İ. Aral, S. Arslan, A. Yurekli, G. Inan, S. Tekin, H. Bozdemir, S. Sunel, H. Karabuğa, S. Acikgoz
{"title":"癌症肥胖患者乳房内淋巴结放疗的费用是多少?","authors":"İ. Aral, S. Arslan, A. Yurekli, G. Inan, S. Tekin, H. Bozdemir, S. Sunel, H. Karabuğa, S. Acikgoz","doi":"10.18869/ACADPUB.IJRR.18.2.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: The incidence of internal lymph node (IMN) involvement was 465% in breast cancer patients. Despite studies indicating the positive effects of IMNRT on the oncological results, most of the clinicians avoided IMNRT because of the toxicity related to the increased dose of organs at risk (OAR). We aimed to compare the dosimetric results of RT plans with and without IMN containing planning target volumes (PTVs) using helical tomotherapy (HT) in obese patients. Materials and Methods: The PMRT data of 23 obese patients were evaluated retrospectively / dosimetrically. Two PTVs with and without IMN were defined and two separate plans were made with HT. Dose received by IMN and OAR were compared. Results: The untargeted IMN V40 were calculated between 0% to 99%. When the plans are evaluated in terms of critical organs, the inclusion of the IMN into the target volume, the most significant adverse effect was observed in heart doses in the left chest wall (CW) irradiation. The significant increases in cardiac V5 (% 62.6 vs %48.6 p=0.007), V10 (%38.2 vs %23.2 p=0.011), V20 (%14.15 vs %9.06 p=0.045) and maximum heart dose (48.04 vs 43.2 p=0.043) were observed in the left-side CW irradiations that involving the IMN. In CW irradiation on the right side with IMN, only a significant increase in mean heart dose (5.44 vs 4.52 p=0.036) was observed. Lung V5 doses were increased by inclusion with IMN in both sides. There was no difference in the contralateral breast doses in both plans for both sides. Conclusions: If the IMN is not targeted, some of the patients are getting appropriate doses in obese patients.","PeriodicalId":14498,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal mammarial lymph node radiotherapy in obese patients with breast cancer, at what expense?\",\"authors\":\"İ. Aral, S. Arslan, A. Yurekli, G. Inan, S. Tekin, H. Bozdemir, S. Sunel, H. Karabuğa, S. Acikgoz\",\"doi\":\"10.18869/ACADPUB.IJRR.18.2.191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: The incidence of internal lymph node (IMN) involvement was 465% in breast cancer patients. Despite studies indicating the positive effects of IMNRT on the oncological results, most of the clinicians avoided IMNRT because of the toxicity related to the increased dose of organs at risk (OAR). We aimed to compare the dosimetric results of RT plans with and without IMN containing planning target volumes (PTVs) using helical tomotherapy (HT) in obese patients. Materials and Methods: The PMRT data of 23 obese patients were evaluated retrospectively / dosimetrically. Two PTVs with and without IMN were defined and two separate plans were made with HT. Dose received by IMN and OAR were compared. Results: The untargeted IMN V40 were calculated between 0% to 99%. When the plans are evaluated in terms of critical organs, the inclusion of the IMN into the target volume, the most significant adverse effect was observed in heart doses in the left chest wall (CW) irradiation. The significant increases in cardiac V5 (% 62.6 vs %48.6 p=0.007), V10 (%38.2 vs %23.2 p=0.011), V20 (%14.15 vs %9.06 p=0.045) and maximum heart dose (48.04 vs 43.2 p=0.043) were observed in the left-side CW irradiations that involving the IMN. In CW irradiation on the right side with IMN, only a significant increase in mean heart dose (5.44 vs 4.52 p=0.036) was observed. Lung V5 doses were increased by inclusion with IMN in both sides. There was no difference in the contralateral breast doses in both plans for both sides. Conclusions: If the IMN is not targeted, some of the patients are getting appropriate doses in obese patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiation Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Radiation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.IJRR.18.2.191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.IJRR.18.2.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景与目的:癌症患者的内淋巴结(IMN)受累率为465%。尽管研究表明IMNRT对肿瘤学结果有积极影响,但大多数临床医生避免使用IMNRT,因为其毒性与风险器官(OAR)剂量增加有关。我们的目的是比较在肥胖患者中使用螺旋断层治疗(HT)的带有和不带有IMN的计划靶体积(PTV)的RT计划的剂量测定结果。材料与方法:对23例肥胖患者的PMRT数据进行回顾性/剂量评估。定义了两个有IMN和没有IMN的PTV,并制定了两个单独的HT计划。比较了IMN和OAR接受的剂量。结果:非靶向IMN V40的计算结果在0%至99%之间。当根据关键器官对计划进行评估时,将IMN纳入目标体积,在左胸壁(CW)照射的心脏剂量中观察到最显著的不良影响。在涉及IMN的左侧CW照射中,观察到心脏V5(%62.6 vs%48.6 p=0.007)、V10(%38.2 vs%23.2 p=0.011)、V20(%14.15 vs%9.06 p=0.045)和最大心脏剂量(48.04 vs 43.2 p=0.043)的显著增加。在右侧连续波IMN照射中,仅观察到平均心脏剂量显著增加(5.44 vs 4.52 p=0.036)。肺V5剂量通过在两侧加入IMN而增加。在两种方案中,对侧乳腺的剂量对两侧均无差异。结论:如果IMN不是靶向性的,一些肥胖患者会得到适当的剂量。
Internal mammarial lymph node radiotherapy in obese patients with breast cancer, at what expense?
Background and Aim: The incidence of internal lymph node (IMN) involvement was 465% in breast cancer patients. Despite studies indicating the positive effects of IMNRT on the oncological results, most of the clinicians avoided IMNRT because of the toxicity related to the increased dose of organs at risk (OAR). We aimed to compare the dosimetric results of RT plans with and without IMN containing planning target volumes (PTVs) using helical tomotherapy (HT) in obese patients. Materials and Methods: The PMRT data of 23 obese patients were evaluated retrospectively / dosimetrically. Two PTVs with and without IMN were defined and two separate plans were made with HT. Dose received by IMN and OAR were compared. Results: The untargeted IMN V40 were calculated between 0% to 99%. When the plans are evaluated in terms of critical organs, the inclusion of the IMN into the target volume, the most significant adverse effect was observed in heart doses in the left chest wall (CW) irradiation. The significant increases in cardiac V5 (% 62.6 vs %48.6 p=0.007), V10 (%38.2 vs %23.2 p=0.011), V20 (%14.15 vs %9.06 p=0.045) and maximum heart dose (48.04 vs 43.2 p=0.043) were observed in the left-side CW irradiations that involving the IMN. In CW irradiation on the right side with IMN, only a significant increase in mean heart dose (5.44 vs 4.52 p=0.036) was observed. Lung V5 doses were increased by inclusion with IMN in both sides. There was no difference in the contralateral breast doses in both plans for both sides. Conclusions: If the IMN is not targeted, some of the patients are getting appropriate doses in obese patients.
期刊介绍:
Iranian Journal of Radiation Research (IJRR) publishes original scientific research and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, and Medical and health physics. The clinical studies submitted for publication include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, especially chemoradiotherapy approaches, and relevant innovations in hyperthermia, brachytherapy, high LET irradiation, nuclear medicine, dosimetry, tumor imaging, radiation treatment planning, radiosensitizers, and radioprotectors. All manuscripts must pass stringent peer-review and only papers that are rated of high scientific quality are accepted.