict and to introduce thoughts on how policy makers and common actors can apply a confederal system later on. Given the entrenched one-state reality, I argue that the liberation of Palestinians through emancipation in a solitary popularity-based nation is the most thoughtfully clear option in contrast to many years of failed endeavors.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

World Affairs Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： World Affairs is a quarterly international affairs journal published by Heldref Publications. World Affairs, which, in one form or another, has been published since 1837, was re-launched in January 2008 as an entirely new publication. World Affairs is a small journal that argues the big ideas behind U.S. foreign policy. The journal celebrates and encourages heterodoxy and open debate. Recognizing that miscalculation and hubris are not beyond our capacity, we wish more than anything else to debate and clarify what America faces on the world stage and how it ought to respond. We hope you will join us in an occasionally unruly, seldom dull, and always edifying conversation. If ideas truly do have consequences, readers of World Affairs will be well prepared.